Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Those curious terror tapes, the election, and their real intent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
hangloose Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 04:59 PM
Original message
Those curious terror tapes, the election, and their real intent
If we Patriots take our sweet time to prosecute a case against our home-grown fanatic through broad support of public sentiment as leverage to push an investigation, we will lose. Time is working against us. The NEO-CON's in this administration will have time and opportunity to plan an eclipsing event that moves the national dialog seeking “truth” and "justice" too another “staged” national emergency. With that said, I am afraid they may already be several steps ahead in their planning to preempt our efforts.

To Explain.

Karl Rove and his band of merry men are extremely savvy in the art manipulation. Is it not curious, that two (terrorist) video warnings were released just before 2 Nov? A constant reminder of the greater evil out there who will stop at nothing to destroy America. There were many theories bantered around concerning who was behind these videos. Two leading candidates put forth as the sponsors were, Islamic Fundamentalists or Karl Rove. I believe it was Karl Rove. But why Karl Rove? Common opinion put forth by both Islamic and Rove supporters was, to effect, the outcome of the election. I don’t believe this was the primary purpose.

To Explain:

If you believe the election was rigged, as I do, why bother in opening yourself up for skepticism and questions since an October surprise of some sort, was anticipated. How many Bloggers out there were spending time on this current event? Debating on another about theories, the purpose, the timing the message, etc…

In particular the OBL tape was brilliant, because it included criticism of GWB's handling of the 911 attacks (ala Michael Moore and the goat). This anti-Bush commentary would lead the average person to the conclusion that the tape was genuine (not Rove), otherwise why would the administration open its self up for criticism on of all things, Bush reading a story about a goat when the nation was under attack. That's the brilliant part, everything we heard in that tape was already out there as the public dialog. Back to the question, why did the Bushies manufacture these public events?

These broadcasts were sponsored by elements of our government to provide a foreshadowing and backdrop, only if needed.

To explain:

Any plan as bold and complex as stealing a national election isn't perfect, there will always be traces of the crime. The 2 Nov thief was no exception. And anticipating in advance that traces of their crime would surface, they devised a plan.

If the national noise rises to a level that may cause concern to Bush. A diversion will happen (foreshadowed by OBL, his side the Loan Ranger and their cohorts). I don’t find this far fetched since Bush & Co. have executed a similar plan, the 911 attacks, as a catalyst for the Iraq invasion. This case study is a similar deception but in reverse. The criminal elite will manufacture an catastrophic event to sway public opinion from questioning the validity of the election resulting in a rallying of the public around the flag and the president. Where is anyone’s guess?

We need to be bold an move ahead with the pursuit of the Fraud aggressively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
classof56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I just sent a donation to blackboxvoting.org
Looks like they are pursuing the fraud aggressively and so I am supporting their efforts. It won't be easy and it won't be cheap, but it's a start. Let's hope they prevail and prove the fraud. I'm guessing, though, even if they do, it won't make a whit of difference to Bush, Karl Rove or anyone who actually voted for them. But at least it can be said we tried.

Tired Old Cynic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hangloose Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm with ya bro made a contribution myself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. stepping into shadows....
each step the public finds itself on is quickly shadowed by something; they then jump to next and same thing happens, again and again and again.
the planning for geeb (this is, according to cnn/foxnews, the bush family's nik for george jr, in reference to john ellis bush, or jeb) to become prez was years in making, for example bush's texas driver's licence number was re-issued in 1995, years before anyone thought he run for prez (thus deleting bush's crim record from public scrutiny). the 2k election was a choreographed media event, with geeb winning despite fact he lost, big time. Then came a month's wait til dec 12/00 suckreme court's pro bush decision; then came 1st few months of the goofygeeb's admin, which was lose lose lose until step two, the WTC disaster. That brought on step 3 (osama and afghanistan the guilty ones) while step four the anthrax case, was playing, then step five the brainwashington sniper case (breaking news! breaking news!) while afghanistan 'war' raged, then out of blue came the flight 587 crash, with the NORC results lost in them shadows etc etc etc....
it's taking candy from a baby
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC