Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's the criminalization, Stupid!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Isere Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:19 PM
Original message
It's the criminalization, Stupid!
I have supported abortion rights as my single-issue for many years. You can, therefore, imagine my dismay over the recent election.

I am writing everyone I know to urge a change in vocabulary so that we might reclaim our message on women's reproductive rights.

Heretofore, we must abandon the term "pro-life" and replace it with "pro-criminalizaton." Every elected official who proclaims to be anti-abortion must be labeled as "pro-criminalization." That puts the spotlight exactly where it should be and forces the public into an awareness of the gravity of the situation. We should be asking the anti-choice folks questions such as "who should go to jail and for how long?" We must drive home the reality that criminalization is the intended outcome of the anti-choice movement.

Anti-choice advocates have used language to their great advantage by renaming a little-known and little-used medical procedure "partial-birth abortion." Who could be against that? The very term "pro-life" is a misnomer and grants the bearer a high ground that is undeserved because it does not take into consideration the life of the mother.

Could we please stop allowing our opponents to define the vocabulary of the debate?

All together now: "It's the criminalization, Stupid!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent. NEVER use their terminology. Never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Seconded.
The issue is not the morality of abortion. It is whether or not it should be criminalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaLynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. You know, I like it ...
When I think about abortion rights and winning over the 'other side', I always think about how I would talk to my mother about it. She is stridently against abortion and yet, not Republican. Go figure. Anyway, I think this might be a way to get people to think about it. You don't have to agree with abortion or think you would have one to see the dangers in making it illegal. Hmmm!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. There is a very persuasive case for pro-choice to anyone.
You just have to find someone with an open mind.

If your goal is to reduce abortions, criminalization is an AWEFUL policy. All it will do is reduce the number a little and drive it all under ground.

If you truely believe that abortion is a tragedy, then take the steps that are likely to significantly reduce it or stop it. Family planning is the only rational choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesibria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. well -- except as noted below -- MOST "Family planning" methods
result in abortions and therefore -- are "evil" (in the views of the pro-life folks)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The open mind thing is key.
Obviously alot of people assume anything that doesnt sound like it came from Pat Robertson is automatically filed under bullshit. These people are probably unreachable, its just a matter of making them the fringe minority again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesibria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. i agree --
the REpubs have used partial birth abortion as their "shock and awe" campaign.

We need to use the "no fertility treatments/no birth control" as our shock and awe.

And -- other than the fringe -- most will get that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Criminalizing abortion would throw a few more underprivileged women in
prison. We already throw the underprivileged men there, why not take the other half of the great unwahshed in there too.

This would be a boon to one of the greatest employers in the nation - the penitentiary system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. you are right, now that i have had to explore the issue
and talked with many many people that are anti abortion, my line to them is what do you do with these girls. jail. the breeder male, jail too. the kids, foster homes.

tell me what we do with those that break this law you want

i cannot get a repug to give me an answer. i tell them, you must.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesibria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. we also need to point out to these "security moms"
.. what it really means to be so opposed to stem cell research:

1. Stem cell research is evil b/c it uses a human embryo.
2. It is evil to destroy human embryos, even for a good purpose.
3. Since it is evil to destroy human embryos, fertility treatments that result in flushed or extra embryos are evil.
4. Since it is evil to destroy human embryos, birth control methods that result in preventing embryos to attach ... etc... are evil.

Therefore, both the birth control pill AND many fertility treatments MUST be criminalized as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I tried that line last week - nearly got killed at the office.
Ron Reagan made that point on Stern last week - in vitro clinics should be shut down since they destroy thousands of embryos a year.

My right wing nutjob co-workers went through the roof - "it costs $500 a year to keep them viable. Who wants that expense?"

I replied - "So destroying embryos for the sake of convenience is different from abortion in what respect?"

It probably didn't help that one woman's husband is shooting blanks after getting his vasectomy (from his first marriage) reversed.

Finally, since birth control and fertility treatments are the right of the middle class, it is likely these would never be criminalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesibria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. IT IS THE NATURAL CONSEQUENCE OF SAYING THAT
Embryos must be protected.

You're right -- but that is what will "swing" them back. Trust me -- the RW/Evangelicals and RW/Catholics FULLY believe this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. We need to remind Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell of the number of
embryos destroyed at in vitro clinics, let them run with it, and sit back and watch - could be very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Spirit of JFK Donating Member (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Coopting the term Pro-Life was a coup for them...
Face it, we are ALL pro life...

I think we need something like Pro-Life/Pro Choice.

And the need to be "Anti" something...Anti-Personal Decision, Anti-Choice..Anti-Individual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesibria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. ...
Being pro-9 month gestation period is NOT being pro-life.

That's their position. Once the baby is born -- she's on her own.

But ... she must be born.

The TRUE pro-life position is to -- well -- to be actively PRO-life. To adopt policies that will reduce the number of abortions, because more women will feel that they have the supports necessary to have the baby.

It doesn't mean criminalizing abortion -- it means creating a society where LIFE (not just fetus-hood) is valued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. And where people can make intelligent decions
about reproduction because they have been provided with proper education.

The real battle here is the battle to avoid unwanted pregnancies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. Exactly
Most of the people who wrap themselves in the pro-life euphemism begin to waffle badly when asked what PENALTY they would like to inflict on the mother....the Death Penalty?....Life in Prison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Isere Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. That's just the point!
We need to take away their cloak of euphemism! Let's force them to reveal themselves for what they are: people who want to put doctors and women in jail!
I hope everyone will pass on this language and take it upon themselves to correct anyone who uses "pro-life."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Pro lifers are an oxymoron's
because most all of them believe in the death penalty...

I don't believe that it is a man's decision to make regarding a woman's reproductivity.

When the partial birth ban was signed into law, there was not ONE WOMAN present at the signing. There were only men....

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/11/images/20031105-1_p35410-21-515h.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. Good idea.
They do want to lock up doctors who perform abortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC