Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The election was stolen?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LiberalEconomist Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 01:39 PM
Original message
The election was stolen?
Then counting "all the votes," recounting and investigating don't amount to a hill of shit. As Joseph Stalin said, "all that matters is who counts the votes." We have to be the ones that "count the votes." Yeah, US Senate and House seats are important. But, what is more important--especially in the near future--is to take over the Secretary of State offices in as many pink and red states as we can. With our people in power, they can either scrap the touch screen machines, and take steps to prevent or drastically reduce "ballot spoilage" in democratic precincts. If we control the election offices in these states, we will see more and more of our candidates taking office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. yes it was stolen
remember milosevic and yugoslavia? people dont have to accept a fraudulant election. they can deny it.

we just step out and say, no way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEconomist Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It doesn't matter whether it was stolen or not
we must control the electoral mechanism throughout this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaReservaPr Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Machine Error Gives Bush Extra Ohio Votes
Machine Error Gives Bush Extra Ohio Votes

1 hour, 56 minutes ago
Yahoo News

COLUMBUS, Ohio - An error with an electronic voting system gave President Bush (news - web sites) 3,893 extra votes in suburban Columbus, elections officials said.



Franklin County's unofficial results had Bush receiving 4,258 votes to Democrat John Kerry (news - web sites)'s 260 votes in a precinct in Gahanna. Records show only 638 voters cast ballots in that precinct.


Bush actually received 365 votes in the precinct, Matthew Damschroder, director of the Franklin County Board of Elections, told The Columbus Dispatch.


State and county election officials did not immediately respond to requests by The Associated Press for more details about the voting system and its vendor, and whether the error, if repeated elsewhere in Ohio, could have affected the outcome.


Bush won the state by more than 136,000 votes, according to unofficial results, and Kerry conceded the election on Wednesday after acknowledging that 155,000 provisional ballots yet to be counted in Ohio would not change the result.


The Secretary of State's Office said Friday it could not revise Bush's total until the county reported the error.


The Ohio glitch is among a handful of computer troubles that have emerged since Tuesday's elections.


In one North Carolina county, more than 4,500 votes were lost because officials mistakenly believed a computer that stored ballots electronically could hold more data than it did. And in San Francisco, a malfunction with custom voting software could delay efforts to declare the winners of four races for county supervisor.


In the Ohio precinct in question, the votes are recorded onto a cartridge. On one of the three machines at that precinct, a malfunction occurred in the recording process, Damschroder said. He could not explain how the malfunction occurred.


Damschroder said people who had seen poll results on the election board's Web site called to point out the discrepancy. The error would have been discovered when the official count for the election is performed later this month, he said.


The reader also recorded zero votes in a county commissioner race on the machine.


Workers checked the cartridge against memory banks in the voting machine and each showed that 115 people voted for Bush on that machine. With the other machines, the total for Bush in the precinct added up to 365 votes.


Meanwhile, in San Francisco, a glitch occurred with software designed for the city's new "ranked-choice voting," in which voters list their top three choices for municipal offices. If no candidate gets a majority of first-place votes outright, voters' second and third-place preferences are then distributed among candidates who weren't eliminated in the first round.


When the San Francisco Department of Elections tried a test run on Wednesday of the program that does the redistribution, some of the votes didn't get counted and skewed the results, director John Arntz said.


"All the information is there," Arntz said. "It's just not arriving the way it was supposed to."


A technician from the Omaha, Neb. company that designed the software, Election Systems & Software Inc., was working to diagnose and fix the problem.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041105/ap_on_el_pr/voting_problems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEconomist Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good, but if the Ohio Secretary of State were a Democrat
rather that a "meshling" the press would have more access, and many of these "mistakes" may not have happened. I mean a real Democrat, not a Waffen SS plant like we had in Florida 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bull: Investigating and recounting could do plenty
prove fraud and some SOSs might lose their jobs,

election outcomes may be changed.

You offer fuck-all that is positive with this.

If the fraud is not exposed you will never take over the positions

you call for.

get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmaki Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Right and if one more incident could be uncovered in Ohio
Like the one in that article people could start going on TV and speculating about it being systematic.

We need hard evidence of SYSTEMATIC fraud and the it needs to be repeated over and over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEconomist Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You want to tell me that the Bush loving media will allow a
turn around? Maybe it will, I don't know anymore. But my original point stands: we, the Democrats, need to take over the electoral apparatus in all states to allow ourselves a fighting chance in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. how can you do it, when it is rigged by them, I'm thinking you're B.S.
Edited on Fri Nov-05-04 02:09 PM by DUreader
you offer nothing but discouragement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEconomist Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. A problem with the American education system
You seem to know how to read but not comprehend the words. Oh well. You may be blinded by your cause as every fringe group that has infected this party. Hey look, don't give up hope. We can win this. Yeah, we can win. We just have to write some emails and send out some faxes and donate some money to somebody or another. La la la, skip, skip, skip. Man this is weirder than any of my acid trips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not exposing the fraud would be a grave mistake.
We need to call a spade a spade here. We can't be the party of political maneuvering. We need to stand for something.

And of course we'll focus on getting Dems in where it counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Those are good goals. Now, tell us how to reach them, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dandy Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. The nomination was stolen, not the election
Howard Dean at the beginning was allowed to set the agenda for this election campaign in but was never to be allowed by the Democratic Party leadership to be the nominee. He was allowed to carry the fight against President Bush, because he had supporters and money, until John Kerry could get the money to fight for the nomination. Dean supporters were duped into believing that Kerry won the nominate honestly and then his supporters were again brow beaten into supporting Kerry in the general election. Now the talk is about Harold Ickes being the new Democratic Chairman. Howard Dean would be a good choice and wants it but wait and see, he won't even be considered for the job. Dean supporters stab in the back again. All their hard work and money for nothing because the Democratic party will never accept Howard Dean as a leader in the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abelman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. IF that happens
I'll be ignoring the DNC and supporting Democrats solely through DFA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Start here
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIGHT! Take this country back one town and state at a time!
http://www.geocities.com/greenpartyvoter/electionreform.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC