JSJ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 03:33 AM
Original message |
Did Agents of the Administration Steal the 380 Tons of Explosives? |
|
There's no doubt in my mind that is what happened. Which doesn't mean they're not already in the hands of Bush-'friendly' terrorists around the world. And my gut agrees with my mind on this one. What does your mind/gut tell you?
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 03:35 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Or they could modify the explosives to "WMD" them |
|
Put chemical or biological agents into them and violla! You have your weapons of mass destruction.
|
JSJ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. that's very plausible, bluestateguy |
|
To add to your scenario: If the plot is to find them in the hands of the people most interested in keeping Iraq in a state of chaos, that would be any one of the US terrorist fronts operating in-country, then the Administration would profit in two ways; "discovering" them would be one, and, two would be pinning the blame on the all-encompassing freedom-hating terrorists who are in most cases played by US contractors and former and active-duty spec ops.
|
w4rma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 03:51 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Look at all the bombings in Iraq. That's where the explosives have ended |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 03:54 AM by w4rma
up. In secret caches held by the insurgents until a little bit is used to blow up some U.S. soldiers or some Iraqis who are trying to work with Bush. Not in the pockets of Oliver North or whatever.
Occam's Razor: One should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything.
|
0rganism
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:43 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Isn't it enough that the DoD didn't prioritize guarding the explosives? |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 04:44 AM by 0rganism
Why do we have to make this into an extra conspiracy for which there is zero evidence (that I know of, anyway) when the "conventional" story (and the varying lies, excuses, and whininess offered by way of explanation) is enough, by itself, to make the bush administration look like clueless imbeciles?
|
JSJ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. fair enough- but i do think my explanation works until otherwise d-bunked |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:50 AM
Response to Original message |