Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "language war" starts here

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:01 AM
Original message
The "language war" starts here
It is not "Pro-Life". It is now "Anti-Choice".
Repeat this over and over.

It is not "gay marriage". It is now "Marriage for ALL People".
Repeat this over and over.

Is it possible that we at DU can create our own language? Can it start right here, right now?

You see where I'm going with this?

The conservatives turned a beautiful word like "liberal" into something to be ashamed of. Perhaps its time to turn "conservative" into something to be ashamed of. Any suggestions?

If we are to get back power, the language war is an important part of the battle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. I see exactly where you're going
and you are so damn right....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed, say it like it really is and the faithbasers will get so wound up
they will choke on reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
41. It ain't "faith based" it's hate based.
RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flygal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. BINGO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #41
89. No, it's the unconstitutional and/or intolerant theocratic bureaucracy.
Edited on Sat Nov-06-04 04:38 PM by Skidmore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juliagoolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. intollerant conservatives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's the spirit!
Any more suggestions?

Remember also. We live in a bumper sticker society so keep it short, sweet and memorable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Lifestyle Christians"
My little contribution to the effort against the Radical Religious Right.

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Keep it coming.
Perhaps we can vote on a few of our suggestions and spread them among our communities. Call up radio talk shows and spread these suggestions. Send these suggestions to our Congressmen and Senators. In person would be preferred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
46. "Lifestyle Christians" - That is simply PERFECT! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red_Viking Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Christian Taliban
And, some stolen from Morning Sedition:

Christo-fascists
Christapo

Sandal-wearing members of the faux Christian neocon death cult

I've used "anti-choice" for a long time. Very effective. Also, I don't call it a "partial birth abortion." That's horseshit and an invented term. The correct term is "late term abortion."

My 13-year-old daughter told some bushbots at her school they were part of the Christian Taliban. They didn't like it much. :P

RV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrishBloodEngHeart Donating Member (815 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I like Christian Taliban
its pithy and smart. The rest can be interpreted as anti-christian, which doesnt help us, IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red_Viking Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. I hear you
I consider myself a Christian, although I stopped participating in organized religion a long time ago. These folks have highjacked everything, including my religion, and turned it into something unrecognizable. These people use their religion like a club to bludgeon others into submission. They could not be farther removed from Christ if they tried.

Maybe I'll just stick with plain old "fascist!" It's satisfying and direct.

RV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
48. I SO agree with you.
A very good friend of mine is a Presbyterian minister. I spoke with him briefly the other night. He started our conversation by saying, "Are you just so depressed about the election?"

I told him that I wanted to have a discussion with him at some point in the future so that he could help me MENTALLY debunk the crap that's coming out of the Christian Taliban. He promised he would.

I'm going to compile a list of questions that I have about the CT interpretation of the Bible, and ask him to help me frame the reality.

I am not ashamed to be a Christian, but I'm ashamed at how some Christians have highjacked Jesus Christ in a totally twisted, immoral way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #48
69. "Don't Think of an Elephant"
A label that includes the word "Christian" will just get people thinking about Christianity. We want people to focus on their negative aspects.

How about "radical fundamentalists" or "intolerant religious extremists" or "Talibornagains" or something along those lines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #69
86. Maybe tie in Inquistition with the fundies and the iraqi torturers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. Interesting angle there
Are you familiar with any Inquisition-related phrases or names we might be able to use?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #90
94. Some methods
Rack
Thumbscrews
Burned at the Stake
Iron Maiden

Inquisitors = Sadistic & Mentally Disturbed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #94
99. I like 'em
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #69
95. You're right, you're right. Thanks for the input! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
47. Yes, and ..
"Radical Christian Right", "Evangelical Jihadists", "Bush's Fundamentalist Regime".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
55. American Pharisees is a term a DUer posted yesterday. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrishBloodEngHeart Donating Member (815 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. I like turning the democrat party shit back on them
Edited on Sat Nov-06-04 02:09 AM by IrishBloodEngHeart
by calling it the republic party, with an emphasis on LICK. See if they pick up on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. Have you read "Don't Think of an Elephant" by George Lakoff?
It's exactly what you're talking about. There are DUers who are already working on using language to re-frame the debate. Are you in? PM me.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. tort reform = gutting consumer protections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yup, not "trial lawyers," but "Public Protection Attorneys."
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I love it!
Keep it coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. personally I don't like "public protection attorneys"
That's one of Lackoff's recommendations. And to me it sounds too cold, too clinical.

I like 'trial lawyer's. I don't think we need to change that. Trials are great things - they are a bedrock democratic institution. We just need to reclaim the word and educate people.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juliagoolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
61. Advocates for the Public interest ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #61
113. Citizen advocates
Narrow it down from a general public perception.

It's ironic how everyone hates lawyers except their own. (I read that somewhere.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Awesome!
Edited on Sat Nov-06-04 02:15 AM by johntao
Nice touch. How about Anti-Consumer Legislation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Let's keep kicking this
so that all DU members can begin this movement. I have a gut feeling this will work if we give it time.

It keeps us on the offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red_Viking Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. And equal protection
"Tort reform" isn't reform at all. The damage caps only succeed in denying representation to the poor, who can't afford to pay an attorney an hourly fee. The truth is that 90% of medical malpractice cases are lost by the plaintiffs. That's 90% of the 1% or so that make it to court in the first place. Winning one is damned tough, since the doctor is measured by a standard set by other doctors. The average award is around $30K, and it's a tough road to even get in front of a jury. So the caps tend to remove the incentive to settle, since insurers know the max they're on the hook for. If they push for going to court, only the largest plaintiff's firms can afford to take cases on contingency, and they're very selective. In the end, the system fails the people who really need it. Doctors don't police their own very well (neither do lawyers, and I say that as a law student). Bad docs get to keep on practicing and rarely get taken to task for injuring patients.

We all lose, except the insurance companies, of course. They're the real blood-suckers. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. that's exactly right
Trial lawyers protect individual rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
71. tort reform = corporate protection racket
,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DjTj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
84. greedy insurance companies
...are to blame - don't believe their lies about lawyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
105. "Reform" as they use it always means "elimination of rights"
Not Social Security reform but elimination of your right to a secure old age.

Not bankruptcy reform but elimination of the right to be freed of crushing debt.

Not tort reform but elimination of your right to sue for grievous injuries.


The word "reform" has always had implications of cleaning out corruption or inefficiencies. Simply by attaching it to these things, they've already made an unchallenged case that Social Security or whatever is corrupt or inefficient and needs to be replaced by something else.

Whatever happened to the old Reaganite creed of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
16. How about Gun Safety
Control is so inflammatory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Short and sweet
Good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
87. How about making it Gun Safety Reform?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erniesam Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
19. any Christian who believes in
dominionist theology should be called a dominionist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. As in "Spiritual B&D"?
Or, "Spiritual Bondage to Dominionism".

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. I'm thinking of refering to this group
as simply "extremists"

Nobody wants to side with "extremists" or maybe even "fanatics".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erniesam Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. for this to work
we should use their own words against them; otherwise, we risk being called hateful or crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. Good point
It's something to consider when we make our final decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
20. "Right To Redress"
For the right to bring suit in court.

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Most. Important. Words. PLEASE
Right to Redress. In the Constitution. This is what we're about to lose with tort reform and privatization of the government. Right to Redress. We must not lose this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
24. Navel-to-Knees Values
The sex-based "morality" of the Republican/Conservative "Christian".

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
76. I call them "Panty-sniffers" or "crotch monitors"
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eurolefty Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #76
108. I like "crotch monitors"
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
109. Body-based morality of the right vs. soul-based morality of the left
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 01:42 PM by starroute
One of the biggest things we have to counter is the calumny that the left is not concerned with morality. In fact, liberalism is totally about morality, and we have to start making it clear just how that works and repeating it at every opportunity.

I think the heart of liberal morality is concern for the dignity and intrinsic personhood of every individual. This can be played in humanistic terms, but it can be even more powerful to present it in religious terms.

For starters, you might say that the difference between left and right is the difference between a religion in which *everyone* is ultimately worthy of salvation and a religion in which only a few are destined to be saved and the rest are damned. That is why the dignity of every individual is so crucial.


Concern for the dignity of every individual means that no one should be humiliated or cast aside just because they are old or disabled or have fallen on economic hard times.

Concern for the dignity of every individual means that marriage is a union of soul to soul and not of body to body, and there should be no impediments to the union of souls.

Concern for the dignity of every individual means that the poorest and weakest among us are as worthy in the eyes of God as the rich and powerful.


Liberalism didn't come out of secularism -- it came out of 19th century liberal Christianity. And the religious arguments are still there, deeply embedded in every core liberal position. We just have to pull them out and acknowledge their continuing relevance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
27. Pornochristianity
That perversion of Christianity which involves Navel-to-Knees Values, violent depictions of the Crucifixion, justifications for warfare and executions, the sexualized punishment of children, and a master/servant relationship between man and woman.

Use of the term got a post of mine yanked once. I suppose these days, the true meaning of the term is better known.

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
30. I argued with my mother about that.
I told her she was not pro-life, but anti-abortion.

She did not like it at all.

I also told her there is no such thing as a partial birth abortion. I told her there are late term abortions, if the life of the mother or fetus is in danger. I told her there were few of them. She did not believe me.

We need to keep hammering them.

Hippo-christianity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erniesam Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. would you kindly ask your mother for me,
what does she think is the most appropriate way of disposing of a early term miscarriage--for example a miscarriage at one month. Would she consider full funeral services, casket and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #36
57. Do you remember that scene in The Handmaids Tale where Offred and
Ofglen pass the funeral procession of women carrying a small jar? Yes, just like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
114. Redefine "pro-life" or use "life-affirming"
Or even better yet, call it "anti-violence."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GingerSnaps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
31. Hypocrites
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Hmmm....
How about "Religious Hypocrites"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erniesam Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. or, Sadducees and Pharisees
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagojoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
34. The Radical Right. This is what they need to be called.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. I think this one is a keeper.
The "radical right" phrase puts them completely out of the mainstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberteToujours Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
35. The Religious Wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
39. kick
kick kick kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pffarrell Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
40. Never use the word 'reform'
Reform has a real connotaion of changing somthing bad to something good, so people don't even look at what's changing. just say 'change'

I also hate 'war' - as in war on terror, war on drugs - it's not a war at all, but somehow saying 'war' just drags people along with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eurolefty Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #40
112. "reform" = destruction
Nothing survives right wing "reforms".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kilroy003 Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
43. We should turn the Discussion: To be announced forum into a
"Framing the Language" forum. We could brainstorm toward a consensus on symbolism and keep a running list of agreed upon language pinned at the top of the forum.

I'm in the process of accepting the fact that we will have be successful at framing our issues in moral terms.

Justice. Kindness. Humility.
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1104-37.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:28 PM
Original message
yes!
That would keep everyone thinking about what I consider the first step toward getting back our country - winning the "language" game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
44. We need to stop using
'straight' for heterosexual. It gives the connotation that this is the 'right' way to be, that anything other than straight would be crooked, illegal, illegitimate, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
45. shortchanging our country with irresponsible reductions in tax revenue
Lakoff spent quite a bit of time around the whole TAX question from what I gathered in his NPR interview...but we need to think of a few key ways to fram this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #45
54. Credit-Card Economics
or The Debtors!

(Presbyterians use "forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. Yes! Credit Card Economics!
We are taking out huge cash advances (tax cuts to the wealthy)and leaving the debt for our children and grandchildren to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #56
72. tax cuts = baby taxes
our children will have to pay the debt we rack up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
49. Ultra-right Bullies n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
50. "Red State welfare" seems to be gaining ground...
Let's make it as used a phrase as "Welfare Cadillac" once was. It's the new welfare: Blue states carrying Red states, with their high divorce rates and rampant drug use, their economic drag, on our elite, effete, liberal backs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. this one I really love.
except it will further drive their gnawing low self esteem and cause them to be more intractibly against us.

but it does have a nice ring to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #52
103. Lawrence O'Donnell spoke about red state welfare
for several minutes today on The McLaughlin Report. Buchanan and Blankley acted as if they'd never heard of the facts O'Donnell cited. They clearly didn't like it. Heh.

This one will definitely resonate as more people use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
51. Conservatives = Cons
(as in con game)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
53. "Liberty and Justice for ALL - no exceptions"
ooh - isn't that the Pledge of Allegiance?

"WE THE PEOPLE" means everyone

LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS

FREEDOM IS A MORAL ISSUE


I like the idea of a forum for re-framing the debate. This may be the only key to dialogue and (hopefully) understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
58. American Sharia Law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #58
70. CHRISTIAN Sharia
or the Talibaptists...the neopharisees...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. The TaliBornAgain
Remember Lakoff's "Don't think of an elephant". IMO, we should avoid the "C" word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #73
92. I've always liked "Hezbollah"
After all, it literally means "Party of God," and I can't think of a more disgustingly accurate discription of what the Rethugs THINK they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #92
100. The Republican Hezbollah
I like it! Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
59. "True American values"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #59
74. True *BLUE* American values
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
60. When I first started posting on this board several years ago, I started a
thread on this very sort of thing and it sank rapidly. No one wanted to look at how Newtie's reshaping the language for the Republicans had moved us to this point nor did anyone appear to be interested in how to counteract this. The language problem is pervasive and goes beyond gay issues and choice. Are you "elite" AND "Ivy-league". I'm not. I'm a short little woman in the middle of America who worked hard and studied while raising a family on my own and finally scored my MA from my state university when I was 38, only two years before my daughter got her BA. I'm 50 this month and for the first time in my life my salary is just above $30k. My parents were poor and my father only had an 8th grade education. I know lots of Dems like me--working class who also happened to be able to advance a little in life. I know even more Republicans like me. We need to be able to shape the language for people like my parents and their siblings, the children of the Great Depression and we need to talk to our children, whom we as a society have written off. More importantly, we need to speak to our contemporaries, who forgot the struggles of our youth and the changes they brought to the nation that are being reversed now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #60
75. Damn that was good!!
, we need to speak to our contemporaries, who forgot the struggles of our youth and the changes they brought to the nation that are being reversed now

IMO, that's something we ALL need to think about. IMO, it's the key to our success. We need to get back to the most succesful Dem in American history. The man who's name is synonymous with "dem core values" even though it's been decades since he passed away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juliagoolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
62. Hate Radio is UNGODLY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juliagoolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
63. Corporate Christianity
Beamed into your living room by Huge organizations that are lavish and full of hedonsitic values of money and power

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OutsourceBush Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
64. REPUBLICANS = PRO-INCEST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OutsourceBush Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
65. REPUBLICANS = PRO-RAPE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OutsourceBush Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. Anti-Christ Christians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
67. tax-relief = birth tax
Edited on Sat Nov-06-04 01:44 PM by rndmprsn
taxes are an INVESTMENT in the future of this country...

"but i know how to spend my money better than the govt!"...well can you build a highway with your taxcut? can you build the internet with your tax cut?...can you find the police and fire dept with your tax cut?...can you fund scientific research with your tax cut...can you fund the military with your tax cut?

we need our own wedge issues to divide and conquer the right...we need our own strategic initiatives that will take down their funding while doing other worthwhile things....etc etc etc.

-edit-

we have to let the working-poor know that we share their own values...hard work, personal responsibility, personal freedom, opportunnity and fairness...and most of all, WE HAVE TO STOP LOOKING DOWN ON THEM AND INSULTING THEM, we have to win thier hearts and minds by showing them that we have values that we stand for and these values are their own.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
68. For rural America: agribusiness and free trade = "big-city interests".
And "Conservative" = reactionary or "playing catch up"

I think "big-city interests" may win some farmers and ranchers to our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolo amber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
77. Pro - overpopulationists
Christian extremists. Right-wing insurgents. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
78. It's not "Gay Marriage," it's "equal rights" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Siyahamba Donating Member (890 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #78
88. "Equal Marriage"
That's the term we used in Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
79. Xtians
Let's make a difference between those who are really followers of Christ and call them "Christians" (pronounced: cris' tjuns) and then there are the "Xtians" (pronounced: X' tjuns). The difference? Christians believe in the principles of Christ and strive to follow His teachings and are more concerned about making themselves better people. Xtians don't care about the principles of Christ and use the Bible as a weapon and are more concerned about making others into an image THEY want. You will also notice too, that by writing "Xtian" that the base word "Christ" has been removed, much they same way they have removed Him from their practices and hearts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. Don't think of an Elephant
Call them "Radical Right", the "TaliBornAgain", or something else, but IMO we should avoid the "C" word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. What I am saying is....
we need to reclaim the word Christian! We need to show them they are NOT real Christians! We should not avoid the word, we should embrace it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. I agree with that
I just don't think using the word in a disparaging way will be seen as an "embrace" of Christianity.

We need to show them they are NOT real Christians!

I agree, which is why I would prefer to not associate the word "Christianity" (regardless of spelling) with them in any way. I'd rather associate them with the Taliban and other radical extremists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #83
104. How do you feel about the adjective "unChristian"?
I have never used it except about hypocritical words and deeds of people who pride themselves on their Christian virtue. It sounds rather mild, but they really don't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edmond Dantes Donating Member (524 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
80. Right wing = "thought police".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #80
85. Yeah, we need to turn that one around
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #80
96. The GOP has its own version of "Political Correctness"
It's time to finally turn the phrase back on them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatalles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
91. Red States and Blue States = Blood States and Blue States
Edited on Sat Nov-06-04 04:11 PM by Hatalles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m berst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
93. it is not Democrats whining
it is a coup d'etat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
97. It's only US, now...
it's only us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
98. Religious Totalitarians. Christian Totalitarians. Religious Fanatics
Right-wing propaganda.

Faith-based Bigotry

Personal contractual rights for all Americans (gay marriage)

Media responsibility

Separation of Church and State (an oldie but a goodie)

Republican Theocracy

Christian Jihadists

Christian war crusaders








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
101. Here are some of mine
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 12:38 PM by nemdaille
Anti-choice is good - I prefer referring to them as 'for forced pregnancy' - anti-birth-control - anti-women's-health

rather than including the word Christian or religion (which have taken a beating) I prefer - fanatical fundamentalists

I hesitate to use the U.S.'s current anti-anything-middle-eastern mentality to "paint negatively" any religious group

women's health clinic or health clinic rather than abortion clinic

OB/GYN or doctor or women's health care specialist or along that line rather than abortion doctor. Would you call your bank a notary because that is one of many services it provides?

Corporate government rather than government

Corporate propaganda machine rather than media - leave "main stream" out as that appeals to many "main stream" U.S. residents.

U.S. resident or some other less awkward phrase rather than Americans. We ain't the only folks living on the American continents.

corporatism rather than capitalism

multi-national rather than corporation

hetero(sexual) rather than straight. A good friend once pointed out "if you're straight, does that make me crooked?"

politically expedient(expediency) rather than (some instances of) political correctness, which has been hijacked and perverted. Show the speaker/writer for what they're truly doing.

linguistic honesty rather than political correctness (see above note)

use the term "paying lip service to" for the many cases of obvious hypocrasy.

socially irresponsible should be applied to more businesses and multi-nationals

economic motivations rather than business ethics - which I have serious doubt exists.

Okay, way too long here. I've had these ideas for lots of years.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
102. Get outta my brain!
:bounce: The "Anti-Choice" v. "Pro-Life" idea hit me about 3am this morning! Great minds think alike. :toast:

Ideas I have been using for some time is turning their "unpatriotic", "unamerican", "american hating", etc. claptrap against them. I have asked freeps why they hate America so much and since the appear to, they should leave...gets 'em every time :evilgrin:

jenn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaj11 Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
106. "moral values"
should be "fear values," if "moral values" is meant to mean anti-homosexuality and anti-women's choice, because those things are based on fear, not morality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eurolefty Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #106
110. "moral values" = racism, gay bashing & misogyny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
107. It is not "spin," it is DAMAGE CONTROL
Just like they're doing Damage Control by claiming exit polls are invalid.

And another DU'er points out, the election wasn't "stolen," it was embezzled. I think that one is incredible, because it implies white collar crime, just like Enron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eurolefty Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
111. "value voter" = bigot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC