Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In the movie PATTON there is a scene in which Patton played by

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CoffeeAnnan Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 02:52 PM
Original message
In the movie PATTON there is a scene in which Patton played by
George C.Scott is asked to host a party for a Russian General( I believe it was Chuikov, the hero of Stalingrad) after the end of all hostilities.When Chuikov offers his good wishes and extends his hands in friendship Patton arrogantly turns him down saying he wouldn't shake hands with a Commie Bastard.That incident and what has happened since the end of 1945 clearly says to me that the U.S. took an unnecssarily antagonistic attitude towards a country that saw 25 million of its people killed in the fight against Nazi tyranny.That antagonsim led to many wars and the militarization of this country that has warped all our thinking.I was hoping that we will take the path of conciliation as befits a superpower and become a force for peaceful resolution of disputes and a force for the betterment of all human beings on this planet.That, of course, is turning out to be a mirage.The twenty first century is likely to be even more bloody than the twentieth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
St. Jarvitude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Two words
Line breaks.

Spacing after sentences end might help, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeAnnan Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sorry.Will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Thanks for adding.
Very much appreciate the analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. That was constructive criticism
Not only did it refrain from personally insulting the threadstarter, it contained good suggestions as to how to improve the clarity and readability of his posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. The attitude is only the tip of the iceberg.
What is catastrophic is our failure to factor in Soviet (and now Russian) paranoia after the whole Napolean and Hitler experience. Not wise. This is why Putan is threatening to deploy a new gen of ballistic missiles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Patton had some major screws loose.
I thought it may have been Zhukov whose hand Patton refused to shake (I may be wrong)? Patton wasn't much in favor of Nazi's either, he got along well with some former SS after the war. The Russians had plenty of blood on their own hands maybe more than the Nazi's good for Patton.

Today at least the Neo Fascist regimes in the Northern Hemisphere are not openly killing their own people at home (yet).

If W were to offer a handshake to me I would also reject it. To hell with conciliation or the insincere reconciliation. Lieberman in a Bush cabinet will just be salt in the wounds. The so conciliation by Reid and Leahy will not sit well with the Democratic base.

Life is ugly now and will get uglier lets face it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes, life is ugly now and will get uglier!
It had to be said, and thanks for saying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Has anyone here ever read Harrison Salisbury's
Siege of Stalingrad (or maybe Leningrad?) That is one powerful book. I read it about 35 years ago and think I will go to the library and read it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeAnnan Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I have not read it but Harrison Salisbury was one of the all time great
correspondents.Like William Shirer he was a student of history and when he was on the scene he did not just recite well worn truisms handed down by the powerful.His inquisitive mind was always on display in every deptach he sent home.

I will plan to read it along with a couple of other suggestions in this thread.Good time to read too as the kids will be busy doing their thing for the Thanksgiving holidays giving the old man a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Menshevik Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. It was "900 Days: The Siege of Leningrad"
EXCELLENT book! I read it while I was studying in St. Petersburg. I was amazed at how people could live through the siege...the hunger, the freezing cold, the artillery bombardments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeAnnan Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thanks.Will order it today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Thanks for the full title. As I said it was at least 35 years ago if
not more. I do tend to get my "grads" mixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stargleamer Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Actually, I kind of remember it differently...
Edited on Sun Nov-21-04 03:29 PM by Stargleamer
Whether from the movie or a biography of Patton, I read or heard something as follows:

Patton (to translator): tell that guy he's an S.O.B.
Russian officer (to translator): tell Patton he's a (Russian Equivalent to an S.O.B.)
Patton (to translator): tell him,"Well, as one S.O.B. to another, let's have a drink!".

I don't know if this is correct, it's been such a long time since I saw the movie or read Patton's biography.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeAnnan Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. You may be right.I will look it up.Shirer also refers to it in his book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just something ancedotal.
My husband worked in the past with a man named Hans, a German who had survived Stalingrad. He said more Germans died from the cold than anything else and that the surviving Germans stacked up the frozen bodies of the dead to make shelter from the elements and artillery I would assume.

I can't verify this anywhere, but I just thought it was an interesting footnote in Nazi/Soviet history from an eyewitness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeAnnan Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Very interesting. In the work BARBAROSSA, Alan Clark talks about the
cold weather as a factor not just at Stalingrad but also in the battle of Moscow.Like Napoleon before him, Hitler overlooked this factor, with disastrous consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Of the 295,000 Germans surrounded at Stalingrad,
95,000 finally surrendered. Some specialists and wounded were airlifted out, perhaps 1,000.

Of the 95,000 who surrendered, 5,000 were eventually released by the Soviets, most around 1955.

The other 90,000 died in Soviet captivity.

One of the stupidest decisions ever by a leader not allowing the Sixth Army to retreat while it was being surrounded.

Also, much blame goes onto Paulus. When Manstein's relief effort was stopped about 20 miles from the pocket, Paulus had to breakout to meet it.

He claimed he had no orders, was short of fuel, would not be able to keep the army together. Still, Manstein told him the relief force would soon have to retreat and could certainly advance no further. It was Paulus' last chance to save 295,000 men and he wouldn't act.

Probably most of the equipment would have been lost and maybe only a third or half of the army would have gotten through, but how could you not attempt your last chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. It didn't matter, Stalin was certifiably nuts
I don't think we could have really come to peaceful terms with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. That was a scene from a film
It never happened. Zhukov never met Patton at Torgau or anywhere else on the Elbe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. You're right about the outlook for Century 21.
If you're interested in the "Why" things ended up like they have, you might enjoy a decent book on the subject:

"The Secret History of the CIA" by Joseph Trento. The book's not perfect, but it does give you interviews with enough of the players involved to get a true picture of how the Superpowers' ruling elites use war to maintain power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC