Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So let me get this right about Al Qaqaa and the explosives.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:45 AM
Original message
So let me get this right about Al Qaqaa and the explosives.
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 10:38 AM by Wat_Tyler
US Satellites can see WMD installations that aren't there and it's considered good enough reason to go to war, but the same satellites cannot confirm that 380 tons of high explosives were removed from a site? These are very selective satellites, aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shaolinmonkey Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've been wondering the same thing.
Just what the hell are we paying all this money to the Pentagon for? Where is this money going? None of this shit works and it's never anyone's fault.

This is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. "We know where the weapons are" (pre-invasion statement) go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Remember Powell's UN presentation? Here's a reprise...
Powell also showed a satellite image of a new missile test stand, ''larger than anything it has ever had.'' He said the exhaust vent on the large stand was five times larger than one nearby used in the launching of short-range missiles. Iraq is allowed to produce missiles that fly only 150 kilometers; the new test stand, he said, was intended for missiles that have a range of 1,200 kilometers.

Analysts said the secretary of state also made the first reference to Iraq possessing dry, storable biological weapons, which can be 100 times more lethal than Iraq's previously known wet agents. Powell also discussed for the first time live human experiments of deadly chemical agents on 1,600 Iraqi death-row prisoners.

Observers, though, said Powell's strongest pieces of information were two satellite images of decontamination trucks outside what were believed to be chemical munition plants. One was next to the al-Mussayyib facility in May 2002. A followup image of the site in July 2002 shows all the topsoil removed. ''The Iraqis literally removed the crust of the earth from large portions of this site in order to conceal chemical weapons evidence,'' Powell said.

Patrick Garrett, a defense analyst at globalsecurity.org, a Washington-based firm that specializes in satellite imagery, said Powell ''hit a home run'' with the photos.

''You don't have a chemical decontamination truck present at a location unless there are chemical weapons there,'' Garrett said. ''That is as much of a smoking gun as you can get.''


Other analysts noted that the image of the decontamination truck appeared to have been made fuzzy deliberately. ''They have better imagery, but you can't give the best methods away,'' said Jay C. Farrar, a former senior Defense Department official. ''Their imagery allows them to read the license plates on the trucks.''

http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2003/030206-unpowell06.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. So, if they can indentify the roles of individual trucks
surely they can identify the forty or so trucks needed to remove the explosives, regardless of the time period. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandaod Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well said.
They're lying, of course. They just walked away from the site in April of 2003, with all the explosives still there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. And the weapons inspecters TOLD US THEY WERE THERE!
"Make sure you put some guards on al Qaqaa, there's a shitload of high explosives there!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. This story has legs. How could they not know where the explosives are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MacDo Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. This story
....just like Memogate is going to cost us votes. When will learn not to jump on the right wing media bandwagon every time a story breaks?
Ever consider this was Repuke Fishing to see if we'd bite, hook, line and sinker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Why will it cost us votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MacDo Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The debunking
has already started by the media. It's too late to start putting any doubt in the swing voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Only if that becomes the dominant meme. I'm not convinced it will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MacDo Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I hope you're right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. And they can't say they didn't know it was so important. See this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
15. Those stubborn satellite photos...
you can't tell me that while Colin was waving
around the photo of the two water distilling trucks, the
gov. didn't have a satellite photo of this weapon
cache? It's not like this is country is a jungle, jane.

Lies upon lies leads to one big yucca mountain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC