Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Complete US Exit Poll Data Confirms Net Suspicions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 11:54 PM
Original message
Complete US Exit Poll Data Confirms Net Suspicions
Scoop.co.nz is delighted to be able today to publish a full set of 4pm exit poll data for the first time on the Internet since the US election. The data emerged this evening NZT in a post on the Democratic Underground website under the forum name TruthIsAll.

The new data confirms what was already widely known about the swing in favour of George Bush, but amplifies the extent of that swing.


http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0411/S00227.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KeireG Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Magnificent
There it is, for everyone to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m berst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. time to shift the debate
If people want to say "I don't care" or "I can't be bothered to understand this" or "we can't do anything about it" they should just out and out say that and go their way and leave us alone.

We should however, no longer entertain people saying "it didn't happen" and "where is the proof?" when what they really mean is one of those ideas in the preceding paragraph.

Short of George Bush going on nation wide television and confessing, this is as much proof as we could possibly have at this point. This is more solid evidence than a confession by the president would be, actually, because if the president did that I would suspect it was a trick, wouldn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Testable Hypothesis
An excellent opportunity has emerged today in WA State to uncover evidence of systemic disenfranchisment:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/18/02430/077

Something you may want to consider pushing as it is quite specific. It would call all the issues into a bright spot-light regarding polling company, media, electronic voter systems manufacturers, and would place both Dem and Repub parties in a neutralized zone. Carter Center, Common Cause, BBV, Votergate.tv, the European election observer group -- all of them, and more, could participate.

It's not about 'did you vote'; it's about 'your vote being recorded accurately and verifiably' as you well know. Let's push Stalin not just back into the grave but off the planet!

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Be Brave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. In the interest of good science,
please let's put error bars on this plot. Please. The exit polls must have a margin of error for each state. Where can this data be found?

Also, a clarification. When the post says "4 PM exit polls", does this mean 4 PM local time for each state?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is great... but....
Edited on Thu Nov-18-04 04:23 AM by George_S
I'm not sure anyone not already familiar with the problem would understand it. I had trouble, but then I'm dumb.

Let me see if I do understand.

As an analogy, if a cashier takes money 50 times and makes an honest mistake each time, there should be about a 50/50 split in errors: 25 times over, 25 times under.

If I understand correctly, you're saying the cashier came up short 41 times and the odds are so against that, that he/she should be fired.

Am I close?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donkeyboy75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. That's true...if you make the assumption that the cashier is
just as likely to come in over as under. Likewise, these polls only show fraud if we assume that they are an accurate picture of the actual voters. If there is a bias towards Kerry votes, though, this analysis is worthless. And we really don't know if there existed a sampling error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. If There Was A Sampling Error, It Would Be Ubiquitous
and all the exit polls would be off everywhere and differ from the final results in the same direction within an MOE. They weren't. In many states the exit polls accurately predicted final results. This means a sampling error is NOT the likely cause for the discrepancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donkeyboy75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Not if there was a nationwide bias towards Kerry.
Edited on Thu Nov-18-04 12:14 PM by Donkeyboy75
Most of those states that lie within the MOE would still be there if you incorporate a 3-4% shift across the board.

The only reason I posted this originally is that people mistake these polls as proof of election fraud. That ain't the case.

On edit: if you shift the x-axis up 2.5% points, and replotted the data in different form, you'd get a Gaussian distribution of deviance between exit polls and voting results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Then NY Exit Polls Would Have Shown A MUCH Larger Kerry Victory
for example. The Kerry bias would be evident even in states that he won, showing his margin being larger than it eventually was. That's not the case as far as I can tell. Many states were RIGHT on the money. Exit polls very accurately predicted final vote tally's. If there was a systematic Kerry bias it would be apparent EVERYWHERE. It's not. That's inexplicable if it's a methodological/sampling bias.

The exit polls are NOT proof of fraud, but they are suggestive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myschkin Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. ?

Why don't we get the Exit Polls from 12:20 a.m.?? - they would be more accurate (according to the footnote)...

Please post the "real" ones, balanced women-men (in the other case they don't take us serious).

Thanks.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. this is so painful
It hurts to see it in black and white, what they did. It's one thing to know it from various news stories and data interpretations but to see it like this...

We have had another president taken from us. Twice now we have had our elected president taken away.

Considering the magnitude of damage done to us in terms of our reputation, the debt this group of criminals has racked up for us and our children, the loss of so many lives, a needless war, it is all just too much to bear.

I never, ever thought I was going to have to live through something like this in my country. It is heart wrenching.


Cher

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, this is exactly how I feel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Deeply painful...
On my way back from Poughkeepsie yesterday, I stopped by FDR & Eleanor's gravesite. Don't know why, I just felt a compulsion to do so. While standing there, I fought back a lump in my throat the size of Fala...:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sherilocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Maybe I'll send my niece there
I just found out that she is demonstrating AGAINST the anti-war protesters in Poughkeepsie. If I thought it would do any good, I'd come up there and take her myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. Are there any MORE reasons to shun the Murkin Media?
Fear the Internet, CNN. Time to invade New Zealand!

:evilgrin:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kindigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. For fear of sounding like a naive newbie....
Edited on Thu Nov-18-04 08:51 AM by dragndust
I want to scream this to the rooftops. I've sent things to columnists in newspapers....people who based on their track record, would be the first to do an op-ed piece on it. All my pleas have been ignored.

Everyone from 18 to 80 are quietly discussing the fact we were robbed...from beauty shops to coffee shops.

Does anybody think it would be a good idea to send Letters to the Editor to every paper in the country? At the very least, by validating these people,it may give them some bravery? Given the right facts...glaring, and easy to understand...would the voices get louder, and harder to deny?

If I'm wrong, tell me so. If you agree, perhaps someone who writes for a living (or at least better than myself) could put it all in 250 words or less, and post it for all to use for that purpose.

Thank you for your consideration :)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Protect The Vote Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I may be a newbie as well
but I feel the same way you do.

I think a carpet bombing of letters to the editor and any other way we can get the media to take notice (and do their job) is in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. I would discourage the "form letter" concept...
and simply write whatever it is you feel off the top of your head. Form Letters have the propensity to greatly discredit the intent of the substance being discussed when it is found to have been a form letter. Good luck with your LTTE, if you speak from the heart, great words will pour onto the page...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myschkin Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
14. East coast states switched for Bush

Somebody noticed that the Eastcoast-States are overproportional on the left side? Any explanations for that? Somebody at Daily Kos wrote, when the Eastcoast was "turned around" and Bush had the lead, there was no necessarity to change the western votes.

They also wrote (some poll watchers), that at 5:00 pm almost nobody was voting anymore. So the exit polls of 4 pm have to be very accurate...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myschkin Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. Take a look

It's curios that there is such a difference between Eastern- and Western-States! :-o :-0

Maybe somebody makes a graphic to this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
17. 51 states?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but at last count I thought there were only 50. Call me kookie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. DC, is included since it'sworth 3 E.V.s as if it were a state. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Pretty sure D.C. is the 51st
I thought the same thing initially :) Hmmm... can't even get the number of states right no wonder the results are screwy :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
23. I disagree, this will discredit us and be dismissed.
The idea that Republicans did not answer pollster questions is simply not important. For example, suppose Right-wing emailers asked Republicans to fool the polls by not answering questions or by answering wrongly, then this would only show that their minions did a great job for their party.

Further this issue will tend to hide the discrepancy between paper enhanced evoting and paperless evoting in regard the respective accuracy of the exit polls, the polls being very accurate where paper could track votes, and being significantly inaccurate and being only toward Bush where paper was not used. Even worse, that one state out of several states skewed toward Bush, showed no change inciting the idea that the errors were indeed malicious.

When discussed on radio, the answer of Republicans not playing pollster-addicts will shut down this issue and the important issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myschkin Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. ...

The "Kerry"-States (better votes than Exit polls):

Montana
Oregon
Haiti
California
Tennessee
Texas
South Dakota
Kansas
North Dakota

Except of Tennesse all on the West-Side of US... Although the "Swing states" Nevada, Colorado and New Mexico are at least + 1.7 going for Bush... (Exit Polls/Votes)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myschkin Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. -

from Daily Kos:

"Don't you find it a little curious that the Exit Polls were wrong in the same direction in nearly every state, and the states that were the most wrong included ALL 3 of the most hotly contested states, and that the ones that were wrong in the opposite direction included the two that are most difficult to rig, and also were ALL western states, who closed their polls when it looked like Bush was in the clear?"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kindigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. What I was asking for in post 13....
Thank you for your replies. I didn't make it clear in my previous post that I was not asking for a "form letter". I was asking for someone who has been following this longer than I have, to give a compilation of the most convincing, glaring, facts and figures to support our position.

These items would be used as the basis of a LTTE. Some of us want to get involved, but don't have the expertise in stats etc. Although I have saved many posts/facts, and I understand them, I am having trouble selecting what is the most convincing to an average reader.

PS. I'm on a low budget...but plan to contribute to this site next month...so I can use the search feature, because... :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC