|
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 03:55 AM by Selatius
It's because the Republican Party has successfully utilized wedge issues such as abortion, gay marriage, etc. Health care, public education, labor standards, the environment, civil liberties--these are the things that progressives have dominated in the past. This is why the 20th century saw major changes brought about under progressive governments, courts, as well as people's movements.
The wedge issue attempts to divide the populace by showing that "they" are not of "us." It becomes an us vs. them mentality. Abortion is probably the greatest wedge issue ever utilized by the Republican leadership to make many people abandon the Democratic Party. Where did the Christian left go? They are still there. It's just that even though the Democratic Party may address things such as health care and education, many do have issues with voting for a candidate that sanctions "the murder of the unborn."
Decades ago, the divisive issue of abortion and gay rights and such were not the major issues of the day. Back then, poverty, war, and civil rights dominated the political discourse, and that's where the liberals dominated. This is where we had widespread support even among Christians because it was consistent with Jesus' message of compassion for others. Abortion and gay rights were small potatoes compared to the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights Movement. The Republicans after the Vietnam era then decided to play on those issues heavily in an attempt to show itself as the party of family values and of morality and decency. The role of corporate media also played a part. It functioned as a megaphone for them. It made sense, since their views on the environment, public education, health care, and some other issues were not as appealing as what the liberals were fighting for.
I'm not going to say that it's the magic bullet answer you're looking for, but I'll tell you that it is my opinion on why so many identify with the Republicans even though their long-term goal is to dismantle social programs and cripple the government's ability to enforce regulatory law meant to protect people. It's also in line with the corporatists' dream of a small, weak government that is unable to check their power.
|