blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-04-04 04:13 PM
Original message |
More voted AGAINST Bush than any other incumbent president in history. |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-04-04 04:15 PM by blm
Wonder why the press hasn't noticed THAT fact?
More people voted FOR Kerry than voted for Reagan in his landslide victory.
|
FeelinGarfunkelly
(294 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-04-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I personally voted FOR Kerry.. spin spin n/t |
Worst Username Ever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-04-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
2. also the slimmest electoral victory for an incumbent since 1916 n/t |
SeattleDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-04-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I wrote that in my LTE today |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-04-04 04:19 PM by SeattleDem
here it is, sent to the Seattle PI. Feel free to edit the language and send it to your paper too:
To the editor: I'm tired of hearing reporters and pundits declare that Bush and his party now have a mandate to govern this country as they see fit (that is, further pushing their radical right-wing agenda). Yes, more people voted for Bush than have voted for any other sitting president in history. But the converse is true as well: more people voted against Bush than have ever voted against a previous sitting president. Mandate? Not so when more than 50 million Americans resoundingly rejected Bush's agenda.
|
skooooo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-04-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Well, more people voted period because population has gone up.. |
|
...so not sure your factoid means all that much.
|
Claire Beth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-04-04 04:25 PM
Response to Original message |
Zuni
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-04-04 04:32 PM
Response to Original message |
6. exactly. Don't let the f-ers steal that |
|
and it was a very slim electoral margin.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message |