Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Smacked down a friend yesterday.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:20 AM
Original message
Smacked down a friend yesterday.
She got her "Dear Ready Reserve, we need to update your information in the event of a national crisis" paper this weekend. I had told her to expect it (and why) a few weeks before the election, and been given the "oh, that's not going to happen to me" speech because she's been out of the service for thirteen years, and has two babies (2 yrs old and 8 months).

I had warned both she and her husband that this was coming, and been pretty much blown off. That annoyed me, because why would I make this shit up? Do I not have ENOUGH to worry about in the rest of my life that this type of thing is something I'm going to create and spread FOR THE FUN OF IT?

Anyway, she voted third party (its Michigan), and he won't say (but voted Shrub in 2000). She was very surprised to have received that letter. I told her I intended to laugh at her if she got called up, and laugh even harder when her husband got drafted under the 'special skills' provision (he's a computer guy). I wasn't being nasty or anything; just very matter-of-fact.

"But who will take care of our children?" she asked. I shrugged, and said I was sure they would find somebody; my husband and I would be happy to take the kids if we weren't drafted, too. (That special skills provision pretty much makes everyone draftable, including janitorial workers.) She couldn't believe it when I said I would be laughing -- "You'd LAUGH?" she asked again in a very horrified way.

Yes, I told her. If you didn't help prevent it, you deserve it.

I've gotten cold, haven't I? Sigh. Back to work....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's okay Ida, you done fine.
Tell your friend that maybe Newt Gingrinch will have his orphanages up and running by the time she and her hub get drafted. They can take care of her kids.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. Bwahahahaha!!!!
I like that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Christian Donating Member (746 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Your compassion stuns me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
60. Oh please.
I'm done bleeding for those idiots who voted for chimpy. They need to see the consequences of their actions, and if mothers and fathers are shipped off to Iraq, that's fine by me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #60
72. My friend - you are correct.
The cons are most happy to have venom spat at every one of us. They chose the idiot - now they can pay for it. All that happened is that a liberal acted like a conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. What do you mean by 'including janitorial workers'? They are
Edited on Tue Nov-23-04 09:24 AM by ArkDem
people with a job just like anyone else aren't they? We aren't being elitist are we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Ida was referring to the "special skills" notation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. "Special Skills" used to be physicians, nurses and pharmacists.
When "special skills" expands to "scrubbing out toilets" I'm not sure if "elitist" is the word you are really looking for -- I'm thinking its more in the "we can take anyone we damn well want to up to age 54 under this rule, and we're going to make sure we do that."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. how old actually can they take them?
my friend's cousin, age 55, is being called up and yesterday on one of the boards, someone mentioned a 60 yr old .

i'd like to hear how many senior citizens are being activated.

my freeper husband is 65 and he doesn't believe all of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. I'm not sure what the limit is on folks who have served already.
The "special service" thing on the draft plan that started circulating last year said 18-54 if I remember it correctly. Anyone else know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. 18-35 is what is on the SSS site
Edited on Tue Nov-23-04 10:09 AM by Walt Starr
Not 54.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. That is under the current system, not the "new" plan.
The one that is still "under wraps" but got released under the Freedom of Information Act. This article http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/164693_draft13.html says 44, but I'm pretty sure I read 54 somewhere....

I wish the search function was working again! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. The 'New Plan' would still have to be approved by congress, IIRC
Edited on Tue Nov-23-04 10:45 AM by Walt Starr
:shrug:

It means the difference between whther or not I am draftable. IF drafted, I will choose prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ducks In A Row Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
57. people older than 35 ARE being called up right now.
so it looks like we're all fair game at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. Only prior service people
Not an actual draft. They are calling up people who have previously served only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southpaw Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Someone posted yesterday
About a 60-year-old getting called up. You might want to do a search.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Come On! Are You Really Having That Much...
trouble understanding the crux of that statement? Or are you just trying to start a fight or be sarcastic?

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Sarcasm is missed by a lot of people. Unfortunately, there is no cure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Sarcasm is almost impossible to detect in written form.
That post didn't look sarcastic to me, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
55. It was, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. I use sarcasm as an IQ test
Fast, efficient, effective, and non-invasive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. An IQ test using sarcasm would screen out a lot of RW nutjobs --
for the most part, it's beyond the capacities of all I've ever met.

Do you have particular questions outlined for this test or does the sarcasm pop up during conversation? Is it a written test or do you record the reaction of the subject during conversation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. Conversation
and I look into their eyes for any sign of recognition of sarcasm or even just a simple sense of humor.

Works like a charm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #40
54. I Know The Question Wasn't Directed To Me.
But, in my experience, when someone says "your a sarcastic son-of-a bitch" that's usually a pretty good sign that they get it.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #54
63. Maybe "don't appreciate sarcasm" is a better phrase to consider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Cold? Maybe.
But justified, IMHO, given the political climate created by Mepublicans. Most * lovers think that supporting the troops means putting a magnet on your car. If they agree with an aggressive take-the-war-to-the-terrorists approach, they need to realize that it means committing a lot of troops to the conflict. Maybe more than have volunteered for active duty.

Time for some "tough love." Maybe next time they'll think about voting for the guy who says he can fight terrorists a better way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
48. it's these parent's duty to protect their children, which they
have failed to do. There is no reason to trust this admin, after WMD, yellowcake, plamegate, etc, yet they did anyway. The draft may be the main motivation behind the stolen election anyway.

It was really magnanimous to offer to take care of the kids, that's about as compassionate as you can get. Children can't afford for their parents to be this stupid, so they may may have to pay for it in the worst way possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ida, showing sympathy does no good.
This is all about tough love. And frankly, when the draft affects my family, I will become less kinder in my criticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigMcLargehuge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. it's winter... we're all getting colder
my brother in law was lamenting a surge in his property taxes this year, he voted for Bush because he wanted an income tax cut, that amounted to, maybe, 60 bucks in his tax bracket. He said, "what am I going to do?" I said "Pay it or sell your house." I explained, again, how a 60 dollar tax cut can very easily equal a 2000 dollar tax increase, same as I did before the election.

But it went over his head, again, but it may have passed a little closer to his hairline this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edgewater_Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. It IS What She Voted For, After All
And we do get the goverment we deserve ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitSileya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. You know what?
With the immense effort you've been putting in to save the country, I think you have earned the right to not expend an iota of energy sympathizing with those who've willfully ignored, or even contributed to, the predicament on their doorstep.

Keep up the good work, and if you can get a laugh out of those fools, I say take it, there's scant litttle else to alugh at these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I couldn't agree more. I spent 4 years working so hard to defeat bush and
his crime cabal... I no longer have patience or kindness for the mindless fucks who voted for them. To me, they're ALL gop nazis, every single one.

UHMURRIKKKA under a bush...

Heil bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. I understand--your laughing is of the bitter, not the happy, kind, Ida.
The despairing kind, as in when you tried to warn someone of the consequences of their ignorance, and they blithely continued to ignore the situation. She has children? And she doesn't know what the implications of being Ready Reserve were? How totally tragically fucking irresponsible of both her and her husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. She didn't know she was still considered "Ready Reserve."
It had been thirteen years, and she was discharged honorably, etc. She explained to me (very patiently) why I didn't know what I was talking about when I warned she and her husband about it initially.

And you are totally right about the type of laughter. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. Do you know anything else about this Ida?
I've been out 9 years and I am NOT in the IRR (I verified this a few years ago). Anyone who was enlisted and not retired, should not be in the IRR after 13 years! I don't blame you for laughing. I did vote for the right guy, and if I get a letter like that not only will I be laughing hysterically, but raising all kinds of hell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. Here's an excerpt from the e-mail I sent them Oct 20th
"Colonel David Hackworth is the MOST decorated soldier from Vietnam. You can read his biography here: http://www.hackworth.com/biography.html (with my point being this guy does NOT play games with ANYONE -- he is on the "confidential tell all" list with EVERYONE in the upper brass in the service).

His website has the following information posted:

PATRIOT NEEDED -- TO PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE PENTAGON'S PLAN TO INCREASE THE PERIOD OF TIME THAT RESERVISTS CAN BE ORDERED ONTO ACTIVE DUTY
SFTT has learned of this plan from an unimpeachable & vetted source, but desires to obtain more details about this new variation of the "backdoor draft." The plan is largely complete, and is set to be announced after the election. Please reply to here. All responses will be handled with max attention to maintaining confidentiality for source(s).


http://www.hackworth.com /

I am sending you this because one of the "rumors" that is flying around is that they are planning on calling back people who have not been active duty in the last TEN TO FIFTEEN YEARS. Things that will NOT be taken into account include children or "mild" health concerns; your wife was trained to deal with PTS and (if this is a happening thing) they are going to want her!!! (The Individual Ready Reserve folk include 60 something year old people with heart problems and cancer, and they are still being called up -- granted, these people have medical skills which are in high demand at the moment, but..."
<snip>

