Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NTSB: Co-Pilot Caused 2001 Crash..(put on your B.S. detectors)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:00 PM
Original message
NTSB: Co-Pilot Caused 2001 Crash..(put on your B.S. detectors)
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 01:01 PM by SoCalDem
NTSB: Co-Pilot Caused 2001 Crash
ktla 5 - 28 minutes ago
Investigators say overreaction led to crash of American 587 at New York's JFK, killing 265.

By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar and Michael Muskal
Times Staff Writers

October 26, 2004, 9:58 AM PDT

WASHINGTON -- The staff of the National Transportation Safety Board today blamed the co-pilot for the U.S.' second-deadliest crash, the 2001 destruction of an American Airlines flight taking off from John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York.

Meeting in Washington, the agency's board heard how the plane's copilot overreacted and caused Flight 587 to crash, killing all 260 people on board and five on the ground in Belle Harbor, N.Y.

The 150-ton Airbus A300 took off on Nov. 12, 2001 bound for the Dominican Republic — just two months after terrorists knocked down the World Trade Center in Manhattan, killing about 3,000 people and sending New York into shock.

The crash into a quiet residential neighborhood further strained nerves stretched thin by Sept. 11 and ignited fears that terrorists had struck again.

"Several human performance and airplane characteristics combined in a most unfortunate way," said Robert Benzon, the lead investigator on the safety board's staff.

more @
http://ktla.trb.com/news/nationworld/nation/ktla-102604ntsb_lat,0,2123908.story?coll=ktla-news-1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Right; and a frayed wire brought down Flight 800.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. read this thread
Father of Flight 587 Co-Pilot Speaks Out

it includes a post from a DUer whose husband knew the co-pilot and flew THAT JET shortly before the day of the crash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I did read it.. I think blaming the pilots is a cop-out
but I did not see the newspaper article posted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. well, that was my point.
the wife (the DUer) also discounted blaming the pilots...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OutsourceBush Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. US gov desn't want the public to know that 587 and 800 were taken down
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 01:18 PM by OutsourceBush
by terrorists. They must be afraid it would ruin the airline industry, what is left of it, if Americans knew that terrorists have had successes inside the US.

There was another plane that went down before 911, and I don't have the flight number handy, but I remember that the co-pilot took control of the jet and plunged it into the sea killing all aboard, shouting 'God is Great!" That seemed to be the set-up for 911, but you don't hear much about it do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That was an Egyptian airliner
and you are right..I think that was related too..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. i still think that 800 was an accidental navy shoot down..
do you have any links to substantiate a possible act of terrorism? I'd like to research them. TIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OutsourceBush Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No links, just looking at it in the big picture after 911
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 03:24 PM by OutsourceBush
at the times people said they saw a rocket lauched and heading up toward the aircraft. Shoulder launch missle attack?

I don't believe the US gov wants people to know how unsafe they are, so they cover these things up. That's just my opinion. Only people that will ever know are the ones in charge of the investigations and the people they report to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. author peter lance thinks the same thing..
he wrote about it in his new book. I've read quite a bit about 800, and Lance's theory was the first I had ever heard anyone speculate about an act of terrorism. Thanks for the response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. there is no evidence that this is tue
Planes crash for a lot of reasons, not all of which are terror. The NTSB does a good job, given what they have to work with (just pieces mainly). The EgyptAir crash was one lone nutcase, probably not related to 9/11 or anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. Hell, if only one plane had hit the WTC on 9/11, they'd still be...

calling it a 'tragic mishap'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Aside: Stolen explosives in Iraq weighed over twice as much as this plane!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Successful terrorist attack
Since nearly everyone was still focused on Sept. 11, when AA 587 went down on Sept. 12, it didn't receive the sort of attention that it deserved.

Eyewitnesses were ignored or told to shut-up.

Surveillance cameras that had captured the aircraft in distress had their videos taken and never returned. The videos were never shown.

An expert told how easy it would be to disable an aircraft as it sat on the tarmac.

As a pilot, I've have never before heard that it is possible to "tear off the tail" of an aircraft by "aggressive use of the rudder." It's like saying that you can tear off the wings by aggressively using the ailerons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OutsourceBush Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. It stinks of cover-up for sure
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 04:17 PM by OutsourceBush
Your second links tells the tell...

"With flight 587, more than a dozen eyewitnesses, including a police lieutenant and a firefighter, said they saw an explosion before the vertical stabilizer and both engines separated from the plane"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. You're a pilot?
I don't know if I read your post correctly.

Of course you can cause structural failure of aircraft parts by movements over the design limits. Its simple physics.

Flight school refresher course maybe?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Transcript of Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR)
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 04:22 PM by gulfcoastliberal
CVR:

# 9:11:35: TOWER: American five eighty-seven heavy Kennedy tower, caution wake turbulence runway three one left, taxi into position and hold.

# 9:14: (Flight 587 begins its takeoff, getting off the ground by 9:15.)

# 9:15:28: STATES: Clean machine.

# 9:15:28: MOLIN: (sound similar to yawn) Thank you.

# 9:15:44: STATES: Little wake turbulence, huh?

# 9:15:44: MOLIN: Yeah.

# 9:15:47: (sound similar to five sets of stabilizer trim switch clicks)

# 9:15:48: MOLIN: Two fifty thank you.

# 9:15:51: (sound of a thump)

# 9:15:52: (sound of click)

# 9:15:52: (sound of two thumps)

# 9:15:54: MOLIN: Max power (spoken in strained voice)

# 9:15:55: STATES: You all right?

# 9:15:55: MOLIN: Yeah, I’m fine.

# 9:15:56: STATES: Hang onto it. Hang onto it.

# 9:15:56: (sound of snap)

# 9:15:57: MOLIN: Let’s go for power, please.

# 9:15:57: (sound of loud thump)

# 9:15:58: (sound of loud bang)

# 9:16:00: MOLIN: (sound similar to grunt)

# 9:16:00: (roaring noise starts and increases in amplitude)

# 9:16:01: Holy (expletive)

# 9:16:01: (sound similar to single chime)

# 9:16:02: (sound similar to single chime)

# 9:16:04: (sound similar to stall warning repetitive chime for 1.9 seconds)

# 9:16:06: (roaring noise decreases and ends)

# 9:16:07: What the hell are we into (unintelligible). We’re stuck in it.

# 9:16:07: (sound similar to continuous repetitive chimes for one second)

# 9:16:09: (sound similar to continuous repetitive chimes for three seconds)

# 9:16:12: STATES: Get out of it, get out of it.

END OF RECORDING

"Get out of it! Get out of it!" Capt. Edward States hollered as the cockpit recorder went silent.

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/31405p-29761c.html

The captain has dual rudder controls and could have stopped Molin if he was doing anyhting wrong. Also, anyone who knows anything about flying understands when something goes wrng with the plane (obviously unless it's an engine problem) you increase power. Molin did that and more, using emergency power to try to keep the plane in the air. Captain States must have agreed with the course of action or he would've suggested something else. His "clean machine" comment seems to me like a compliment on the takeoff. They waited over 2 minutes on the tarmac for the wake to clear.

Remember the NYT hit piece on him? Classic Agency public disinformation. This was no pilot error and they heap insult upon injury for this poor family who suffer due to *'s incompetence. The gov't had warnings this would happen that day.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thank you all for the posts
My husband and I have been watching and listening to reports on this all day. it is really hard to listen to the media flat out saying it was Sten's fault. It wasn't, it just wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. You're welcome! I'm really pissed they are covering this up by blaming him
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OutsourceBush Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. even if one would chose to believe the gov cover story, it still would
not be pilot error, it would be a training error according to the gov. I believe it was a terrorist explosion myself. Surely any thinking individual would agree. Any pilot that went up shortly after 911 was a brave individual and deserves all of our respect. The gov had to know that every jet was still at risk for some time after 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. "clean machine:"
probably a slang reference to slats being retracted.

At higher speeds, there are 'stops' on the rudder to prevent over steer and too much stress on the rudder. At lower speeds, the 'stops' are automatically adjusted to allow for greater movement of the rudder.

What do you think happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. in a related story
the * administration announced that the copilot of the doomed aircraft was actually Bill Clinton's penis and raised the terror alert another level to brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
22. This is just plain mean
this must fall under the compassionate conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC