liberalpragmatist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 05:57 PM
Original message |
Lincoln would've been called a "FLIP-FLOPPER" |
|
Can you imagine George W. Bush running against Abe Lincoln? Now, I'm not comparing John Kerry to Abe Lincoln (although there is some physical resemblance) - my point is that Lincoln straddled the slavery issue. He was genuinely torn about it, holding nuanced beliefs (like most NORMAL people). He disliked the institution, but wasn't an all-out abolitionist because he didn't view it as politically possible or economically sustainable. Nor did he approve of extreme abolitionist activists. More typical of a politician, he would emphasize his antislavery personal beliefs before antislavery audiences and play them down and play up his willingness to retain slavery when before pro-slavery audiences.
What this shows are two things. Number 1, politicians, like most reasonable people, often have views that aren't taken to the logical extremes, but are "nuanced" and somewhat complex - like normal people. Number 2, it's simply a fact of politics that politicians have to pander or straddle truly controversial issues if it's going to cause them a lot of harm. It's somewhat upsetting, but frankly, it doesn't really bother me so long as it doesn't become chronic and paralyzes a politician from ever doing anything - if in the context of a campaign, they have to straddle somewhat or play down certain views, that's fine with me, so long as it's not chronic and so long as they get elected and are effective.
Just putting some things in context.
|
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Shame on those Bush* Bastards!
|
VOX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 06:24 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Lincoln killed his own people! Hundreds of thousands of Americans... |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-28-04 06:25 PM by rezmutt
The fact that those killed were toting weapons and had formed large armies in open rebellion against the federal government is, well, beside the point.
Also, Lincoln only freed the slaves in the states that were in revolt. He did nothing for the slaves in Kentucky, Delaware, Maryland, or Missouri, as he did not want those border states going over to the Confederacy.
- - - - Don't get me wrong, I think Abe was great and actually a political genius. As author Shelby Foote says, "Everything {Lincoln} did was calculated for effect."
I think very highly of Abe -- that was back when the Republican Party was liberal!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message |