Fallujah will be a massacre!

[Dangerman]

Make no mistake, Chimpy will order our soldiers to execute almost all the population in that poor city, casualties will rival Vietnam's.

Saddam Hussein is an angel compared to what Bush is about to do!

Is there any way to stop this nightmare?

[arcos]

1. Nope, Americans had the chance last Tuesday.... n/t

[skylarmae]

5. so now what do we do? can't just let them die in vain. still grieving

am I and it looks like for a long time to come

[arcos]

6. I understand, but...

sometimes I'd rather not think about it. Just a week ago I thought this was about to finish, but now I realize we're only half way through.

[Solomon]

13. Yep. Bush got a "mandate" for some good ole Iraqi genocide.

[JI7]

2. maybe Tony Blair and the British can

if Tony Blair publicly says something . and maybe get the British public to pressure him to do it.

but even here i don't hold much hope.

[muriel_volestrangler]

15. Blair has no shame - he supports the attack on Falluja

he never condemned Bush for Abu Ghraib; he moved British troops into the outer cordon of Falluja, so the Marines (more suited to massacres these days than the Black Watch) could do their stuff inside the city.

[JSJ]

3. only one of many massacuers by troops against the mainly...

...child population of Iraq.

[OneBlueSky]

4. but they're only Iraqis . . . they don't count . . .

as long as US casualties are kept to a minimum, the amount of carnage visited upon the people of Fallujah will be irrelevant . . . won't even be accurately reported, since we don't track Iraqi casualties . . . they are, after all, only Iraqis . . . so they don't count . . .

I think I'm gonna puke . . . :puke:

[izzie]

8. This is my problem, I think you think right.

They will be reading this in the history books like we do Germany and Spain and how the German's bombed that country in the 30's. And it will be said. But why did we do it?

[moondust]

7. It's okay. God's on our side.

George and the Evangelistas said so.

[cali]

9. Saddam

is no angel. He was a brutal dictator who murdered hundred of thousand of Iraqis. One can aknowledge that and still recognize the terrible injustice of this war and the blood bath that Fallujah will be. Don't rewrite history to suit your means.

[Art_from_Ark]

10. If Saddam was brutal,

What do you call killing 100,000+ people in the space of 20 months?

[i_c_a_White_Ghost]

11. bush installing family values around the world

* picked the fight, now he has to finish the job

To * it's only collateral damage.

nothing like family values

[cassiepriam]

12. No difference at all between bush and saddam

[Solomon]

14. Sorry, go ahead and flame me, but Bush is worse. I don't believe

everything the media tells me, especially when they have to demonize and dehumanize people to justify killing them.

Saddam was a socialist, Iraq had a high degree of healthcare and education for it's citizens. Don't paint me as a Saddam lover, but I really don't think he killed as many people as our sanctions and this war has done.

[cassiepriam]

18. I stand corrected...

you are right. To call them the same is wrong.
Bush is much much worse.

[in_cog_ni_to]

16. THAT is the will of the American people who voted for the idiot!

THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT THOSE "RAGHEADS!" The will of the people is at work and unfortunately there's not a damn thing we can do about it. UNLESS this election is overturned. :grr:

[OctOct1]

17. Just spending capital.

He earned (stole) the right!
Get use to it.
He can now do what ever he pleases with the blessing of the people.
They were not shocked with the 1st four years.
There will be nothing shocking about this either.
Bush is just killing the people who hate us for our freedom.
Racists rule.
Keep screaming about how much you hate him and you will ALSO be on the list.
Insanity is the norm.