Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's a lot worse than we thought.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
caduceus Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 07:40 AM
Original message
It's a lot worse than we thought.
In previous postings, we discussed the unreported attrition rate of soldiers in the Middle East (specifically in Iraq) to possibly average 3 to 5 per day due to injuries.

But according to these articles, it appears as though the average attrition rate due to injuries is closer to 10 per day, or even far greater.

"Indeed, the number of troops wounded in action in Iraq is now more than twice that of the Persian Gulf War in 1991. The total increased more than 35 percent in August -- with an average of almost 10 troops a day injured last month."

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0902-01.htm

And according to this account, it could be exponentially greater.

"The numbers of soldiers wounded in action are hard to come by. Since the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom, the Pentagon has put the figure at 827. But Lieutenant-Colonel Allen DeLane, the man in charge of airlifting the wounded into Andrews Air Force Base, recently mentioned much higher numbers in an interview with National Public Radio.

"Since the war has started, I can't give you an exact number because that's classified information, but I can say to you over 4,000 have stayed here at Andrews," he said. "And that number doubles when you count the people that come here to Andrews, and then we send them to other places like Walter Reed and Bethesda...""

http://tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/8736/view/print

So I ask the same question again. How can the military maintain this attrition rate?

Considering the number of wounded, the number of personnel closely associated with the wounded, and the family members of those personnel and of the wounded, this could be the administrations “Achilles heel.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quilp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for your post. Mike Kinsley of Slate reported this on NPR
Edited on Tue Sep-02-03 07:52 AM by quilp
at least a month ago. I posted his number of over 4000 on DU. Then I felt rather foolish because since then the numbers in the media have been in the reported in the 1500 range. I thought I must have just misunderstood him. This is something being kept very far under the rug. Once again Bush can fully rely on the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is pretty smart on the part of the Iraqis
If you hurt ten soldiers everyday rather than kill ten soldiers. As far as all related compensation for disability, it will be more expensive to tend to the needs of the soldier than to just bury a dead soldier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. How do they maintain their attrition rate?? It's simple!
Send most of them back. An injury short of permanent disability guarantees the unfortunate soldier a trip back to the Raq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. And it's probably only going to get worse. :-(
"Waist-deep in the big, big, muddy
And the big fool says to push on..."

-- Pete Seeger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC