merh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-25-04 09:14 PM
Original message |
| Is the oath the Secret Service take to protect the president more |
|
important or solemn than their oath to serve the nation?
I mean if they are witnesses to criminal acts which are harmful to the safety and security of the nation, are they bound by their oath to the president to remain silent?
|
| The Zanti Regent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-25-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Look at what they did to Clinton! |
|
Remember all the leaks the so-called "Secret Service" gave to the Press Whores and Ken Starr?
Now they are TOTALLY SILENT when Bush committs GREATER CRIMES!
|
| StClone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-25-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 6. Bet they'd welcome Big Dog back eom |
| Winamericaback
(398 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-25-04 09:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
personally or witnessed something that is ILLEGAL (last I check in DC a blow job didn't qualify) then they are bound by law to report it. Would they? Who the hell knows...
|
| merh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-25-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. So they are required to report illegal acts? |
|
Well, maybe they will get really sloppy in their power and make some mistake (if they haven't already)!
|
| exsoccermom
(169 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-25-04 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
They didn't report the twins. (They were busted by others.)
|
| merh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-25-04 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. That's a good point, but I am talking in terms of illegal relative |
|
to harmful to the safety and security of the nation.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
