Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why wasn't the environment more of an issue?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:46 PM
Original message
Why wasn't the environment more of an issue?
Edited on Thu Nov-04-04 08:49 PM by LisaM
All along, especially during the debates, I was just shouting for them to discuss the environment. This is our issue, people. The debate moderators ignored it - and only one citizen asked a question during the Town Hall - Bush's answer showed how laughingly incompetent his ideas and plans are - and it was never hammered home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because it doesn't matter
the rapture will happen soon so who cares about the environment. And haven't you heard? Apparently this election was a referendum on "moral values".

<sarcasm off>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quill Pen Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What happened was 9/11
The 9/11 attacks were a Repug wet dream; they illuminated for them a campaign trail on which they knew they'd never have to mention the natural world again. They've keenly grasped that their fellow Americans are too stupid to compute that their likelihood of getting blown up by terrorists is infinitesimal, compared with their likelihood of suffering cancer or other diseases from a contaminated environment.

You can't talk about the environment to an electorate that will barely spend ten seconds out of each day thinking about anything but themselves and their own. I would like to have heard a great deal more from Kerry on the environment, but the press would have savaged him for straying from marketable talking points.

Al Gore spoke extensively about the environment, and the freepshow labeled him "insane," "unbalanced" and "severely mentally ill."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. How does saving the planet protect us from gays getting married?
Priorities, Lisa, Priorities!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoceansnerves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. bush increased the wetlands by 3 million.
the environment was a non issue because bush had us beat because he did such a good job with the wetlands!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiosyncratic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm with you . . . I wish the environment was more of an issue
I want rampant oil and gas exploration on our public lands to STOP!!

I want the Bureau of Land Management to have all the funding it needs to protect the Wilderness Study lands.

I want solar panels to be mandatory on every house in the Southwest and elsewhere where sunshine is abundant.

I want hybrid and hydrogen-powered cars to be the norm . . . SOON!

I want the snowmobiles out of Yellowstone (except for very limited numbers that have four-cycle engines.)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because the corporations that own the government
and the media don't want us to notice what they are doing to the environment in the name of profits. If they people knew, they would be scared shitless by what's really going down. 9/11 was a cakewalk compared to what global warming has in store for every one of us. They know this. They want to make as much money as possible to keep themselves "safe" from the coming catastrophy they've created.

That's my short answer, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. You have to be able to "hate" and no one hates the environment.
They just ignore it or take it for granted. You will have to link the environment to the Bible and show that it is a mortal sin to not care for it. I can do this (I have studied the Bible extensively) but the media would have be on board to make it an issue as they did the gay marriage thing. And you would have to get the mega churches and the evangelical icons to want to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treehuggnlibrul Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wanted this too. I think that it would have had an
impact that people underestimated....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC