Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The stage is set to ban "Exit Polls" in the future. So there will be no

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 12:56 AM
Original message
The stage is set to ban "Exit Polls" in the future. So there will be no
way to ID suspicious results. I'm sorry, it is sheer lunacy to have an elections in which the votes cannot be verified in this electronic age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Marco Polo and other merchants of Venice
would have been aghast at the single entry system used. They knew the merits of traceable documents even back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UCLA Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. It should be illegal to report the exit polls until the election is over.
that way they can't effect voter turnout. otherwise banning them is madness as you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. affecting voter turnout isn't the issue THIS time, it's
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 01:09 AM by Eloriel
how "wrong" they were compared to "actual" results.

Edited to add: IOW, worthless, unreliable, ought to be done away with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Unbelievable , This is so surreal.
I hope we can stop that on time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bush Is Setting the Stage For a Banana Republic
voting rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. They have stolen 2000, 2002, 2004!
That 3 in a row! I'm freaking out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. They tried that before after 2000
Blew it off in the easy theft of 2002. Now the blind triumph of 2004 and the nervous overstealing.

If things go as they have for four years we'll have the instant analysis of Internet voting not the smashing of the crooked electronic system.
Exit polls are collateral damage of the greater loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. They tried that before after 2000
Blew it off in the easy theft of 2002. Now the blind triumph of 2004 and the nervous overstealing.

If things go as they have for four years we'll have the instant analysis of Internet voting not the smashing of the crooked electronic system.
Exit polls are collateral damage of the greater loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. Exit polls shouldn't be necessary anyway. There should be auditing
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 01:06 AM by Mayberry Machiavelli
of all races by a nonpartisan group. That's right, actual auditing of the votes, along WITH exit polling.

An international election watching group would be best.

But Americans don't see themselves as living in a corrupt banana republic yet, despite the fact that the rest of the world, and those of us who pay attention, do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. Who could ban them?
They are political speech. There is no way to ban them. There wasn an attempt to hold them back until the polls were closed (which the internet defeated.) But how can they be banned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC