A wonderful site:
http://community-2.webtv.net/essentialhealth/BIOTECHNOLOGY/A few excerpts:
"Over 70% of all processed supermarket foods contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Biotech companies have changed our food supply over the last 7 years basically without our permission."
"They can splice fish genes into a strawberry or human genes into corn. Genetic engineering produces highly unstable living organisms that have the ability to reproduce and mutate and cross with other species. What this means is that five generations down the line, a GMO may have characteristics very different than the parent GMO."
"Unlike past technologies, biotechnology produces living organisms, which, by definition, reproduce and evolve, guaranteeing eventual unpredictable & unintended consequences. Unlike an oil spill, genetic pollution may never be able to be cleaned up. Scientists around the world agree that GMOs are imprecise, unstable, and unpredictable."
"Another problem is that every time a GMO is produced, new proteins, or potential allergens are also produced. GMOs frequently contain allergens, for example those allergic to fish may go into anaphylactic shock when fish genes are placed in potato products. oops…"
"In May, 2000, Professor Hans-Hinrich Katz, a leading German zoologist, released research that shows that genes used to modify crops can jump to other species and cause bacteria to mutate. Katz found that the gene used to modify oilseed !$%* had transferred to bacteria living in the guts of honey bees."
"Salmon fish farms are employing "trojan genes," or genes that make a species grow to full size four to six times as quickly as wild varieties. The problem is that during storms, farmed salmon inevitably escape into the wild. Due to their gargantuan size, when these GM fish escape into the wild, they have a mating advantage over non-GM fish. However, due to their genetic tweaking, their offspring are far less likely to live to reproductive age. Through this process, the entire species is wiped out in about 40 generations. This has the potential to cause irreparable damage to fish populations, forever. "
"Consumers in Europe, Japan, and China have told their leaders they don't want GMOs. These countries have strict labeling laws and many have moratoriums on GMOs. Famine stricken Zambia and Zimbabwe are refusing GMO food-aid. Most other governments have required mandatory labeling of GMOs and have only allowed a few GM products to be released after rigorous safety testing."
"Meanwhile, in the U.S. while over 85% of U.S. consumers polled want labeling of GMO products, our government refuses to require labeling or long term testing and considers GMOs "substantially equivalent" to conventional food. However, they do consider GMOs unique enough to grant utility patents to biotech corporations and universities."
"While polls consistently show that over 80% of Americans want GMO products to be labeled, the FDA does not require labeling of genetically modified foods. This is based on the landmark decision by the Bush administration in 1992 that GM products are "substantially equivalent" to non-GM products despite the fact that genetic engineering often changes the nutritional and allergenic properties of a product. This decision is not based in science and runs counter to Europe, Japan, China, and many leaders of the scientific community."
To put this in perspective, the FDA maintains strict labeling laws for other food modifications. For example, juice must be labeled if it is from concentrate, milk cartons must indicate if they contain skim milk, rice packages must indicate if they have been vitamin enriched."
"Why, then does the FDA not require labeling for genetically engineered food? The Guardian reports that the Bush administration's ties to Monsanto are even greater than the Clinton Administration's. "The secretaries of defense, health and agriculture, the attorney general and the chairman of the House agriculture committee all have links with the firm
or the wider industry."
"However, most GMOs are not being designed to increase nutrition or yield, which would indicate that the seed companies are trying to help world hunger. Rather, most GMOs have a yield lag of 5-10% and many GMOs have reduced nutritional content. Contrary to bio-tech PR, studies consistently show that GMOs yield less than conventional crops. Most GMOs are actually designed to benefit the seed companies. In reality, the majority of the large seed companies that produce GMOs are the same chemical companies that produce the majority of the world's pesticides and herbicides. Many GMOs are designed to be herbicide resistant plants that help the seed/chemical companies sell greater quantities of herbicides"
"Because GMOs are owned by corporations, farmers who grow GMO crops are forbidden to save seed, so that seed companies can make money year after year. Purchasing seed every year is not a viable financial option for the several billion farmers who get seeds for free by saving their own from the previous year's harvest. "