Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

why was the O'Reilly Harassment Case Settled out of court??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:19 PM
Original message
why was the O'Reilly Harassment Case Settled out of court??
and why were the terms undisclosed??? this could have been the one chance to have him resign in disgrace!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because:
The tapes were damning. They were probably also a HOOT!

He paid through the nose (all of the money she would have gotten from a court case, plus the book and movie rights, the TV special airing the tapes, the National Enquirer exclusive)

They would have RUINED him had he not paid.

He needed to save his career.

The price he finally offered was right.

Good for her--nothing better in the world than separating a self-righteous prick from his money. The only really sad bit about all this is that I did want to HEAR THEM, in all their salacious perversity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samwisefoxburr Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't get it...
...he paid this woman millions of dollars to destroy the tapes, right? So, that proves that they exist and proves that what is said to be on them is true. He loses either way, and I bet even if they were released nothing would have heppened to him, just would've been something fun to listen to. And the tapes probably would have been forgotten by the mainstream media within a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree with you, but he'll think of another way to spin it..........
and his moronic viewers will believe what he tells them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. He was on TV tonight describing the whole thing as a "brutal ordeal"...
and essentially ordering his supporters to never bring it up again.

Geezus!! It made me want to keep the story alive as a long as it takes
to make him endure a truely brutal ordeal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. He Talked about It TONIGHT (Friday)? He Said He Would NEVER
talk about it AGAIN-----that was YESTERDAY/tHURSDAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. It was likely a repeat of what he said on Thurs.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Another RW Pervert gets off and his audience just slavers over him. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. $$$$$$$$$$$$$....the trump card.
She got rich, O'Reilly got shown for what he is. Yawn.

I wish Rush Lugnut would try to buy off the D.A. or a witness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. i just don't like that "admits no wrongdoing" part
which will absolve him completely (at least in the eyes of the law, if not public opinion)

and i wanted those tapes released!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I didn't really pay much attention to this story...
Edited on Fri Oct-29-04 02:42 PM by Heyo
.. dont pay much attention to O'Reilly...

But weren't he and his lawyer TRYING to get the tapes released, and she didn't want that?

Or was it the other way around?

:shrug:

Heyo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrRock Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. ^
He settled because he was guilty. This guy is so obstinate and self-righteous, there is no way that he would have settled unless he had something to hide. If he truly was innocent, he would have fought this thing forever. If he claims to have settled to avoid a lengthy and costly court case, he's full of shit. It is the luxury of the wealthy to waste the time of the poor. That's why corporations will spend millions of dollars to prove that they don't owe someone thousands; because they can! If O'Reilly was truly innocent, he would have let the courts do their jobs, and prove his innocence.

As for the tapes, in this age of information, they will surface somewhere eventually. Someone probably already has a copy, and will release them at some point. Man, I hope that's the case and we get to see his smug ass squirm while the tapes are played everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. All of what you said may be true...
... but I still don't know the answer to my question. I had heard mumblings about the tapes recently. Which side was arguing to release the tapes, and which side was arguing not to? Was Ron Green trying to get the tapes relased? Are there even any tapes?

Heyo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. Right. Also, I think chances are excellent this will happen again.
As the Michael Jackson case shows, if someone is guilty as hell of perverse and abusive behavior, it is an ongoing theme throughout one's life. and, buying someone off this time will probably only give the little twerp confidence that he can continue to get away with said behavior. I give him about two years before the next complaint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. That sentence ALONE probably cost him a million
...so I am glad he is poorer for being allowed to say it. It probably would have cost him twice that had he not added that he would NEVER SPEAK OF the incident again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbie67 Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. so the tapes wouldn't be released n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. He Settled Because HE DID IT, & THEY HAVE TAPES!
It's obvious. Then, by sealing the record, he never actually has to admit he did it, and he'll wait until the sheep forget about it.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NervousRex Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dil-Doh'Really won this one.
He's out a few million..and he remains to pollute the airwaves and the human race. She got rich, but we lost not being able to tear this piece of toe-jam down, permanently....I have no respect for her..she's a greedy slimeball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I'm guessing it was less than sixty, but at LEAST
TEN, plus attorney's fees. And I'll bet the lawyer keeps the tapes in a safe forever and a day. If he ever gets caught doing this shit again, it will be Michael Jackson time, where the chickens come home to roost!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
24. Well, be fair; it's more than money. The pressure on her would have been
terrible and relentless. I don't blame her for wanting to take the money and let it die, although i am also sorry this one didn't go all the way. Still, I feel fairly confident that O'Reilly will be finding himself in another jam sooner or later, and eventually it'll be one he can't wiggle out of. He is: a big ol' mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. The tapes would have probably ended his career!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. And besides, once a misogynist sex fiend and pervert, always a
...misogynist sex fiend and pervert. If he's done it once, he'll do it again. Just watch. This ain't over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I can't believe she settled
Now he's going to spin it around to where he was the victim, she was just after his money and now noone has any proof. Stupid, Stupid, Stupid, now he's out there waiting for the next woman so he can do it again. I hope at least his wife has the guts to leave him and take him for all he's worth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. Why wouldn't she settle?
They almost settled (according to her lawyer) before O'Reilly filed a counter-suit alleging extortion. I have no clue as to why O'Reilly did that, only to settle in the end anyway. Maybe she had tapes even more damaging than they thought originally?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. Because
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BensMom Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
22. Not nice
This is not very nice of me....but where is Larry Flynt when you need him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vinnievin777 Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
25. What happened was
Edited on Sat Oct-30-04 01:28 AM by vinnievin777
Bill O'Rightwing was taped but the accuser had sent emails during the alleged time that she loved her job and was having a great time. So he settled by paying her off. She was told that it was an uphill battle because of the emails and the fact that the defense would say "why didn't you just hang up the phone?" also O'Reilly has a lot of money and power and Fox was counter-suing in a fashion that would never have been allowed by you or me (suing a party after you talked about settling for extortion) --She said she felt intimidated but it is very hard to prove in court so they reached a settlement. O'Rightupyourskirt went back to attacking the NAACP tonight on his show so he obviously is never going to stop being a slime.

Vinnie Vin
http://www.vinnievin.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikedemocrat Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
26. Because he was probably guilty
Hypocrit too seeing how he rants about people like Michael Jackson settling out of court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
27. Actually, I am surprised he didn't pay her right away.
They were discussing payments with her lawyer, but then stopped and went with a counter-suit. Which obviously was stupid, since now everybody knows what pervert O'Reilly really is and they still had to pay her off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncle ray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
29. might not be done yet
who's to say that her friend, who he wanted to have a threesome with, didn't take it upon herself to make her own tapes...or some other woman, there might be a dozen women waiting in line to string him up, and he just, ahem, blew his wad. let's hope her lawyers say some loophole in the settlement that will allow the tapes to get out somehow, without affecting the settlement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC