Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Championing Individual Conscience"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 01:17 PM
Original message
"Championing Individual Conscience"?
"Congress was rushing last week to wrap matters up for the year, but it found time to enact the Physicians and Hospitals Harassment and Endangerment Act. Of course, it went by a different name: the federal budget bill.

The legislation's main order of business was to shape $388 billion in spending for the coming year and, in the course, to begin paring down social programs, whose eventual reduction has been the point all along, in addition to making the rich richer, of President Bush's tax cuts. The resulting, unsustainable deficits are meant to force an economizing splurge that, since the military naturally must be spared, will be taken out on domestic spending.

This is the radical right's old defunding-the-government dream by another means.

The early victims are student loans, environmental protection and public education, among others, although Congress easily found the odd millions here and there for hometown pork projects in the districts of favored members.

The budget bill became, as well, an early vehicle for carrying the recent election into legislative action, as Christian conservatives, essential these days for Republican victories, start pocketing their policy spoils. Thus the provision that will prevent any level of government -- local, state, federal -- from requiring hospitals, physicians or other health-care providers to perform abortions or to make abortion referrals.

This was pitched as championing individual conscience, but the real agenda is to set up doctors and hospitals to be harried or threatened into shutting down a key part of women's health services.

Most vulnerable at first will be the Medicaid programs in a few states that fund abortions for poor women in some circumstances. But beyond that, individual doctors and hospitals will lose an important protection from antiabortion pressure."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Link
Edited on Tue Nov-23-04 01:20 PM by raysr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC