Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A different take on the Draft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 11:46 AM
Original message
A different take on the Draft

Democracy Now!
Monday, November 15th, 2004
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/15/1448219

<snip>

AMY GOODMAN: Noam Chomsky, speaking on Sunday in Princeton, New Jersey. Afterwards, he was asked a series of question, one of them was, would the draft be reinstated.

NOAM CHOMSKY: I think it's extremely unlikely. I should tell you this as a word of personal background. I was very much involved in the resistance movement in the 1960's. In fact, I was just barely -- the only reason I missed a long jail sentence is because the Tet Offensive came along and the trials were called off. So I was very much involved in the resistance, but I was never against the draft. I disagreed with a lot of my friends and associates on that, for a very good reason, I think at least as nobody seems to agree. In my view, if there's going to be an army, I think it ought to be a citizen's army. Now, here I do agree with some people, the top brass, they don't want a citizen's army. They want a mercenary army, what we call a volunteer army. A mercenary army of the disadvantaged. And in fact, in the Vietnam war, the U.S. military realized, they had made a very bad mistake. I mean, for the first time I think ever in the history of European imperialism, including us, they had used a citizen's army to fight a vicious, brutal, colonial war, and civilians just cannot do that kind of a thing. For that, you need the French foreign legion, the Gurkhas or something like that. Every predecessor has used mercenaries, often drawn from the country that they're attacking like England ran India with Indian mercenaries. You take them from one place and send them to kill people in the other place. That's the standard way to run imperial wars. They're just too brutal and violent and murderous. Civilians are not going to be able to do it for very long. What happened was, the army started falling apart. One of the reasons that the army was withdrawn was because the top military wanted it out of there. They were afraid they were not going to have an army anymore. Soldiers were fragging officer. The whole thing was falling apart. They were on drugs. And that’s why I think that they're not going to have a draft. That's why I’m in favor of it. If there's going to be an army that will fight brutal, colonial wars, and that's the only likely kind of war, I’m not talking about the militarization of space and that kind of thing, I mean ground wars, it ought to be a citizen's army so that the attitudes of the society are reflected in the military.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. A Good Example Of Why Chomsky Is Considered A Radical By So Many
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Please explain what is radical about a people's army -
if there has to be an army.
Or what is radical about thinking it is unlikely that a draft will be instated.

If that's not why you think Chomsky is a radical, then why do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have to disagree, Noam
because the disadvantaged are not volunteering in sufficient numbers and the brass have had to accept a citizens' army already in the form of National Guard units.

Bushco have absolutely nothing to lose and empire to gain if they reinstitute a draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spangle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Disadvantage no longer qualify to join
Many come from the 'slums'. Were at an early age they run into trouble. The military wants their cake and eat it to. It's a high tech military we have now. They need educated persons to run the high tech killing machines. They want people with "clean" records.

They want the kids that go to college. The same kids who do not like the military life style and pay. Who are also not despret enough to HAVE to accept the military to advance in life.

Years ago, while the military took in the disadvantage kids. The benfit was that it gave them a chance they didn't have. Training, eduation, a way out.

Kids with an educaton that went slightly faul of the law, the military saved their butts! Not any longer. Got a record or in the process of getting one.. don't apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederic Bastiat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Makes sense to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. NO DRAFT! If Nobody Wants To Fight The War, Don't Fight It!
The only reason the Dark Ages ever ended is because all the zealots
went off on the Crusades and didn't come back. Otherwise the Inquisition would probably still be going on today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC