TrueAmerican
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:14 PM
Original message |
Bush is considering Thomas (porn king) as moral leader of Supreme Court |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 07:15 PM by TrueAmerican
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The Bushes want a good laugh for their cocktail parties. |
|
Let's all show up to watch Congress rubberstamp this insult.
Nah.
George is breaking everything he doesn't understand. Like a child who never developed into an adult.
If it's mean-spirited and viciously spiteful, it's George.
Wait, did Scalia not lick his boots sufficiently?
|
xxqqqzme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
10. he said it was his 'style' |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 07:35 PM by rozf
he's spendin' that political capital.
|
htuttle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Anita Hill's main debunker now says she was telling the truth |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 07:19 PM by htuttle
It was David Brock who spread all those lies. He came over to our side.
I would have to think it would come up if they tried to confirm him?
Wait a minute. Nevermind.
For a moment, I imagined I lived in some other country...
|
Keirsey
(508 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 07:23 PM by Keirsey
You know more than you told in Blinded by the Right.
Tell us all that you know about Clarence Thomas.
|
WindRavenX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:puke: :puke:
Can someone explain to me how this POS even GOT on the SC? I remember a big scandal...but I was too young(6 or 7 at the time I think) to remember details.
|
hollywood926
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. It had to do with a pubic hair on a coke can... |
|
Anita Hill accused the POS of sexual harrassment and there were hearings and she was vilified...the usual. She was just a black woman, so she had no credibility in this country. It was sad.
|
WindRavenX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
That's so freakin' pathetic...
|
tanyev
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Blinded by the Right also covers the Clarence Thomas fiasco, among other things. Very interesting reading.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message |
4. There is no such thing as |
|
a moral leader of the Supreme Court. The Chief Justice of the United States is not and should not be considered the moral leader of the Supreme Court. Having said that, Thomas is not qualified to be Chief Justice.
|
xxqqqzme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. hell, he's not qualified 2 sit |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 07:34 PM by rozf
on the SCOTUS but there his self-hating ass sits.
I believe his nomination was the very first time a nominee was NOT a recommendation by the ABA. I Blieve it was george I that was the first president 2 abandon the ABA and rely on the Hertitage Foundation or some other RW think tank 4 nominees.
|
Jade Fox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:23 PM
Response to Original message |
7. A lot of people don't know.... |
|
that even before the Anita Hill/sexual harrasment thing came up, Thomas was one of the lowest rated Federal Judges. He was ONLY nominated as a token to make the Republicans look non-racist.
|
GreenArrow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Thomas' reocrd is "simply extraordinary!"
:puke:
|
elfin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |
11. It's really appointing Scalia |
|
without appointing Scalia - since Slappy only does what Scalia does and makes his decisions to closely correspond with Scalia.
The only exception to this that I recall was his vote on the cross burnng case.
Court reporters have noted many times that Slappy hardly ever asks any questions on his own.
|
daleo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
13. But Bush is a good Christian, isn't he? |
|
If he does this, will the believers get how they have been hoodwinked? Or is pornography ok now, as long as it is Christian pornography?
|
snippy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:35 PM
Response to Original message |
15. If this report was from the Bush administration, it is a lie. |
|
The Bush administration never even considers being truthful when it is possible to lie.
|
bunkerbuster1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
16. You're reading drudge, why? |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 07:45 PM by bunkerbuster1
Why do people keep going to that pig's website?
|
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Don't you mean "Good Ol' Clarence"? |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |