Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media Matters sends letter to NBC requesting Limbaugh be dropped

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 05:48 PM
Original message
Media Matters sends letter to NBC requesting Limbaugh be dropped
from 2004 election central reporting..

MMFA asks NBC not to feature Limbaugh on election night
Mr. Neal Shapiro
NBC News
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112

Dear Mr. Shapiro:

I am writing to you today to ask that NBC not feature conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh as a political commentator during election night coverage, as your network did in 2002.

As you should know, Limbaugh has a track record of using extreme, hateful speech that has no place in civil discourse. To pick just a few examples from this year, as documented by Media Matters for America: Limbaugh compared the abuse of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib to a fraternity prank, telling America and an international audience on the taxpayer-funded American Forces Radio and Television Service that the torture was a "brilliant maneuver" and that the photos were "good old American pornography." Limbaugh further claimed that "the reaction to the stupid torture is an example of the feminization of this country." He has also labeled Senator John Kerry a "stupid S.O.B." and a "gigolo."

Limbaugh's racist commentary also makes him unsuitable for an appearance on your network. Just last month, Limbaugh, commenting on Reverend Jesse Jackson joining the Kerry campaign, stated: "The Kerry campaign has finally gotten a chocolate chip," sparking outrage in the African American community. On March 26, Limbaugh said: "Hugo, Cesar -- whatever. A Chavez is a Chavez. We've always had problems with them." The talk show host also claimed: "ruce is an old Arabic word. Goes way, way back in Islamic-Arabic culture, and it means, 'We will get you later.'"

Limbaugh's sexist commentary is beyond the pale as well. Last spring, Limbaugh said that women "actually wish" for sexual harassment. Limbaugh shared with listeners his "pet name" for the National Organization for Women (NOW): "National Association of Gals" (his acronym: "NAG"), claiming that the "militant feminists" who make up the "NAGs" "aren't determining who wins elections. White men are." Limbaugh also warned that with "new female police chiefs ... we can watch out for some naked pyramids," a crude reference to Abu Ghraib following the appointment of four women as chiefs of police in four major U.S. cities.

Limbaugh has a reckless disregard for facts and the truth. For example, Limbaugh falsely stated that the 9-11 Commission report confirmed Vice President Dick Cheney's claim that September 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta may have met with an Iraqi intelligence officer in April 2001. As you know, the report said this meeting did not occur. Limbaugh was wrong about the minimum wage on his April 29 and August 12 shows, and he mischaracterized the U.S. fiscal shortfall on July 8.

Limbaugh has also claimed that in reference to Iraq, " Bush never said the words 'imminent threat.' That's another myth that gets perpetuated by Kerry and picked up by the mainstream press. Bush never said there was an imminent threat. He wanted to go. It was a mounting threat. He wanted to get in there before it became an imminent threat. ... Now, Bush has never -- Bush hasn't used the word 'imminent' ever, and neither has Cheney." But Bush did call Iraq an "urgent threat"; Cheney called Iraq a "mortal threat"; and other senior White House officials assented (on October 16, 2002 and January 26, 2003) when reporters applied the "imminent threat" characterization. And Limbaugh's claim that AIDS "hasn't made that jump to the heterosexual community ... other than in Africa ... it's promiscuity that ... spreads this," is clearly false -- and jaw-dropping.

Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion, and the conservative point of view should be represented in the media. There are plenty of conservative pundits who make tempered, intellectually honest arguments. I take issue, however, with Limbaugh's dishonesty and vitriol. His lies and hate speech have no place on your network and our public airwaves.

I look forward to hearing back from you on this matter before Election Day.

Sincerely,

David Brock
President and CEO
Media Matters for America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. excellent! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey, Brock - them's the very reasons they picked him!
Is GE supposed to feel shame or sumpthin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Beautiful!!!!!
This should be sent to all media outlets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is David Brock the reporter who appeared on PBS during the debates
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 06:06 PM by clydefrand
On edit: I know that he isn't now. I was thinking of David Brooks.

But who is David Brock?

Second edit: I know who he is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueblitzkrieg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Author of Blinded by the Right and The Republican Noise Machine
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 06:06 PM by blueblitzkrieg
Used to be a Repug but made the switch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gavodotcom Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good letter.
I think what we've had here is a little social concern in NBC. The media has been very desirous that a republican NAZI radio personality do well. There is a little hope invested in Limbaugh, and he got a lot of credit for the performance of Republicans that he didn't deserve. The homophobia and xenophobia carried this party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpakman91 Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. let's not hold out breath
unlikely anything good could come of this IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What is that supposed to mean?
You are very mistaken if you think David or anyone here thinks this letter is going to keep Limbaugh out of the Media. That isnt the point of this letter, the point of this letter is to continue pushing and fighting back. There was a time when people of Limbaugh's ilk were just outsiders who wrote letters to NBC complaining about thier content and guests.

Nobody is holding thier breath, and good has already come of this. It is doing exactly what it was designed to do, it was not designed to be some magic force for change, it was designed for people to read on his website and websites like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Let's not forget his racist ESPN commentary.
That got him canned. Also, he's going to be indicted for felonies any day now. Based on some of his bizarre comments of late I might suspect he's relapsing as well. In short, why would any network want to risk putting him on live tv?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC