Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whitewash the 2004 Presidential Election Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 03:13 PM
Original message
Whitewash the 2004 Presidential Election Scandal
An Open Letter to the New York Times (and by implication) the Rest of the US Media Who are Trying to Whitewash the 2004 Presidential Election Scandal

by LILIAN FRIEDBERG
OpEdNews.com

Dear New York Times, etal,

As a long-time subscribed reader of your publication—one I have always staunchly defended one of the best in the world--I am incensed by your dismissive handling of what is one of the most significant breaking news stories since Watergate.(your Nov.12 article,Vote Fraud Theories, Spread by Blogs, Are Quickly Buried)

Here I am, seated at my computer, submerged in the nefarious bowels of the internet—reading a New York Times article with all the “twitchy cloak-and-dagger thrust” of booking an airline ticket, making a hotel reservation, a bank transfer or reading the Washington Post, Atlantic, New Yorker, ABC, NBC, and CBS headlines—things most of us do on a regular basis in the “parallel universe” that is the internet (citing another derogatory and patently absurd quip by NBC News’ Chip Reid).

http://www.opednews.com/friedberg_111504_media_whitewash.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rjnerd Donating Member (351 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. My standard quip on newfangled internet
Is to point out that Fedex is newer than the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Brain Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. GO LILIAN!
Oh, she is a doll! I LOVE this:

--------

Had you done your research, you’d have recognized the difference. Perhaps you got your internets confused: I see from today’s headlines that the “Pentagon Envisioning a Costly Internet for War”—Tim Weiner reports that “the Pentagon is building its own Internet, the military’s world wide web for the wars of the future. The goal is to give all American commanders and troops a moving picture of all foreign enemies and threats—a ‘God’s-eye view’ of battle.” Maybe that was the internets you had in mind—I’m quite content with the God’s eye-view I’m getting right here and now on this ol’ fashioned democratic internet.

The story is bigger than Watergate. Your dismissal of it is on a par with the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC