Bush* has no right to criticize Kerry's pre-911 record:

[mediaman007]

Prior to 9-11 Bush* did nothing about terrorism. He had the information from Clinton, he had the terrorism report from the Gary Hart's terrorism committee, he had reports from Richard Clarke and the CIA/FBI. He did nothing.

They have no right to hammer Kerry's record prior to 9-11. As Bush* said, the World changed after that date. In fact, Kerry's work on terrorism far out distanced anything the Bush* administration had accomplished.

If Bush* doesn't have to take the hit for being on duty on 9-11, Kerry is just as clear.

[MSgt213]

1. Bush has no record to run on. All he does is criticize whatever Kerry

says. Listen to his speeches. There is absolutely nothing in there. He's got control of all 3 branches of government and has done nothing and has plans to do nothing.

[Mz Pip]

2. To add to that

Bush misleads on Kerry's Senate record. What was Bush doing 20 years ago? What oil company what he driving into bankruptcy? How much money was he collecting from the Saudis to bail him out?

Bush has no record of anything positive. So he makes up cute talking points like: Freedom is on the march and We're turning the corner. Pathetic.

MzPip
:dem: