Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Democrats held the Congress for 40 something years and I'm...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 11:41 PM
Original message
"The Democrats held the Congress for 40 something years and I'm...
...still poor, my family hasn't had insurance and the good jobs keep disapearing. So I'm supposed to think it's different this time?"

Uttered by a drunk guy at the local bar. Yes, he was blitzed, but what is the answer?

The Great Society (generally speaking) drove the Poverty rate down from the 20% or so rate to the "managable" 10-15% of today. That's "progress" I suppose.

If you're him though, in that range, why vote?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. The answer is that a Republican congress, as we have now, would
be worse for working people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. When Johnson began the Great Society the poverty rate was a...
...little higher than 20%, it was 22% back in 1960. When Johnson left office in 1969 the poverty rate had fallen to 13%.

<snip>
When President Johnson came to office 22 percent of the nation's families lived in poverty (down from 30 percent in 1950). The nation's largest programs to assist the poor--Aid to Families with Dependent Children, Social Security, and Food Stamps--provided meager benefits to only a small proportion of the country's impoverished population. AFDC paid just $388 a month (in 1980 dollars) to a family of four; Social Security payments averaged just $184 a month (in 1980 dollars); and food stamps reached just two percent of the nation's poor. Medicare and medicaid did not exist. Thirty-three million poor people competed for just 600,000 public housing units.

When Johnson left office, the official poverty rate had fallen from 22 percent in 1960 to 13 percent - which is where the poverty rate remains today. AFDC payments had risen to $577 (in 1980 dollars). Infant mortality among the poor, which had barely declined between 1950 and 1965, fell by one-third in the decade after 1965 as a result of the expansion of federal medical and nutritional programs. Before the implementation of Medicaid and Medicare, 20 percent of the poor had never been examined by a physician; when Johnson retired as president the figure had been cut to 8 percent. The proportion of families living in substandard housing--that is, housing lacking indoor plumbing - also declined steeply, from 20 percent in 1960 to 11 percent a decade later.

<link> http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/historyonline/con_poverty.cfm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. What 40 years does he speak of?
Is he talking about the USA? I guess he is missing some timeline then or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. If he's not bright enough to understand why he should vote
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 11:58 PM by bowens43
then nothing you say to him is going to make a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
missouri dem Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. He's right. The Democratic party has stoped speaking for the
working class. The last election was all about the undecided voter. We should have a message of Progressive Populism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Do We Have To Become as Bigoted as the Original Populists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desperadoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. The simple answer is
he's a drunk and that has more to do with his problems than the Great Society or the Democrats in Congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. At the local bar? Ya think that might be his problem and not who
is in office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC