Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ok. BBV Activists: Every search for a problem requires a solution.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 04:51 PM
Original message
Ok. BBV Activists: Every search for a problem requires a solution.
I am sitting here with Randi doing a fine job of your aunt getting angry at something, and yes, it is starting to appear(to me) that if she is correct and if Bev is correct and if you guys are correct, then there might be something to this.

But man, I am pretty geekishly inclined and I think you better get down in the weeds of the technological issues.

Without a superior solution you will get no audience. That is a fact. Without a way to show how well this can be done, without these questions arising and tainting our most sacred democratic process, you won't get the play you need.


It can be done. Open Source. An Open Source Organization, formed to create the definative, state-of-the-art, FREE voting software. Also free of taint. Linux or FreeBSD-based would be my choice.

I am too tired, too ragged to go farther on this. Read up on Open Source. Know that Eric Raymond and Richard Stallman and Linux Torvalds are the first people you should reach out to in this quest That Slashdot is your friend here.

I will have more for you if my brain ever works right again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. The importance of full transparency is multifacted.
One of the most important to me is quality control. If the source code is out there, the hackers (as is there nature) will tweak it to perfection. Just as all the commons, it would truly belong to us all, even if you don't know how to program.

The most egregious crime against our votes has been the privatization of voting systems. In an ideal situation, we would have nonpartisan oversight of the nonprofit organisations that provide our voting machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly.
This must be part of the equation. But with one caveat: The compiled source must be certified at the time of compilation and installation. Period.

This can be done. It just requires the information to move it forward and the will to bring it to fruition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. http://open-vote.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignoramus Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Indian electronic voting system
I saw a thing on the tv about electronic voting in india. They had these small portable voting devices that people would type their votes into. Then to count the votes, the devices are all collected and brought to a central location to be inspected by a committee and the votes are read from the machines and reported soon there after.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yep. We gotta do that
-----------------------------------------------------------
FIGHT! Take this country back one town and state at a time!
http://www.geocities.com/greenpartyvoter/electionreform.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm all for going back to paper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Australia uses open source evoting
Edited on Fri Nov-05-04 05:13 PM by BlueEyedSon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC