KC21304
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 09:02 AM
Original message |
I agree there probably was fraud committed on Tues, but |
|
we are hurting our case if we are trying to prove it with incorrect information. Everyone I know in Wisconsin voted on optical scanner. So why is the graph being used to compare paper trail vs non paper trail still listing Wisconsin as a non paper trail state ?
This does not help our case. I understand the argument that the computer used to deliver optical scanner results can be hacked. But that is not the argument being used with this graph.
|
riverwalker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 09:57 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Do an analysis on Wisconsin |
|
yourself using the numerous links and you can tell us. Who do you expect to do it, if not you, the repugs? Find something that DOES help our case.
|
KC21304
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I don't need to do an analysis to know that when comparing |
|
deviation from exit polls of states with paper trail and no paper trail, you cannot put one in the wrong category just because it helps prove the point you are trying to make.
So if I am unable to find evidence of voter fraud in Wisconsin, I should be quiet about someone else's faulty data ? OKAY.
|
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message |
2. The most glaringly inconsistent counties in FL |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |