Sara Beverley
(989 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 12:56 AM
Original message |
The stage is set to ban "Exit Polls" in the future. So there will be no |
|
way to ID suspicious results. I'm sorry, it is sheer lunacy to have an elections in which the votes cannot be verified in this electronic age.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 12:59 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Marco Polo and other merchants of Venice |
|
would have been aghast at the single entry system used. They knew the merits of traceable documents even back then.
|
UCLA Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message |
2. It should be illegal to report the exit polls until the election is over. |
|
that way they can't effect voter turnout. otherwise banning them is madness as you said.
|
Eloriel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. affecting voter turnout isn't the issue THIS time, it's |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 01:09 AM by Eloriel
how "wrong" they were compared to "actual" results.
Edited to add: IOW, worthless, unreliable, ought to be done away with.
|
Cobalt Violet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Unbelievable , This is so surreal. |
|
I hope we can stop that on time.
|
Erika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Bush Is Setting the Stage For a Banana Republic |
Cobalt Violet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. They have stolen 2000, 2002, 2004! |
|
That 3 in a row! I'm freaking out!
|
PATRICK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 01:02 AM
Response to Original message |
5. They tried that before after 2000 |
|
Blew it off in the easy theft of 2002. Now the blind triumph of 2004 and the nervous overstealing.
If things go as they have for four years we'll have the instant analysis of Internet voting not the smashing of the crooked electronic system. Exit polls are collateral damage of the greater loss.
|
PATRICK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 01:02 AM
Response to Original message |
6. They tried that before after 2000 |
|
Blew it off in the easy theft of 2002. Now the blind triumph of 2004 and the nervous overstealing.
If things go as they have for four years we'll have the instant analysis of Internet voting not the smashing of the crooked electronic system. Exit polls are collateral damage of the greater loss.
|
Mayberry Machiavelli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 01:05 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Exit polls shouldn't be necessary anyway. There should be auditing |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 01:06 AM by Mayberry Machiavelli
of all races by a nonpartisan group. That's right, actual auditing of the votes, along WITH exit polling.
An international election watching group would be best.
But Americans don't see themselves as living in a corrupt banana republic yet, despite the fact that the rest of the world, and those of us who pay attention, do.
|
DeepModem Mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:44 AM
Response to Original message |
robcon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:52 AM
Response to Original message |
|
They are political speech. There is no way to ban them. There wasn an attempt to hold them back until the polls were closed (which the internet defeated.) But how can they be banned?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message |