The digging continues: Fraud in New Mexico, complete with documentation

[requiem99]

First of all the registration statistics:

http://web.state.nm.us/avrs/COUNTY.HTM

Now, the fraud in NM is not nearly as obvious as in Florida, but it is still there. Note the registration statistics: Dems outnumber Republicans by over 190,000 registrations (nearly 20 percent of the entire statewide voting population by itself!) - Early exit polls showed Kerry easily winning the state, and inds breaking heavily for him, but CNN has since changed their data.

Again, like Florida, the big areas seem to go for Kerry closer to how they really would without fraud, but again, like Florida, not quite as clearly. Look at the little counties:

Quay, with 3,817 democrats, 1,838 Republicans, and a scant 498 inds. Somehow, George Bush was able to win this county by an absolutely LANDSLIDE 2,651 to 1420 - http://65.160.159.96/County10.htm - This is similar to the 2000 result, but Bush gained even more votes this year while the Dems gained none despite gaining registrations.

This happened over and over, even in tiny counties like De Baca (http://65.160.159.96/County27.htm), which only has 1,461 registered voters, 987 of which are Democrats, Bush managed to win by over 400 votes. Kerry got 280. Two hundred and eighty. (EDIT: This result is possible if 2000 was not also rigged, as this result is similar to 2000)

More information on other states to follow, but we need to make sure people see this for what it is: Fraud. Pre-election polls didn't show this, exit polls didn't show this, and registration stats do not show this.

It is fraud.

[uhhuh]

1. Other funny business in New Mexico

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x23054

[ibegurpard]

2. You can't go with registration figures

As proof of fraud. People have been voting against what their registration is for years.
Could it be something to buttress some hard evidence? Definitely. But the registration figures themselves aren't going to cut it.

[requiem99]

3. It doesn't pass the smell test. Here is why:

There is no way in hell Democrats either turned out in record numbers to vote for Bush or stayed home in record numbers. This election had the highest turnout in decades, and New Mexico is a solidly blue state, mainly due to the fact we've got 200,000 more party registrants than they do. Having a ton of independents and a green party that gets a lot of press but almost no votes doesn't hurt us either.

More digging needed here, but the evidence at this point is enough to get us started. NM was stolen.

[nolabels]

4. Sounds like a prime example

With good odds that it can be proven. I proving one with out a doubt could make the whole thing snowball. Thanks, for the info, :kick:

[Florida_Geek]

5. If Fraud could be drawn in one county...

"This happened over and over, even in tiny counties like De Baca (http://65.160.159.96/County27.htm ), which only has 1,461 registered voters, 987 of which are Democrats, Bush managed to win by over 400 votes. Kerry got 280. Two hundred and eighty. (EDIT: This result is possible if 2000 was not also rigged, as this result is similar to 2000)"

Questions:

1) What type voting machines?

2) Can you get a FIA on what voters showed up? For % of Dems, %Repug and % of New voters.


From that one could see, if the Dems stayed at home and mainly Repugs voted or did the number of Dems voting match the % of Dems in the county. If the number of Dems voting was high, for Kerry to get 280 votes is very very questionable.
IMHO.