There were some posts about it on DU around that time period...sorry, I wish I knew more.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. Thanks Ida
I was in a high demand MOS of course. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #31
62. I'm wondering too
Edited on Tue Nov-23-04 01:24 PM by FlaGranny
"There are two ways to serve in the US Army: either serve full-time in Active Duty as an Enlisted Soldier or Officer, or serve part-time as an Enlisted Soldier or Officer in the Army Reserve. All Soldiers have a statutory eight-year military service obligation (MSO), which is established at the time of entry into military service (Active or Reserve). Traditional enlistment terms are three, four, five and six years. Terms of service for active duty are from 2-6 years." http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/army/usar-irr.htm

The obligation is supposedly 8 years. I wonder if that has been changed in the past 30 or so years.

I just got out my husband's papers. He was inducted in 1964 and served 2 years active duty, then he served in the reserves until 1969, when he received his honorable discharge. That is only FIVE years. Does this mean, even though he has been discharged, he is still considered to "owe" 3 more years? He is 65 now, but he served as a medic in the Army. I wonder if he is safe.

Edit: After more research, another site I found states that upon discharge the military service obligation is over. I guess prior to the 1980's the contract was shorter. But I guess anything could be changed with a new law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. I think you're absolutely right.
Edited on Tue Nov-23-04 09:43 AM by Crunchy Frog
Other people here have referred to it as a kind of "tough love". People in this country need to learn to accept the consequences for the choices that they make. Actually, their is a school of thought in child rearing that bases itself on that premise. It's referred to as the "Love and Logic" system. It avoids punishing the child and simply lets the real life consequences of the childs own choices do the teaching.

The so called "party of personal responsibility" needs to start accepting some of it. I think that it should be pointed out to people whenever possible, when they are suffering from something that they themselves voted for.

I would have laughed in their face too. After all, the rest of us also have to suffer from the choices that these people made.

I've gotten pretty damned cold about the whole thing too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaLynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
16. I totally understand ...
You're expending a lot of energy in other directions. You tried to tell them. What can you do now for them?

I'm in a similar situation with a friend of mine. Her husband has been in the Reserves for years. He's almost 50. I tried to tell them that he'd probably end up getting called up and sent overseas, but they just scoffed and said they weren't sending 50 year olds, even when I showed them that they were. Well, they went ahead and voted for * and, surprise, surprise, he's getting called up. At first, he thought he wouldn't pass the medical, but he did. Then, he thought he could get to stay in the country working "homeland security" -- like that even happens. But, nope -- He's going to Afghanistan.

And I just can't feel that sorry for him. I just can't. He voted for *. He supports the war. Well, then why the heck shouldn't he go?

I know ... maybe I'm getting cold, too. We can both be ice cubes together. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. Time to print & carry those handy dandy enlistment forms for chicken hawks
who aren't in the reserves.


http://www.dior.whs.mil/forms/DD0004.pdf

Tell 'em you'll drop them off at the recruiters yourself, to save them the trouble ;)

Zero tolerance for dimbulbs too lazy to read some real news and put 2 and 2 together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
22. Doesn't she watch the news?
When we first invaded Iraq, I saw several stories on the news about women who were expected to report to duty - one just 6 weeks after delivering a child. Some of the women were married, so their husbands were still at home with the kids, but there was one couple who were both in the Army and were both expected to go. They had no living relatives to help them. They MAY have managed to get a deferment for her, but it was a pretty extreme case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
25. Good for you, Ida
Time for "tough love." Like Molly Ivins says, they have to be made to understand what their vote really means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
26. Why would you enable the enablers?
Why offer to take care of their children? YOU warned them. They made their bed now let them lie in it. Let them find someone else to take care of their children. It's THEIR problem now. Don't make their life easy.

You're not cold. I am. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #26
43. I agree
Yes, it's cold. But Ida should have said that she was sure one of the local churches would take care of them. After all, those pseudo-Christians are so very concerned about children, right? Oh, except these are outside the womb...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VivaKerry Donating Member (609 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
27. Jesus is going to take care of her children.
Just put the kids on a bus to a red state, and all will be well. After all, she put all of her support behind the red-staters. They will help her.

I am cold too.

this is just one example of exactly HOW this country will come into reality based thinking... each person will have to lose their immunity to the heinous bush policies and wars.
This past election proved to me that SUFFERING, HARDSHIP will be the only thing that will swing this country back to sanity. And so be it. Every bush supporter - direectly or indirectly -- who suffers will be one peg of hope for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quill Pen Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
67. I am sure you're right...
The Red Staters are the ones concerned about saving every prethuth fetuth. I have no doubt that their high regard for the value of human life includes caring for the children of active-duty military personnel.

What?!? Really? Shocking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
28. Serves them right I can't wait for all the Rethugs to get called up
I feel bad for us. But the laugh I get from them getting called up will help me through my depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
29. this is what i ran up against alot. i dont lie
i was staying informed while the people i talked to said they didnt watch news didnt want to know what was up in the world. i would tell them something and they would say, oh no that isnt happening. how the hell do you know, you just told me you dont pay attention. why in the world would i give you the wrong information. all i know and share, does it really sound like i am making it up as i go

so i too am going to laugh at the people i have told and dismissed what i gave. i too am "cold". they earned it, they voted it

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
32. Sounds like my freeper dad
He wouldn't vote for Kerry 'cause he's afraid that "those Dummycrats will take away my guns!" (I can't remember the last time he's been to the firing range.) Then in the next breath, "I can't believe how much my health care premiums have gone up. It was zero about 3 years ago. (He forgot what happened then, hint! ;) ) Now it's almost $300. I don't know what happened?"

I didn't tell him, but you posters know.

My favorite freeper line (a real quote): "I'm gonna homeschool my kids 'cause I don't want him corrupted by those liberal teachers! ...I'm sure glad that I got the 2nd interview, my unemployment runs out in about a month."

Freepers! :dunce: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyLoochka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
34. I support the "cold" approach
wholeheartedly. Bush voters need to have the dots connected between their votes and what is happening to them in their own lives as the fascism kicks into high gear, since they are obviously not able to connect them by themselves.

And they need to seek help from fellow Bush* enablers, not from those who tried to stop them from jumping off the right wing cliff with him, thereby dragging all the rest of us along. All they should get from the 55+ million of us is, "Too bad, reap what you have sown. I will give help, where I can, to those who took a stand with their votes against this fascist regime and are suffering because of your dim-wittedness. You are getting what you asked for, so stew in it!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. It's gonna be a long, cold winter
The Rethugs better get ready for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
35. Shit, you were nice about it. I would have been downright nasty
Edited on Tue Nov-23-04 10:17 AM by Walt Starr
You know, look at the letter with a note of concern on my countenance followed by a raucus:

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

YOU FUCKING MORONIC DIPSHIT FUCKWAD, YOU VOTED FOR THIS SHIT AND NOW YOU HAVE TO WALLOW IN YOUR OWN SHIT THAT YOU VOTED FOR!!!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!


You know, something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
36. doesn't the GOP have a list of their contributors?


time for another call for contributions: this time for a little of 'your time' .... in the Middle East. time for the party faithful to show what they're made of.

a nice flyer in the mail to these folks ought to do it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
39. "Actions Have Consequences" - Repeat As Often As Necessary
Ida, I understand, and I agree. Apathy exacts a price. So do ignorance and hate.

Your friends are now learning that their actions had consequences. Sounds like an efficient way of teaching them "personal responsibility".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
44. If the Draft letter was a turd, I'd rub their faces in it.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
46. no-one "deserves" it, but some people only have themselves to blame
-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigone382 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
47. Stupid Hurts
Their kind of stupid should REALLY be painful. It's time to reap what they sowed, and the karma of expecting "others" to sacrifice for their casual choices has returned to them.

Families are forever changed by war. On both sides. * and Condi and Donald act as if it's all some nebulous idea, some virtual game. Here's a dose of reality for some stubborn, stupid people.


Rub it in, Ida. And then rub it in. And rub it in a little more.

Stupid should be painful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
49. Coldness is understandable now.
I feel it too.

I know, however, that we have to be prepared to forgive our brothers and sisters who failed to PAY ATTENTION and enabled this COUP. We're going to need to work together to rebuild the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
51. I agree with you
and if that's cold, then so be it. I feel the same way. If this is what sheeple wanted ... more Bushista policy ... then tough.

I love that "it won't happen to me" notion. That's real repuke of her, as long as shes OK, screw everyone else. Well, the chickens have come home to roost! Ha, ha.

I have no sympathy. In fact, I hope more and more that people like your friend(s) get just what they voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
52. ""But who will take care of our children?"
How about Jesus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
53. Tell her to send the kids to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC
I'm sure they'll be ok there.

/madness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
56. Cold? Nah. "Let them eat.....
...republican values"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callous taoboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
59. Ka-BLOOOEY!
Good on you. When the first suitcase nuke goes off in an urban center
I plan to poke my head into the office of a colleague and say, "So. National security, eh?" Of course, I DO NOT want this to ever occur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
61. The REDS will get what they asked for and they'll get no sympathy from me
If you are not AGAINST Bush, you are WITH him, and complicit. When the REDS get drafted, their kids get drafted, they lose their health insurance and their social security and medicare, when the environment is trashed beyond repair and we are in WWWIII against the entire Muslim world, they better remember that this is what happens when you hand a MAN DATE to a snivelling psychopathic LIAR despite the MANY, MANY warnings we gave, the protests, the books, the articles. Don't come CRYING to me.

Well done Ida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
64. Hey at least you made yourself feel good...
...if this person was a friend they certainly deserve better than that.

What is this need to slam people the were once considered friends? Everyday someone comes on here telling a story how they ripped a relative/friend. Most of the time what was said crosses a line that intentionally hurts the intended and the howler monkeys here cheer the stories on. It's like a cult, isolation and reinforcement of the group belief.

Surely we are better than that.

Sorry if much of this seems directed at you personally, I am just frustrated with DU right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. I'm thinking its because we are sick of being the "nice" ones.
You know, the ones who are ignorable because we're "nice" and try to warn people about dangerous situations, like climate change and stuff. We have to worry about "credibility" while repukes can make insane charges against Clinton with ZERO evidence, and known liars are treated with more respect than Novel laureates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. I understand that....
But I still think a calm reasoned word has a much more lasting impact for the positive than anything in a gotcha mode. It feels good temporarily but in the end we alienate those we claim to fight for.

Again, I'm sorry this came up in your thread. You don't deserve any singling out by me. I've just reached my breaking point.

I was talking with a guy in the bar the other day about the election and what was wrong. And someone who wasn't even near the conversation simply shouts out that anyone who voted for Bush is retarded. Now it may have felt good to that person but most of the bar reacted with "geez what an asshole". Not because of the message but the messenger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasbobbo Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #66
74. i tend to agree with you r
friends, family & neighbors deserve some empathy. i would be inclined toward letting these people figure it out themselves. the kids certainly didn't do anything that would warrant a trip to the orphanage. sometimes the less strident you are the wiser you appear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. nope, we're not better than that
Edited on Tue Nov-23-04 02:59 PM by Carolina
we're pissed and we're not gonna take it anymore. We worked, fought and even prayed to end this regime. We were up against apathy, ignorance and greed. Now the chickens have come home to roost and hell, yeah, we feel damn good when Reds "benefit" from their votes.

DU is our refuge and if these kinds of threads bother you, then ignore 'em. Frankly, though, they are a much needed tonic for me.

Signed: Sophia Patrillo, the crusty old lady I aspire to be!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
69. I didn't get to smack down mine.

Around the 1st of October he received notice he was being reactivated November 2nd (election day!) after 9 years out. It has been delayed while they re-run his security clearance which left him plenty of time to get to the polls this last election. For some reason he decided to vote Democratic after having voted straight Republican his entire previous life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quill Pen Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
70. Military personnel with children
I think that's about as generous an offer as one could ever make, to take care of another couple's kids while they were in the military.

I don't think anyone deserves to be drafted, (I hate this war as much as anyone else here) and after being off active duty for 13 years, I can see where they would have figured it was all right to start their family. Their oldest child is older than the war, after all.

But I would not want to see military personnel get exemptions from service just for choosing to have kids. The idea that childless soldiers are somehow more expendable is repellent to me. I don't think parenthood should put one in a protected class.

It would be tragic if something happened to those parents, and I'd weep for their kids along with all the other kids I've wept for this past year and a half, both Iraqi and American, civilian and military. But this is the job they signed up for, and they cannot pretend that they don't understand the sacrifices it entails, not at this point. And, as you say, at least one of them voted to "stay the course" of this unconscionable act of aggression. Feeding our brave and able-bodied into this horrific meat grinder is all part of "staying the course."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
71. See this thread: PET Scans Show Revenge Can Be Satisfying....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
73. Ummm...
Is everybody forgetting that Kerry was pro-Iraq war, and that he said he'd send more troops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC