Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why shouldn't ex-felons be allowed to vote?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:08 PM
Original message
Why shouldn't ex-felons be allowed to vote?
Edited on Fri Oct-29-04 03:08 PM by bleedingheart
I just don't get it. The christian right likes to blather on about values but why can't a person who has paid their debt to society vote?

Let's think about this, when a felon is released from prison the greatest hope we can have is that they get a job, pay their taxes and make a better life for themselves. Why not allow them to vote?

It is just an outrage and the stupidest part is that republicans are arguing about keeping felons from voting but where is the outrage and marches to put an end to this stupid practice??????

I read somewhere that Coretta King spoke about this issue but to be honest I think that back in 2000 when this issue came out we should have worked to have eliminated the idea of purging anyone from the voter rolls unless they moved or died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. BEcause a large number of them aren't white silly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I realize that may be the case but all the more reason to get rid of
this "Jim Crow" like practice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. they certainly would be if they hammered on Ken Lays
the way they hammer on other crimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. You snatched the words right off my fingers. You must have DSL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uhhhh..... do they tend to vote the Dem candidate??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specter Donating Member (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Does
it matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. It shouldn't but it might..... but this article explains that they
might tend to be democrats... and how convenient is it that they are targeted by the voting system??? Whom is it convenient for??

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9785-2004Aug17.html
>>On Election Day it will not matter to some 4.7 million Americans whether they are Republicans, Democrats, independents or whether they have an opinion on anything at all. Under various state laws, they are barred from voting because they have felony records. This includes not just prison inmates (48 states), parolees (33 states) and probationers (29 states) but also a large number of people -- one third of the disenfranchised in all -- who are off parole and "free." Minorities are hit particularly hard by these state laws: They deny 13 percent of African American men the vote.<<



http://slate.msn.com/id/2105524/
>>Gov. Bush's own task force on the 2000 election recommended that the Legislature change county election supervisors from elected to nonpartisan positions. But the Legislature did not act on this recommendation, nor on the suggestion of election reform groups that the secretary of state also be selected by a nonpartisan commission, to ensure the necessary firewall between election officials and politicians.<<
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I really don't see why convicted felons serving their time
should be denied their right to vote. Losing your liberty is sufficient, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. that is also a very good point!
and they are often affected by who is elected to office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yep, And it eliminates the entire felon rolls thingie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. technically it would be a cost savings as well because any of these
stupid systems costs more to maintain than just letting everyone vote.
Florida paid a lot of money to "scrub" their voter rolls...eliminating that "scrubbing" would save money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoffnung Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Just seems like an open door for coercion and corruption
Whats stopping a warden from threatening prisoners into voting for a particular candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Like fundie ministers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoffnung Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Not really
Because people who go to those churches do it by free will oppose to someone locked up in prison they don't have any freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. they still have free will and to be honest there are a lot of church goers
that lack free will...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoffnung Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. "a lot of church goers that lack free will"
Comparing prisoner to some mindless church goer who chooses to believe the crap that is being feed to him/her is an insult to... well prisoners and again church goers are not held behind steel bars with limited and closely filtered contact with the outside world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. *ex*-felons
not those currently serving time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specter Donating Member (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well
Edited on Fri Oct-29-04 03:18 PM by specter
let me tell you im a felon and its bullshit that Ive done my time and cant do the things that my taxes pay for, like vote, get subsidized housing. Yeah I made a mistake and I payed for it dearly, no one is perfect look at the 5 million disenfranchised voters in this country and growing. Soon as they say in prison, there will only be prisoners and guards in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihaveaquestion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. It started in the South as part of the Jim Crow laws
More blacks were felons, due to the inequities of the justice system (what an understatement, sheesh!) and keeping felons from voting kept blacks from voting.

In Florida, felons can regain their voting rights via a petition process. I don't know how hard/easy this is to actually do and given the felon-voter-purge craze started in FL, felons who regain their voting rights might still be turned away.

The situation may still boil down to - the state gets to make a mistake, turn a voter away and then say later "Opps, my bad, you were really supposed to be able to vote a week/month/whatever ago."

I think this is just one of the ways repukes are counting on to reduce democratic voters little by little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think people should be allowed to vote IN JAIL
With the lockup rate in America one of the highest in the world, I think people in jail also have a right to participate in their government.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. dogtag mentioned that as well and I think it is a great point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zing Zing Zingbah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. They are allowed to vote in jail.
I think only the people in jail on felony charges are denied the right to vote. I remember some group went to the Orange County (FL) jail to register new voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. They are counted in the census
Edited on Fri Oct-29-04 04:38 PM by George_S
And the counties make big bucks off of that. So maybe they shouldn't count unless able to vote.

edit: fixed typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's not the same in all states
Here in misery, if you've completed your sentence then your voting rights are restored.
There are however, other serious impediments to having a felony conviction on ones record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinnerman Donating Member (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. I think everyone should be able to vote
1 man 1 vote,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. They're persona non grata politically
because they've seriously broken society's rules; for that reason it makes sense to me. Once they're off parole they can vote again. What's the problem? Consequences? They've earned them.

Flame on!:)

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Problem: Some states don't EVER allow them to vote again
Even after they've served all their time/parole is over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one_true_leroy Donating Member (807 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
24. think about it...
make a law to marginalize certain populations, then don't let them vote after they serve time. marijuana entrepreneurs (mostly lower class, non-repubs) are a good example. tend to be liberal, so it's easy to want them disenfranchised (assuming you're a 'law 'n order, boots 'n spurs' politico). no-one who goes to prison is going to vote for the people who put them in jail, so you don't want them voting for the other guy when they get out. you get them outta the way for 5-15 years (what's it, something like 1.8million non-violent offenders in prison now... 1/3 black males ages 18-40 incarcerated, or on parole/probation?) then they are no longer any threat politically. it's an easily digested form of poll tax/ loyalty oath/ voter qualification, and the zinger is that if you argue against it, you're labeled soft on crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
28. Because Tom Delay will one day
be an ex-felon. Why would you ever want someone like that to have access to the ballot box? ;-)



All kidding aside, this is just one of many means used to disenfranchise the poor and minorities in our country- who are disproportionally represented in that particular population. The poor and minorites are more likely to be charged with these types of crimes and more likely to plea bargain for reduced sentences (whether they have a good lawyer or not, they are still likely to be forced to do so).

Remember, possession of powder cocaine (the drug of choice of rich white yuppies) carries a lesser *mandatory* sentence than that imposed on crack cocaine offenders (who are of course most likely poor and/or minority).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anakie Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. as the Bush twins have police records are they eligible to vote??
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
30. Part of the eugenics program n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
32. Because they might actually know how bad Republican policy is
for people who are born on the wrong side of the tracks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC