Artemis Bunyon
(435 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-23-04 05:01 PM
Original message |
The most complete JFK assassination/Bush connection website I've seen. |
|
Full of spooky photos of the Bush clan looking devious. Porno for paranoids (which I am, so)... http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/bush.htm
|
MadHound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-23-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Thanks, looks interesting |
|
And is bookmarked for later perusal.
|
Mick Knox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-23-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:eyes:
Absurd theory #156,486,328
|
Artemis Bunyon
(435 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-23-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
What, exactly, is snicker-worthy about it?
|
JaneEyrez
(168 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-23-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
4. What is truly amazing... |
|
is that none of these people sue the site for slander because, firstly, they don't want to draw attention to it and, also, because they have no fear of ever being found culpable. I'm in shock.
|
Chelsea Patriot
(603 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-23-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message |
5. The Old Sow as A Young Sow! |
|
And I'm assuming that's Baby * in Pig Fucker Poppy's arms!
What a vile, evile Bunch!
|
orpupilofnature57
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-23-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message |
6. family picture, poster for generational workfare dynasty, devo |
Ima
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-23-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
How long sites like that will be around.
|
Carl Brennan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-24-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message |
NAO
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-24-04 12:16 AM
Response to Original message |
9. 'George Bush of the CIA'...'That Whole Bay of Pigs Thing' |
|
I thought this was all covered in depth in Conspiracy 101.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |