Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VOTE FRAUD: Kerry's advantage of registered voters.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 04:12 PM
Original message
VOTE FRAUD: Kerry's advantage of registered voters.
Kerry always had a whopping lead with registered voters, even in the Gallup poll. The LV models were all what gave Bush the lead if he had one. So someone explain to me "How does higher turnout benefit Bush?" By all indications, registered voters perferred Kerry. If there was such a "hidden evangelical contingent" for Bush that rarely votes, wouldn't it have shown up on registered voter polls? Rural evangelicals aren't the types to have caller ID or cell phones. How were they not showing up in the polls? Where did all this "rural evangelical vote" come from?

Kerry was mopping the floor with Bush in RV polls, therefore high turnout = Kerry landslide!

Please, doubters, explain this discrepancy to me!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Diebold's crooked voting and vote counting machines
Suport Senate Bill S1980
Suport House bill HR2239

Demand paper trails
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harpo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. that's right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoBlue Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. The notion of a high turnout appears to be a myth
Voter turnout in 2000 was 55.3% with a total of 105,375,486 total votes cast for president

http://elections.gmu.edu/Voter_Turnout_2000.htm

Voter turnout in 2004 was 56.8% with a total of 115786304 votes for president.

http://elections.gmu.edu/Voter_Turnout_2004.htm

Less than a 3% increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. why the long lines then?
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 04:30 PM by JohnnyCougar
for my 1,000th post!!! :bounce: :party: :headbang: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Congrats!
And I second your question. Why were the lines so long?

Looks like a *, smells like a *, oinks like a * ...

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's BUNK. More People Going to the Polls than Ever
Did huge numbers of them get turned away?
Were they issued provisional ballots and those thrown out?
Did millions of votes disappear in Diebold's computers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Sounds like the argument I heard about the missing explosives
One Repug talking head said, and I quote, "It (the missing 380 tons of explosives) was only 10% of the total explosives in Iraq. We recovered the other 90%, and that's what you should be focusing on."

The voter turnout in 2004 was TEN MILLION more voters than four years ago. That's more than the entire population of some states!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wondered this myself.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Randi_Listener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Keep digging, DU'ers.
Something smells like shit here. We need to keep asking the fucking questions and digging for the goddamn answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC