Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What are We Going to DO if the Bushies Try to Steal the Election (Again)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 07:59 AM
Original message
What are We Going to DO if the Bushies Try to Steal the Election (Again)
Edited on Mon Nov-01-04 08:00 AM by seemslikeadream
posted by jambojonusa in LBN

What are We Going to DO if the Bushies Try to Steal the Election (Again) ?

What I can figure from the best data that is available is that, John Kerry will win the Presidency. Unless......the election gets stolen....again.

From what I'm seeing being reported (the news reporting of GOP dirty tricks and shenanigans is getting pretty thick), this is a very distinct probability.

A clear Bush win would be one thing. Unlike the Republicans, if it was a fair fight and we lost, I'd accept the dismal fact of another four years of unending Republican rule and work on hunkering down and surviving it...and working doubly hard to beat them in the next election. (But there never is and never has been anything fair about a strongarmedthugmantakingover.)

Fair? It doesn't appear to be shaping up that way. Does it?

What this posting is all about is the big What If?

In this worst case scenario, which appears to be a distinct possibility, the question would then be-

What Are We Going To Do About It? So who has the contingency plan?
And how can I help?

In 2000, the Dem leadership wasn't ready for this and essentially wimped out.

It doesn't look like that is the case this time around. Good.

However, Kerry will need our help if that's the case, as much as he needs it now. Sitting at home glued to the TV and screaming about it is not a good answer. So what is?

There are some who are calling out already, to take to the streets if need be.

What other choice would there be but a popular massive uprising?
Without the backing of We the People redressing a grievance out on OUR streets, the courts would almost certainly end up giving it to the victory to Bush again.

If it came to that,our man Kerry will need popular back-up.

These next two links are posted elsewhere on DU.
My thanks to those who posted them. For if it came to another stolen election they will become incredibly relevant.

The people behind them are prepared for such a moment.

http://nov3.us /

So sign the pledge aye? Along with some of America's staunchest luminaries for our freedom. That we will, in the eventuality of another stolen election, take to the streets. There is strength and power in numbers. It would have to be massive in order to have any effect on an uncaring powerful elite. This site also has an Directory of Local Actions page, where you can see what's happening in your area.

also there's:
http://www.floridapatriots.com /
near site. Makes me proud to be an American.

Here's another link. Its to an article, an appeal about "Getting Physical" by Tom Hayden that is if nothing else, eloquent.

http://www.regimechangeguide.com/articles/act_gettingph ...

For anyone concerned about this election turning sour, please go read it all. Excepts follow.

For those of you who don't remember or were too young to remember, Tom Hayden is a former Yippie (Y.outh I.nternational P.arty) "agitator and a ringleader" in the Chicago Democratic Convention antiwar demonstrations in 1968. He was one of the infamous Chicago 7 to be tried for conspiracy against the US Government along with Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin. Then he went on to become a Democrat California assemblyman. Former husband of Jane Fonda... He has something forceful to say and something important to ask about this election:

excerpts from-Getting Physical:

"Not since the 1930s have the labor, civil rights and peace movements been this unified in a presidential campaign, and almost never before have the raw realities of power been so flagrantly exposed behind the showcasing of democracy American-style.

<snip>

It will get worse in the days ahead. Many Americans will have to push their way through the resistance of Republican operatives seeking to obstruct the right to vote. I predict it will get physical.

Remember the white riot staged by Republican congressional staffers, many of them flown in on Enron jets, to shut down the Florida vote count in 2000? Remember the Democratic leadership cautioning Rev. Jesse Jackson not to lead militant demonstrations that month? Remember the pressure coming from the highest levels to achieve "closure" and "stability" rather than prolong the battle over who won Florida?

The Republicans learned all over that November that force and intimidation work. It's happening all over again.

<snip>

This time elements of the Democratic coalition are prepared to fight back, unlike 2000.

<snip>

Republicans know that victory depends on impeding turnout, that the important thing is to interrogate people of color, the elderly and students, drive them away from the polls by any means necessary, drown the complaints with a drumbeat about whiners, and leave it to the courts.

This is a moment of truth. It has been an ideological maxim for many on the Left that the vote is meaningless, a diversionary reform at most. But if the Republicans are willing to use any means to suppress the vote, especially among people of color, how can any progressive person be indifferent any longer? The fact is that systematic efforts are underway to repeal the right to vote for thousands, even millions, of Americans whose ancestors fought and secured it, or so we are taught to believe.

Let us concede the point that the vote has been hollowed out by the power of money, the seduction of personality, the oligarchical arrangement of the parties, the growth of clandestine decision-making. But the very effort to render the franchise meaningless reveals its potential for changing the social order. The promise that every person is equal in the ballot box is feared as a precedent that could get out of hand in a society founded on so much inequality.

<snip>

In the unfolding confrontation, millions of Americans are learning the profound lesson that the right to vote is not secure, that plans to steal elections are made at the highest levels of authority.

<snip>

On Tuesday at least, the traditions of civil disobedience and electoral politics may converge. What are Democrats going to do if long lines of voters are blocked? E-mail John Ashcroft? Are newly-politicized protestors going to forget about their confrontational tactics for the day, or use them against the Republican bullies? What are trade unionists supposed to do when a Republican pushes or punches someone trying to vote? What are defenders of democracy to do when the whole world is watching Republicans approach the election like a seizure of power? What will happen when it's too late for the lawyers and the foul deed is done again?

If Republicans stand in the way of democracy Tuesday like reincarnations of old George Wallace or Ross Barnett, it should be time for the movement to say once again: move on over or we'll move on over you."

end quote

Really, I doubt very much whether Tom Hayden would give a damn if the entirety of this short powerful appeal were posted here.But I'm following the DU rules. Please, its worth the read. Then give the implications serious thought.

Here's a disclaimer:
I realize and understand that DU cannot be used for organizing events. I am not trying to do that.
With that said...there's a lot that anyone that feels this burden can do.

Such as:
Contact your local Democratic Party headquarters and other sources of organised activism and inquire if they have contigency plans.
They need our letters. They need to know they have our backing.
And that if need be we will be out there with or without them.
Discuss the emerging crisis with you local network. etc...
Start making plans...just in case.

From the posts that I have been reading, this bunch shows a lot of creative genius. I'm betting that there are veterans of past political battles willing to clock in on what they have experienced with the "street side" of the democratic process.
We'll figure it out.

If necessary, to protect the sancity of the vote, the same enthusiasm that we are bringing to the polls may need to be brought to the street. Are we ready for this? This kind of shit can get grim. However as Hyden pointed out, we may have few other choices.

If it comes to this, the best of luck in everyone's ongoing attempts at saving American Democracy.


White House argues to deny voting-rights lawsuits to public
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...


Posted on Fri, Oct. 29, 2004

By David G. Savage and Richard B. Schmitt

Los Angeles Times


WASHINGTON - Bush administration lawyers argued in three closely contested states last week that only the Justice Department, and not voters themselves, may sue to enforce the voting rights set out in the Help America Vote Act, which was passed in the aftermath of the disputed 2000 election.

Veteran voting-rights lawyers expressed surprise at the government's action, saying that closing the courthouse door to aspiring voters would reverse decades of precedent.

Since the civil rights era of the 1960s, individuals have gone to federal court to enforce their right to vote, often with the support of groups such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the AFL-CIO, the League of Women Voters and the state parties. And until now, the Justice Department and the Supreme Court had taken the view that individual voters could sue to enforce federal election law.

But in legal briefs filed in connection with cases in Ohio, Michigan and Florida, the administration's lawyers said the new law gives Attorney General John Ashcroft the exclusive power to bring lawsuits to enforce its provisions. These include a requirement that states provide ``uniform and non-discriminatory'' voting systems. They also must give provisional ballots to those who say they have registered but whose names do not appear on the rolls.

``Congress clearly did not intend to create a right enforceable'' in court by individual voters, the Justice Department briefs said.

more
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/world/10045248.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Contribute $$$ to the DNC to help with the lawsuits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. well of course they are going to TRY
the efforts are already in motion in several states. The question is, what will we do if they SUCCEED???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Take it into the streets.
Speaking only for myself...

I'm going to find some GOP troublemakers and go Bill-the-Butcher-Gangs-of-New-York on them.

(Just joking, Mr.Ashcroft. Maybe.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Drop science on 'em PDittie
my homeskillet, sholda tha show. Those nuckers can't scrape a lick, no diggety!

We ain't gonna step off, slow our roll this time!


Peace
SLaD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L84TEA Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. WE ARE GONNA CALL UP....
THE 2 BEST DAMN LAWYERS WE KNOW!!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Election Day Terror Drills Cheney In Command?


Election Day Terror Drills

Cheney In Command? --by Michael Kane


EMERGENCY REPORT!

Due to the critical nature of this story, any and every news organization is permitted to publish this story in its entirety as long as it remains unchanged and a link is provided back to the original publication of the story here at CLG: http://www.legitgov.org/essay_kane_fema_terror_drill_102904.html.

This report was written in haste due to the critical nature of getting it out immediately. I call all concerned citizens to help. This is a call to intellectual arms!

I recommend ALL reporters and concerned citizens contact the Office of Domestic Preparedness and BOMBARD THEM WITH QUESTIONS about the scenario, below. Call Marc Short at 202-616-8952. He is the ODP Media Contact for the FEMA drill, as described. This is too critical to let slide; EVERYONE must get involved. Let them know that WE KNOW what is going on. An informed citizenry is an empowered citizenry!


October 29, 2004 --A plan may be afoot to induce a national terror threat on Election Day to lower voter turnout and steal the election for Bush once again, but this time in a different manner.

At least three states have WMD/Terrorism Incident drills scheduled for Tuesday, November 2, 2004 – Election Day. As of May 8, 2001, Dick Cheney was placed in charge of managing all domestic preparedness related to Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). It is likely that Cheney will be managing all of the Election Day WMD/Terrorism Incident drills across the country. The presidential statement, which gave Cheney this power, also created the Office of National Preparedness.

FEMA’s website makes the national announcement, but omits any dates, saying only that this is a “training course” that takes place over three 8-hour days. The course is headed by the Office of Domestic Preparedness.

http://www.fema.gov/compendium/course_detail.jsp?id=353

The D.C. Emergency Management Agency has a Public Works WMD/Terrorism Incident training scheduled for November 2, 2004. The location is listed as, “To Be Determined.”

http://dcema.dc.gov/dcema/cwp/view,a,1225,q,586022.asp

Senator Dayton recently announced he was closing his DC office due to intelligence reports of possible terrorism in DC He stated he would not advise anyone to go to the Capitol between now and the election.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6243845/

Arizona is running a WMD/Terrorism Incident exercise on Election Day. UPI picked this up on their wire and the Washington Times ran the story immediately after Nico Haupt broke the story at http://inn.globalfreepress.com.

http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=868

http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20041012-032905-2028r.htm

http://www.dem.state.az.us/calendar/wc20041102.html

The training is designed around “interactive exercises and group scenarios.”

I contacted Marc Short at the Office of Domestic Preparedness who said, “This course is offered by the ODP (Office of Domestic Preparedness) Training Division through the Texas Engineering Extension Service (TEEX). The target audience for this course is state and local first responders.”

Texas is another state running this WMD/Terror Incident training drill, the same name as Arizona’s drill. The date is omitted and location is listed as “other,” though it is almost certain this exercise will be running on Election Day, as well. I questioned Mr. Short via email, asking if a real terror incident occurred on Election Day, would those involved in the training scenario be in a position to respond to it? He did not deny that this drill was running on November 2, 2004.
He stated:

"If an incident occurs, the decision to deploy first responders involved in this training remains with their respective agencies."

Lastly, let’s look at California.

No terror drill is definitively listed to be happening in California. However, the California Emergency Medical Services Authority website does list November through December of 2004 to be the time when training scenarios of “Protecting High Risk Buildings” will be run. Date and location is “TBD,” or To Be Determined.

http://www.emsa.ca.gov/data_inf/wmd_emtrng.asp

Wayne Madsen has laid out a scenario in which California could be “flipped” in the election to go to Bush. The WMD/Terrorism Incident Drills seem to eerily fit right into Madsen’s prediction: "...he Bush team will begin to implement their plan to announce an imminent terrorist alert for the West Coast for November 2 sometime during the mid afternoon Pacific Standard Time. At 2:00 PST, the polls in Kentucky and Indiana will be one hour from closing (5:00 PM EST – the polls close in Indiana and Kentucky at 6:00 PM EST). Exit polls in both states will be known to the Bush people by that time and if Kentucky (not likely Indiana) looks too close to call or leaning to Kerry-Edwards, the California plan will be implemented. A Bush problem in Kentucky at 6:00 PM EST would mean that problems could be expected in neighboring states and that plans to declare a state of emergency in California would begin in earnest at 3:00 PM PST." http://www.legitgov.org/essay_madsen_terrorism_and_california_071404.html

Additionally, there have been reports www.prisonplanet.com that CERT – Citizen Emergency Response Team – will be holding a “disaster simulation” nationwide on Election Day, November 2, 2004.

http://www.prisonplanet.tv/articles/october2004/041004daystilldisaster.htm

It has been well documented that on the morning of September 11, 2001, the military was running exercise simulations that eerily mirrored what really happened on 9/11. Such models included drills simulating hijackings over the continental United States, a plane-into-building scenario at the National Reconnaissance Office, as well as a bio-terror drill in New York City called TriPodd 2 which conveniently ended up becoming the emergency response center for the 9/11 attacks.

Are all of these Election Day WMD/Terrorism Incident Drills running in order to have first responders in place to respond to a “Code Red” terrorism threat during the election itself --to lower voter turnout and let Bush steal the White House again?

Michael Kane
October 29, 2004
http://www.legitgov.org/essay_kane_fema_terror_drill_102904.html
http://www.legitgov.org/

Editor's note:

CLG's strategy in case of stolen elections: Part 1, The Ballot, The Bullet, and the Grand Refusal --by Michael Rectenwald, CLG Founder and Chair "... postponed election, or the playing the fear factor for low voter turnout, are acts of terrorism in themselves. We are already being attacked. This warning is yet another in a series of attacks on our rights, on our democratic system, on our freedom, and on our self-determination." July 13, 2004

CLG's strategy in case of stolen elections: Part 2, The Revolution Will Be Webcast! --by Michael Rectenwald, CLG Founder and Chair "What are the TRIGGERS, what 'election' events will trigger the Grand Refusal? The following list is by no means exhaustive. The Bush regime may very well alter their approach to stealing the election this time. But, this is a list that will guide us... The Real Revolution was against the people and the Constitution and took place in 2000 and continues to this day." July 21, 2004



| COUP 2K | HOME | THE EVIDENCE MOUNTS | NEWS FROM THE FRONT! | CALENDAR | PRESS RELEASES |
| IMPORTANT CALLS TO ACTION | MEDIA BIAS | THE ONGOING COUP | OUR MAIL | PRESS RECEIVED | LIBRARY | LINKS |
| FAME N SHAME| MEMBER FORUM | JOIN CLGTM | CONTACT US | HOW TO CONTRIBUTE | REPORT MISSING LINKS |
Copyright © 2004, Citizens For Legitimate Government ® All rights reserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC