Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA just changed a decades old ruling ~ that contaminated property

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:04 PM
Original message
EPA just changed a decades old ruling ~ that contaminated property
Could not be sold and/or developed without cleanup. Now we can sell contaminated property and a school can be built on it with no clean-up. New Bush* reversal of Health protections. I don't have a link for this so posted in GD but just heard it on AM Radio News. Clean-up is no longer required for contaminated properties. We can spend the superfund for War now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush's memorial to Mr. Rogers: Can you say PCBs boys & girls?
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. In USA Today they said they didn't change it, just
re-interpreted the law. Sure. Are there any EPA rulings left for Bush to get rid of? In only 3 years he's managed to set the environmental protection progress back at least 100 years. Where the * is the outrage????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Chill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Where is the outrage?
All over the enviromental community. Sadly too many people don't think the enviroment is a #1 priority. Maybe they'll change their minds when they get cancer from the pollution in their water, food, and air.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I guess the country is going to following in Texas' footsteps...
Bush contaminated Texas now he's aiming for all 50 states. God help us. SMH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let's ask him if we can bury the waste
on his ranch at Crawford.

I think anyone wanting to revise these rules should have to personally live with them, send their pregnant daughters to live with the outcome, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. In case anyone reading this is confused
The current *misadministration, in addition to stealing your money, dismantling your economic and social underpinnings, poisoning your food and water is poisoning the ground you walk on. Any questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. here's the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thank you ~ This is a lot more specific
Sometimes what one hears on Radio is distorted and it appears to be the case here. It doesn't keep the site from being cleaned just who is the person responsible for the cleaning. What it does do is let the property be sold before the clean-up which is new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yep.. and I am sure that they are falling all over each other
to claim responsibility and offer to clean up their mess.. THAT was why the original ruling was so important...it FORCED them to clean it up..

This "voluntary" shit is nonsense.. Industry has always done this.. Open a plant, pollute the immediate area, and then move on and do it again..

The will "offer" this polluted land at bargain basement prices and cut & run.. Their kids will not play on the playground that gets built 10 yrs down the road.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC