UdoKier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 05:30 PM
Original message |
Poll question: REWIND TO LATE 2002: What would you have done RE Iraq? |
|
REWIND TO LATE 2002: What would you have done RE Iraq?
|
are_we_united_yet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
was probably politically too expensive. I do think Saddam (the incarnate of evil itself) was keeping a lid on the volatility we are unfortunately subjecting our brave men and women to.
|
POAS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
continue inspections, take out (with missiles and air strikes) any sites denied to the inspectors immediately when it happens, take out an army unit once a week to force the Iraq military to turn on Saddam themselves. In any military dictatorship there are always ambitious officers looking for the chance to advance through a coup or an assassination.
|
BayCityProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Continue inspections and |
|
Sanctions. Try to make an environment for political democracy. Say sanctions will be lifted if election is held. If democracy doesnt take hold, than continue the policy of containment.
|
punpirate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The sanctions were doing a lot of harm internally... |
|
... to civilians and there was some intelligence suggesting that Hussein was using that harm to blame the United States. When US troops were being massed in Kuwait, there was also some talk through Syrian back channels that Hussein wanted to negotiate an exit strategy for himself and his family.
With a little clever diplomacy, the United States could have convinced the UN to bring in a significant international peacekeeping force under the rubric of overseeing international aid distribution under "modified" sanctions (using this to leverage a deal with Hussein for his exit, with no protection guaranteed for him against international courts once he was out of the country).
Within two or three months, the local police could have been brought under the control of the peacekeeping force, an international tribunal could have been readied to assume control when Hussein took off, and when Hussein had disappeared, the UN could announce that it would be structuring elections immediately. Arms inspectors would continue to search for weapons and monitor Iraqi arms activities. International peacekeepers might have also been able to dismantle some of the intelligence agencies in a way that would have provided useful information.
Cities would be intact, few if any civilian lives would be lost, and if the Iraqi military attempted a coup as Hussein departed, military installations could be destroyed first, without harming civilian areas, and without the need for invading US and British troops.
The necessity for reconstruction would have been minimal, Hussein's status as a fugitive would have been no different than it was at the beginning of the invasion, and the police force would be under international control, so some measure of order might be maintained.
Most importantly, the Iraqi people wouldn't be blaming the Americans for throwing their country into chaos.
It would certainly have been preferable to try that first, rather than what Bush and the neo-cons were determined to do.
|
kiahzero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 06:10 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Other: Reform sanctions |
|
The goal of the sanctions was to make Saddam's government weaker, and the people stronger, so that he would be overthrown. They ended up doing the opposite. There were proposals on the table to reform the sanctions so that they would more effectively do their job, but they were never taken up.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:55 PM
Response to Original message |