|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:37 PM Original message |
Question; can the lying, stinking piece of pig poop pardon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spiffarino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwheeler31 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. So dick can get off scott free? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Yes he can. Check this link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maiden England (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 11:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. great, now he can finally be accountable for his whole administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 11:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xray s (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
2. Ah!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. They are so up a creek |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ogradda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
4. well in a different thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't know. I said he couldn't either, but I was told that was wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. Yes, he can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-31-04 01:35 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. No. President Nixon got President Ford to pardon himself, instead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-31-04 09:51 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. The discussion was part of Nixon's ouster many years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwenos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
9. It's Never Been Attempted, But |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spiffarino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-31-04 01:28 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. That's a surprise to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. It is an abuse of the powers of the president, but not forbidden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
11. It's amazing. Someone mentions "lying, stinking piece of pig poop" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ROH (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
12. Pardon Rationale |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-04 11:18 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. A Constitutional amendment is in order |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zydeco (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-31-04 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
18. I thought someone had to be convicted before they could be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-31-04 09:56 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Pre-emptive pardoning? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoffnung (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-31-04 02:11 AM Response to Original message |
19. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-31-04 10:00 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. incorrect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-31-04 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
23. Plus - since no charges have been brought against anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-31-04 09:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. It's been pointed out repeatedly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC