Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Were Mistakes Made in Dem. GOTV?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 07:43 AM
Original message
Were Mistakes Made in Dem. GOTV?
I just spent a number of minutes pouring over the data for Putnam County Florida (small rural country that went for Bush). What I saw was huge performance in Republican precincts and almost 2002 level under-performance in the heavily Democratic areas.

Did our GOTV focus to heavily on urban areas? Did we ignore rural areas that are Dem. strongholds? The Dems. need to take a very close look at their strategy before the next election in '06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lots of mistakes were made in the GOTV. Rove coordinated the entire GOTV
effort for the Rethugs. We had too many cooks in the soup and everyone was making a different kind. We can't let the 527's take charge of the GOTV, we have to coordinate at the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. right
our side also underestimated the Republican GOTV effort. there was an assumption that the 2000 elections would be similar and then we just looked at our increase in registrations and saw it as hopeful to our side.

but the republican GOTV included enlisting many who were already registered but didn't vote in 2000. most of bush's increase in support came from the religious right wing as much of their GOTV included religious organizations.the added anti gay measurements and the parental consent for abortion thing on the ballots probably helped get many of them to turnout.

we did pretty well with turnout, but i think if we had some idea of the republican effort there would have been a change in plans. someone from the kerry team would probably have taken charge and been more organized. they would have been more conservative with how much support they had and more liberal with the republican support just to be on the safe side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. We need to monitor the R's better next time too. And we actually need to
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 08:12 AM by mzmolly
start the GOTV effort for 06-08 NOW. The DNC must get crackin, Rove worked for FOUR years getting people out. He also polled to find out what 'hot button issues' were and put the so called moral bait on the hook to lure his herd.

What we need to do NOW is coordinate the GOTV for 06 at the DNC level. WE also need to monitor the Rethug GOTV effort. WE need to poll and ask people what they want to see from our leadership.

As you said, we did a great job with the GOTV, but we leave too much to the grass roots (who we need) but their efforts need to be delegated. We need to run the next effort more like a business.

Rove does two brilliant things:

1 he attacks his opponent where he is strongest
2 he learns from what we do well (GOTV) Grass-Roots etc. And if WE don't learn from THEM, were in for one long hellish road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. I believe we lost because of fraud.
However, we have got to have an organized campaign against these churches politicking and breaking IRS regulations.

They have us by the short hairs because of the groupthink nature of churches and the fact that preachers dictate to them exactly who to vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usrbs Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. ACT did much better at canvassing than the Democratic party
I canvassed for both the party and the 527, and there's no comparison - the lists of ACT were more recent and more accurate, and the organization was better and more professional, and to a certain extent, the ACT volunteers seemed more dedicated.


I also disagree about doing more canvassing in the suburban areas. A canvassed mostly in suburbs in NH and W. Palm Beach, and a bit in the poor part of Manchester NH and I spent Nov. 2 in the poor neighborhoods in W. Palm Beach. I rarely felt I was doing much in the suburbs. Most people in suburbia are not going to change their minds because of a stranger coming to their door, or more likely, seeing a piece of literature stuck in their door. (The ACT literature we dropped off was better than the Democratic brochures as well). The people in suburbia don't need rides to the polls either. On the other hand, whenever I worked in the poorer districts, I could actually help people get registered, explain about absentee voting, and on the last day, give people rides. My conclusion is that we should have concentrated more on the poor areas and done most of our work there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. If act did better, we need to know why. I canvassed for Moveon and I
can't say I shared your experience.

We need to get all these groups together and find out what worked and what did not.

Also I think we need to focus on all areas urban/rural and do a massive voter outreach.

We need to start the GOTV for 06/08 today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Were you pleased with your MoveOn PAC canvassing
experience?

I tried canvassing with MoveOn PAC one day, and we only found 2 Kerry supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. No I was not, I thought it a huge waste of time.
:shrug:

I had a similar experience to yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. We shouldn't have to learn all over again every election.
Winning campaigns are basic.

Polling to find out who are your supporters.
Registering your supporters.
Targeting precincts based on voting history. (Meaning put more of your resources into those precincts that will produce the most results)
GOTV your supporters.

Those are the key parts that MUST be implemented.

The other thing is having someone in charge that knows what they are doing and it is organized centrally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Rove ran the GOTV from inside the White House over 4 years
They went church by church temple by temple etc.

It is hard to make up ground on a taxpayer funded operation like that especially when you have the President calling the preacher/priest to enlist their support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Democratic Senators and Congresspersons should start
calling churches now to prepare for 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. In close elections, we really can't afford to ignore anyone, but
that did happen in areas of York, Pa, where we focused on the city primarily. What it comes down to, is two things: Time, and Manpower.

I think that the general thought process is that no one pays attention to an election until close to election day. I wanted to register voters last spring but nothing really got going here until the summer. We registered over 2004 people, which was our goal. But the fact is, voter registration needs to be an ongoing process, and so does communication with voters.
There were people who changed to Kerry thanks to information from volunteers. With more time and/or manpower, we would have reached even more.
I'm getting started NOW in my voting district. I want as many of our 1200-1500 voters as possible to get information on key issues as they occur, and to sign petitions of objection and make calls to our Congressional reps on every issue. You see, I don't think Wubya has support, even among Republicans, on issues like Social Security and the deficit. I think Republicans who voted for Bush would still object to many of his policies....I think this because I was actually told this, by them, over and over again. If I can keep up their awareness of their objections to his policies for four years, by then, we will have made converts. I have no doubt. For Liberalism is true Christian philosophy, NOT conservatism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. RIGHT , start early, but keep in touch so when election time comes around
we can be sure they are still with us or will be with us as that is when many start to pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Roosevelt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. Before you wonder about GOTV efforts (which I think were fine)
Consider this:

Looking at the Florida data by county,

Of the 52 optical scan counties

29 counties had more registered Dems than Reps (in some cases substantially more), but more votes for * than Kerry (1 county was opposite this, but the registered Reps were very close to Dems)

Of the 15 touch screen counties

1 county had more registered Dems than Reps, but more votes for * than Kerry (and none opposite)

Things that make you go hmmm...

http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. I made phone-calls for ACT one night, and they wouldn't
let me leave messages on answering machines.

Most of the calls were picked up by answering machines.

These were calls looking for volunteers.

If they let us leave messages, people could visit the ACT website and decide in their own time if they wanted to volunteer, instead of being forced to give a quick answer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemCam Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
14. ACT had better lists, but we
did a bang-up job of cavassing. What counties we targeted, I don't know...even though I was a full-time volunteer, I wasn't staff and wasn't privy to the strategy. I can certainly find out though because a staff member directly involved in GOTV is "in the family." There just simply wasn't time for philosophy or discussion for the last two months.

My daughter worked for ACT for five months. Her conclusions? We had all the money in the world this election and there are just simply more of them...two myths that we have held that have been exploded about Republicans and Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC