You know what would be almost at good as Kerry winning?

[NYC Liberal]

Watching Dubya announce the capture of Osama...the day after he loses.

Hey, it could happen!

:evilgrin:

[Vickers]

1. No, *France* catching OBL the day after

:spank:

[glarius]

2. Right...and then they say "now that there's a real president in charge in

the U.S.A.", we'll be sending troops to help in Iraq, (along with other former U.S.A. allies!)....Wouldn't that just make George poop his pants?....hahaha

[glocksters4kerry]

3. why the hell would they do that?

{join the war} regardless of who's in charge?

[Raenelle]

4. Because, in normal times under competent presidents, they are our ALLIES,

Jeebus. Remember Allies. Collective security. When we start acting like faithful partners again, so will they. Cowboy mentality. Why would they? Well, in your go it alone unless it suits me universe, I can understand why you would never understand why Allies are valuable, a good thing.

[Minstrel Boy]

5. But seriously, it's a good point.

Why would they?

Germany and Canada have already said, regardless of whether Kerry wins, they will not be sending troops to Iraq.

Allies are allies, but mistakes are mistakes. And Iraq won't stop being one with an international figleaf.

It is in the collective security of much of the world to see America quit Iraq, not make it easier for it to stay.

[TahitiNut]

8. They're allies, not accessories to a War Crime.

The invasion of Iraq was as criminal as Mussolini's invasion of Ethiopia! Even more, it was against U.S. law and international treaty. Changing Presidents doesn't change that basic fact.

[Selwynn]

6. God yes!

[Wapsie B]

7. Chimpy and the gang

being frog-walked out of the WH.