Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

REWIND TO LATE 2002: What would you have done RE Iraq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 05:30 PM
Original message
Poll question: REWIND TO LATE 2002: What would you have done RE Iraq?
REWIND TO LATE 2002: What would you have done RE Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lifting sanctions
was probably politically too expensive. I do think Saddam (the incarnate of evil itself) was keeping a lid on the volatility we are unfortunately subjecting our brave men and women to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. None of the above
continue inspections, take out (with missiles and air strikes) any sites denied to the inspectors immediately when it happens, take out an army unit once a week to force the Iraq military to turn on Saddam themselves. In any military dictatorship there are always ambitious officers looking for the chance to advance through a coup or an assassination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Continue inspections and
Sanctions. Try to make an environment for political democracy. Say sanctions will be lifted if election is held. If democracy doesnt take hold, than continue the policy of containment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. The sanctions were doing a lot of harm internally...
... to civilians and there was some intelligence suggesting that Hussein was using that harm to blame the United States. When US troops were being massed in Kuwait, there was also some talk through Syrian back channels that Hussein wanted to negotiate an exit strategy for himself and his family.

With a little clever diplomacy, the United States could have convinced the UN to bring in a significant international peacekeeping force under the rubric of overseeing international aid distribution under "modified" sanctions (using this to leverage a deal with Hussein for his exit, with no protection guaranteed for him against international courts once he was out of the country).

Within two or three months, the local police could have been brought under the control of the peacekeeping force, an international tribunal could have been readied to assume control when Hussein took off, and when Hussein had disappeared, the UN could announce that it would be structuring elections immediately. Arms inspectors would continue to search for weapons and monitor Iraqi arms activities. International peacekeepers might have also been able to dismantle some of the intelligence agencies in a way that would have provided useful information.

Cities would be intact, few if any civilian lives would be lost, and if the Iraqi military attempted a coup as Hussein departed, military installations could be destroyed first, without harming civilian areas, and without the need for invading US and British troops.

The necessity for reconstruction would have been minimal, Hussein's status as a fugitive would have been no different than it was at the beginning of the invasion, and the police force would be under international control, so some measure of order might be maintained.

Most importantly, the Iraqi people wouldn't be blaming the Americans for throwing their country into chaos.

It would certainly have been preferable to try that first, rather than what Bush and the neo-cons were determined to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Other: Reform sanctions
The goal of the sanctions was to make Saddam's government weaker, and the people stronger, so that he would be overthrown. They ended up doing the opposite. There were proposals on the table to reform the sanctions so that they would more effectively do their job, but they were never taken up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC