PotatoBoy
(364 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 05:53 PM
Original message |
ATTENTION CALIFORNIA VOTERS.. was their a paper trail or not? |
|
I have some idiot repuke telling me that there was no paper trail.
"You don't live in, nor voted in Ca. and don't know what you are talking about.
I received no such paper trail, just this sticker and my ballot pamphlet, and neither did anyone else in the 100+ line or anybody else who voted here."
Is this true or not?
|
andyhappy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the little strips that you tear off of your vote before you stick them in the machine?
I got three of those as the ballot was 3 pages long.
|
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'd imagine it depends on your county. |
|
I voted on optical scan paper ballots.
|
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I voted with optical scan |
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
nobody in America EVER gets a "paper trail" of their votes for themselves to keep - too much room for fraud (somebody could pay you to vote a certain way if you could prove you did.)
However, MOST of the state used a paper-balloting system. The ballots all exist. A few counties used touch-screen voting.
|
PotatoBoy
(364 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. I got a paper trail...Illinois |
|
I got a receipt. I have proof that I voted here in Illinois.
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Proof that you voted, but NOT proof of HOW you voted, right?
|
PotatoBoy
(364 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. Hmm.. i don't know honestly |
|
Well, you can tell it's been torn off something.. so there may be some indication that it was paper-based voting. (it was fill in the circle w/ a marker and feed it into a machine)
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
5. In my county, we have a paper ballot |
|
that is scanned into a machine, so there is a source document to count in case of a problem. Also, about half of the voters vote absentee, which are also scanned. Anyway there are ballots that can be hand counted if there is a problem.
|
Booster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I voted touch-screen here in L.A., but I'm curious why anyone |
|
would question the vote in CA. It was overwhelmingly for Kerry (like 7 mil votes) so what's the question?
|
PotatoBoy
(364 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. No question, just a really stupid premise put forth by a freeper: |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-05-04 06:26 PM by PotatoBoy
"Attention Tin Foil Hat Brigade:
Since electronic touch screen ballots are void, does that mean California's 54 electoral votes (the biggest prize of all) are void?
Here's a snap of my electronic touchscreen voting sticker I received after voting, now on my fridge:" (image removed)
What a fucking idiot.
|
fob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. Touch screen - No paper receipt, but I took pictures of every screen |
|
so I could have my own receipt. As for his premise that you would have to throw out all e-type voting, tell him this. It's not the e-voting per se, it's the cross evidence that points to fraud and I have no problem having any/all machines opened up here in Cali and they should have the same committment to the machines in Ohio, unless they think there's something to hide.
|
WillyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
18. One Theory Goes Like This... |
|
If there was voter fraud, and vote theft on a massive scale, they would want to make sure they got the electoral votes of a couple of very crucial states. In this case, Florida and Ohio.
But in order to seal the 'legitimacy' of this vote, they would want to make sure that the popular vote goes to Bush as well, unlike last theft.
So... you siphon off enough votes from solid Kerry states to put Bush over the top in the popular vote, without anybody catching on.
They wouldn't be able to steal California or New York outright, without causing major suspicion. But they could skim a few hundred thousand votes to add to the final total without raising an eyebrow.
I think that's how it goes.
:shrug:
|
wiggs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Orange County: e-voting. |
|
No paper trail that I know of. But Orange County typically votes republican.
Don't know how it voted this time because I haven't watched or read about the news since Tuesday.
|
ParanoidPat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Ten counties used DRE (direct recording electronic) voting machines...... |
|
.....and paper ballots were available for anyone who wanted to use them rather than the machines. (Thanks to Bev Harris, Andy Stephenson, Jim March and the rest of the Black Box Voting team. :hi: )
|
4_Legs_Good
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Our precinct (and county, I think) uses optical scanners - so yes |
|
Easily, IMO, the BEST system for voting. Computerized *and* a paper trail that the voter actually created.
david
|
NV Whino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:29 PM
Response to Original message |
|
1.Some counties used optical scan ballots. 2.Absentee ballots were optical scan. (My choice since my county went to touch screen.) 3.Some counties were touch screen (but no verifiable paper record). You could, however, request a paper ballot if you were in one of those counties. (Orange county, a Republican county, went to a great deal of effort to deny the use of paper ballots from what I've read. You had to really insist upon a paper ballot, they didn't offer them.)
Paper verifiable ballots with touchscreen machines are supposed to go into effect in 2006.
|
GregD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Marin uses Diebold Optiscan |
|
At the end of the day, a printout like an adding machine tape is printed. It's basically a batch dump of cumulative totals.
|
tinrobot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:34 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Some counties do, some don't |
|
Early voting in Los Angeles wad Diebold.
Regular voting was optical.
|
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Maybe the question is did Kerry get more |
|
votes there than shows? The pugs could have stolen some there to make shrub get a higher popular vote.
|
Beaverhausen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message |
19. I voted on a paper ballot in LA County |
senseandsensibility
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-05-04 08:15 PM by senseandsensibility
I voted "touchscreen" and received nothing. I used a card similar to an ATM, and handed it in to the poll worker, who gave me a sticker. While I stood in line, a woman went to a segregated voting booth and voted with a paper ballot. My husband pointed her out. Were these available in Ohio and Florida? If they're available in all the states, all Dems should ask for them in all elections.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 11:40 PM
Response to Original message |