Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Did Clinton Swing Right?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
George_S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:20 PM
Original message
How Did Clinton Swing Right?
After hearing that Clinton advised Kerry to speak out against gay marriage and civil unions to gain more votes, I wondered what Clinton did to compromise liberalism during his presidency.

Any opinions? And are we paying for it now?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:21 PM
Original message
Welfare to Work, NAFTA ...
n/t

:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sr_pacifica Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. this would be my answer as well n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gays in the military.
Student's with marijuana convictions can't get financial aid.

Peltier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton did not advise Kerry to speak out against
civil unions. And Kerry himself came out against gay marriage, though he was against the constitutional amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. We lost congress...several senate seats
and about 800 democratic party state seats across the nation while Clinton was president. Yes we are paying for it now.

and imagine bill Clinton advising the Kennedys in the 60's or LBJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Signing the telecommunications act of 96(?)
Led to the continuing consolidation and increasing corporate control of the media - ironically, it was this self-same media that then bashed the crap out of him for a blowjob.


Unfortunately, he was not the only victim of this bad policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. That's the one that's really killing our party. (eom)
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Support gay marriage amendments
That is what it is reported Clinton said. Kerry should support the gay marriage amendments in all the swing states. That's what Kerry said he would never do, support discrimination in a constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You're right. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. when i read that
when i read that Kerry said he would never do that i just loved him even more and feel so proud to support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. I heard about that
and if it's true, Kerry has my admiration more, and he was right on to vote against DOMA then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. DOMA
as well as the Telecom Act

Communication Decency Act

et al.

while I recognise pragmatism in politics, the total abandonment of idealism ends up to be just a cynical exercise in winnig elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Our Democrats led the way in the move to police home PCs and
entertainment centers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clinton helped found the DLC. Gore and others left them.
Dean left them, Gore did, Obama said they put his name on without permission, Corzine, others are not part.

They went after Dean and Gore with a powerful vengeance. You do not cross them and act populist. They are corporately funded.

The Third Way is Clinton. Read it here. I don't like it either. It is like a nicer imperialism.

www.ndol.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Clinton called congressional Dean supporters, said he was unelectable.
Because of the civil unions bill in VT. Problem is, one he called was gay. He advised on these calls to support Clark, not Dean.

So maybe there are two sides to his mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Clinton got reelected mainly by...

...coopting the Right's agenda. Remember the '94 midterm elections? He told America, "I hear you." Then he went about implementing right wing reforms.

That's why it always cracks me up when I hear people describe Clinton as a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. And maybe Dick Morris was a freep mole (found this)
With the help of consultant Dick Morris and a bevy of polls and focus groups, Clinton succeeded in marketing himself as a centrist considerably to the right of his liberal friends and his liberal past. He ran on such conservative themes as deficit-cutting, targeted tax cuts, job growth, welfare reform, school uniforms, youth curfews, and more cops on the street. An English observer recently mused, "If you imagine a president committed to a balanced budget, welfare reform, and a stronger death penalty, would you say conservatism was losing?"

http://www.policyreview.org/jan97/engler.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. That is a LIE. Clinton was NOT talking about CIVIL UNIONS. Dammit!
Clinton urged Kerry to make it clear he opposed gay marriage--a proposal opposed by HUGE MAJORITIES OF THE AMERICAN ELECTORATE--by announcing he favored SOME of the amendment proposals banning gay marriage. Not ALL of them, because a couple of them lumped in bans against civil unions, too.

Efforts to conflate the two belie the kind of deceitfulness I would expect from the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Counsel Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. You Are Aware That Clinton Has ALWAYS Had Right-Leaning Tendencies, No...?
Clinton has always been, what I call, a "right-centrist." He's a centrist, but tends to lean right on many issues. Think "Joe Lieberman" and "John Breaux" if you want more shining examples...

People like Al Gore and myself, I'd consider "left-centrists": we're moderate Dems, but we have a populist liberal streak in us. We think like DLC-ers (and are often accused of being one of them), though we'd long since dismissed the DLC concept. I think we can probably put the likes of John Edwards in this group as well.

For years, having so many different KINDS of Dems was a good thing. Now I'm not so sure anymore, given that less of us are willing to hear a different point of view. Just my $0.02...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemPopulist Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Clinton at heart
Edited on Thu Nov-18-04 03:23 PM by DemPopulist
I think Clinton at heart is a left-centrist, like Gore and Edwards. I frankly think that he's been around so many wealthy people in the last ten years that his perspective has been distorted. I think he really enjoys hob-nobbing with the well-to-do. Maybe because his upbringing was more working-class than guys like Gore or even Edwards and he's somewhat self-conscious about it; people still make the double-wide jokes. Whatever the case, I think this has made him more sympathetic to corporate interests than he was initially. I think the "real" Clinton is something of a populist, as he was in his early political career and in the pre-Republican takeover years of '93-'94. But he moved right for political reasons and then gradually became too much a friend of the Denise Rich hoity-toity types. Again, he's lost perspective.

But no way would I put him in the same camp with the Joe Lieberman or John Breaux quasi-Republicans. He's a centrist-centrist, I would say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Counsel Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. I Want To Believe That... I Really Do...
...but the Big Dog's support for things like NAFTA and the GOP version of Welfare reform lead me to believe otherwise. "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" has a distinctive "right-wing" smell to it as well.

Note how I mentioned Lieberman and Breaux, and not Zell Miller and Ed Koch. Those guys may as well be Republicans. At least Lieberman and Breaux (and Evan Bayh, BTW) can at least be MISTAKEN for Democrats every once and again... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Counsel Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. I Want To Believe That... I Really Do...
...but the Big Dog's support for things like NAFTA and the GOP version of Welfare reform lead me to believe otherwise. "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" has a distinctive "right-wing" smell to it as well.

Note how I mentioned Lieberman and Breaux, and not Zell Miller and Ed Koch. Those guys may as well be Republicans. At least Lieberman and Breaux (and Evan Bayh, BTW) can at least be MISTAKEN for Democrats every once and again... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. he merely took his penis from the left side and moved it to his right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samtob Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Crude, tasteless yet
funny.
Man I question my sense of humor at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. He wanted to win...
Clinton wanted to win, and gave him honest and truthful advice on some of the best means of doing so. It has nothing to do with Right or Left, but strategy. You can not accomplish anything if you do not win and that has to be the most important thing. Kerry could have come out stronly against gay marrigae to win then moderate later on. Its a tried and true political tactic. It would have been just a supression tactic to keep evangelicals at home.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. Clinton treated the left the way Republicans used to treat fundamentalists
Edited on Fri Nov-19-04 02:34 PM by Cat Atomic
That is, offer them little symbolic things while reaming them in every way that really matters. NAFTA , Welfare Reform, the Telecommunications Act... Clinton took pro-corporate, anti-people positions repeatedly.

He's always been more of a socially liberal Republican, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. One of my friends said that Clinton's problem was that he wanted
the Republicans to like him more than he wanted to stand up for any principles.

That's why he backed down on gays in the military (he could have just issued an executive order and said that anyone who resisted it would be court-martialed for insubordination, which is what Truman did when he integrated the armed forces) and produced a muddled, easily attackable plan for health care. Instead of proposing a single-payer system, like almost every other industrialized nation in the world, he tried to appease the insurance companies with his managed care concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC