|
We (co-workers) received this letter recently from a friend serving in Mosul. This Iraqi city has recently featured prominently in news stories. Our buddy is no "far-left, liberal, blame America first, Saddam-loving....blah, blah, blah." Under normal circumstances, I would think that his decision to answer his country's call to arms would serve as adequate proof of that fact. In our currently hostile, suspicious, and divisive social climate (especially where the never-ending war is concerned), I am sure that some will claim that this letter is a fraud or simply doesn't reflect the truth. I assure you that it is real, current, and very illustrative of the growing crisis that our involvement in Iraq represents...especially from the perspective of our fighting men and women in the field. That said, I will admit that I did not include his name or address for reasons of privacy, respect, and more than a little fear that he would face some sort of consequence for his honest message.
Hello Everyone,
Thank you all for your concern and thoughts. I know you all are worried and do not enjoy hearing Mosul in the news. I don't like hearing it in the news either.
I can't hide it from you (wish I could) but since I can't, I can try and ease your worries. The city was in chaos for a few days (not now). All the police stations were abandoned (most without a fight) by the Iraqis. They then (and the city) came under insurgent control. Now this does not really pose a threat to the base I am on. However, we can not leave a whole city in insurgent control. Also, Mosul has other U.S. military bases within the city that were threatened.
Mosul is on the Tigris River and has five bridges into the city. If you control these bridges you essentially control the city. Forces were quickly sent out to control these bridges and a curfew was set for the city. After a couple of days of being controlled the city began to return to normal. Our unit sent out a small force to assist in securing one of these bridges. I was not a part of this force. As, many of you know I actually am the one at the radio in the operation center. I played a key role in monitoring the convoy movements and staying in touch with our personnel on the bridge.
It was an exciting and scary couple of days. The city was on the verge of becoming the next Falluja. However, the situation was handled quickly and decisively. Two days ago a U.S. force numbering around 1,200 began taking back the police stations. The insurgents instead of fighting destroyed three of the police stations and ran before U.S. troops arrived. This is typical of the fighting here.
Insurgents look for weaknesses in U.S. control and capitalize on them, then run when confronted. Mosul has been a very quiet city and everyone became relaxed and complacent. The insurgents in support of the fighting going on in Falluja and an attempt to divert U.S. troops from Falluja staged their own uprising in Mosul.
The fighters in Mosul are not fighters exiting Falluja as you may have heard. Also, the fighters are mostly Iraqi's and not Al Qadia or foreign Syrian fighters. This is in my opinion is a mistruth being promoted by certain people to confuse the American public into believing we are fighting a war on terror. It is true that a small percentage of the insurgents here may be Syrian fighters and an even smaller percentage may have some Al Qadia connection. But the truth is the vast majority of the insurgents (I estimate close to 90%) are Iraqi nationals trying to drive us out of their country.
Because of the insurgents being Iraqi it complicates things greatly. This is why most of the police stations were abandoned long before insurgents arrived. The police knew they were coming and many are sympathetic to their cause and many others are members of their cause. This is also why even on this base we kicked off all FPS troops (Iraqi troops on our base who provide security). Many were members of the insurgents and others sympathetic to them.
In addition to the troops I mentioned even the Iraqi National Guard who U.S. special forces troops have been training to take over the countries security were required to have a U.S. escort at all times. Many never even came to the base or reported for duty. We could just not afford to trust the Iraqi's even ones who we have trained to support us. This is a sad truth, but a telling one.
The reason I am explaining this is because what you hear is only partially true. The story is very different than the U.S. fighting terrorist. The Iraqi's are a passionate people who are willing to sacrifice the ultimate price for what they believe is their freedom. For good or bad the U.S. troops are an occupying force in a hostile nation.
The idea of free elections is a western concept being imposed on them. I do not believe they are even interested in elections. They are more concerned with western culture eroding their beliefs. Free elections are a step toward destroying what they believe and opening the door for western culture. This is why they are fighting so desperately. However, you will not hear that on the news, who in our minds could even think of opposing free elections.
It is true many Iraqi's do want elections but the majority is indifferent and will say whatever the person asking the questions wants to hear. This is their self preservation. Iraqi's supporting the U.S. are being murdered by the insurgents, so few Iraqi's openly support free elections. To do so puts their lives in danger.
Lastly and most importantly, Ramadan is now over. The holy month of Ramadan was a time for the insurgents to die for their cause. They believe that if they die during this holy time they will go to heaven and be surrounded by 70 virgins (if these virgins are anything like the girls I went to high school with they will have to beg and plead for months before even getting to second base, and 70 of them! That isn't my idea of heaven).
This month (16 October - 16 November) is the time of the most attacks, both this year and last. Because of this it is further proof that what they are fighting for is much greater than just stopping the elections. It shows they are fighting for religious reasons as well as maintaining power. The insurgent leaders are clerics (mostly Sunni, minority group who was in power under Saddam), who wish to remain in power. Because the insurgent leaders are holy men and we experience more attacks than any other time during the holy month, I believe their fight is much more than disrupting elections. Now that Ramadan is over things are expected to return to normal.
I wanted to comfort you but instead I went into one of my rants. Since I have time to write such rants you can tell I am still at my boring desk job in a very secure hardened building (by hardened I mean it is concrete with 2 foot thick walls. A mortar cannot penetrate the building. I will keep you informed and probably tell you a lot more than what you want to hear. Miss you all. Can't wait to be home.
|