Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WooHoo!! FAIRNESS DOCTRINE DOT COM -- Check this out

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 05:44 PM
Original message
WooHoo!! FAIRNESS DOCTRINE DOT COM -- Check this out
Actually, I haven't even checked it out yet. This just in (mymailbox) from Media Matters:

Fairnessdoctrine.com launches petition calling for return of the Fairness Doctrine

Tired of imbalanced political discourse on our airwaves? Media Matters for America has joined with Democracy Radio and the Media Access Project in calling on Congress to restore the Fairness Doctrine:

By restoring a diversity of fact and opinion to programming, Fairness Doctrine legislation restores a concept that has been lost since the 1980s -- that because the public owns the airwaves, the public is entitled to be adequately informed by the broadcasters of news and opinion. Slaughter's bill puts this fundamental issue as well as the responsibility of broadcasters back on the agenda: "A broadcast license confers the right to use a valuable public resource and a broadcaster is therefore required to utilize that resource as a trustee for the American people."

Learn more, and sign a petition in support of the Fairness Doctrine, at http://www.fairnessdoctrine.com.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. One of the top 3 things on my wish list.
Signed and forwarded to 6 friends. :bounce:

Thanks, Eloriel :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. David Brock supports this petition drive
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Would it apply to radio?
Would Air America Radio have to stop its current format?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StrongbadTehAwesome Donating Member (623 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. if it/they did...
Rush and Hannity and others would too. I think we'd come out ahead in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. No. I believe it will increase AAR circulation
If it works, stations will pick up shows. For instance, Rush/Franken rather than Rush/Hannity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Done. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StrongbadTehAwesome Donating Member (623 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. a little history of the Fairness Doctrine
from the same site:

"In 1986, a federal court of appeals ruled that the Fairness Doctrine was not law and could be overturned without Congressional approval. Congress responded by passing a bill in 1987 to establish the doctrine as law. It received 3-1 support in the House and 2-1 support in the Senate. The support was broadly bipartisan, with even Republicans like Newt Gingrich and Jesse Helms voting in favor of it. But Reagan vetoed it, and Congress did not override the veto.

Reagan's FCC -- which was staffed by former corporate media personnel hostile to the Fairness Doctrine -- wasted no time abolishing it.

Congress attempted again in 1993 to resurrect the law. But the bill was killed when Rush Limbaugh orchestrated a massive public relations campaign against it, complaining that Congress was about to muzzle him with the "Hush Rush Law." (Rush would not have been censored; the stations would simply have had to give equal time to liberals.)"

http://www.fairnessdoctrine.com/history/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. Gee Rush didn't like it? All the more reason to reinstate it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ima Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. my translation
" It received 3-1 support in the House and 2-1 support in the Senate. The support was broadly bipartisan, with even Republicans like Newt Gingrich and Jesse Helms voting in favor of it. But Reagan vetoed it, and Congress did not override the veto"

Bush 1 vetoed it. Reagan wasn't calling any shots, after the shooting his mind deteriorated rapidly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The River Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. No. 1 on my "To Do" List
Without a balanced media democracy is in grave danger.
If Rush gets 3 hours to preach hatred and division
then Ed Schultz should get 3 hours immediately following
to expose him as the drug addled fascist shill he is.
We are a divided nation because of all the hatred and
division that we have been exposed to for the past dozen
years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. woo hoo is right!
thanks! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kick....Kick....Kick......YES! Return the Fairness Doctrine!!!
Doesn't the rightful return of this idea just make your heart sing!!!:

"...that because the public owns the airwaves,...a broadcaster is therefore required to utilize that resource as a trustee for the American people."

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. No! There are hundreds of channels now, the FD was for 3 channels!!!!
</idioticlibertarianrant>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. Signed and delivered...
Equal time for bias:

Rush/Franken
Savage/Mike Malloy:)

Won't it be refreshing to listen to dialogue rather than dogmatism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. The 'Real Deal'.....if you want REAL "fair and balanced" reporting
....not the faux (french for 'fake' type...i.e., FOX (faux) news)...the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE....will make the media deliver! It gives honest journalists the 'tools' to deliver, because the media outlets they work for MUST, by law, give equal time! (This USED to be required, but since the Reagon-era this isn't true anymore....it's NOT REQUIRED BY LAW. So, all these years later....look at the dishonest/whoring/leading/Pravda-esque media we have now!!!

The Fairness Doctrine REQUIRES that media outlets must give equal time for varying viewpoints.

If you want HONEST NEWS, heck, if you want NEWS and not info-tainment! ....you want the Fairness Doctrine Reinstated!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsConduct Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. Thanks! It sure couldn't hurt to have some fairness somewhere. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
16. This is just the beginning of the work we will need to do over
the next 8 years to clean up the mess.

It will be an exciting time to be alive, to see this country regain its standing in the world, to be part of rebuilding our national unity, to begin teaching our children again what it means to be a fully vested citizen of this country and the world.

It's gonna be hard work doin the hard work, but oh, so satisfying.

I used to have jealousy over the fancy thinktanks that the Republicans used to plot the debacle they unleashed on us with Bush, but now I see that with the internets, we've got an even bigger one, and I love how it's totally OPEN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yep - there's much work to be done....
to un-do the mess. And I agree that 'think-tanks' will never rival 'do-tanks' (or DU-tanks, if you will) ;-)

Kerry, assuming he wins, won't get any free-pass with me (or many other Americans, I believe)...we've become somewhat 'wiser'....8 years is not 'assumed'.

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
17. I'm like...so opposed to this shit
Edited on Sat Oct-30-04 02:07 AM by HEyHEY
Really.
Okay yes I'm jokin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4MoreYearsOfHell Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
19. done...
thanks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC