Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can one access FOX news report of Clinton's "black love child" early 1999?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:16 PM
Original message
Can one access FOX news report of Clinton's "black love child" early 1999?
Edited on Sat Nov-27-04 02:27 PM by blm
I also recall the New York Post using the report as a headline at the time.

I am also wondering if anyone was fired at FOX for reporting a story that was completely false and with its only purpose to attack and undermine a sitting President.

This was definitely a news report I saw in early 1999 (I mistakenly posted 2000 before). It was a year before they played that card on McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ardee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. funniest line on DU ever
I am also wondering if anyone was fired at FOX for reporting a story that was completely false ......

The place would be a ghost town if this was the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Oh...that was just a slightly sarcastic probe....
just in case ANY quasi-journalist was interested.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cavanaghjam Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought it was McCain's
black love child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Wally Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. That particular tempest in a teapot
Edited on Sat Nov-27-04 02:23 PM by Blue Wally
Was a supermarket tabloid story in 1992. It only got TV play as a report on the story itself. It was all based on a doctored photo. Even Fox didn't lend the story any credence. I belive it got mentioned in 2000 only as a item showing that what happened to McCain was pretty much run of the mill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No. This was a separate story BEFORE the McCain smear.
It was 99. I posted the wrong year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. The report I saw was done as a straight news story.
Edited on Sat Nov-27-04 02:33 PM by blm
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Are you sure about the name?
They spread that story about McCain's adopted daughter here in SC. Along with the story that his wife was a drug addict.

That was in 2000 to knock McCain out of the primaries and keep him from getting the nomination.

http://bartcopnation.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=8&topic_id=522

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. They practiced that attack on Clinton first. See timeline posted below.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Self-delete
Edited on Sat Nov-27-04 02:26 PM by charlie
Edit:nevermind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winamericaback Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Movie being fact?
Did anybody see Primary Colors?

It was written about Clintons run for the president. In the movie supposedly Clinton had a black child with a daughter of friends of the family...

What are they getting news from movies now?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Fired?
Naw. They followed their usual modus to evade culpability. Let the likes of Drudge splatter it on the web and report the resulting brouhaha as the focus of the story.

Here's some of Bob Somersby's reporting on how our sorry 4th estate handled the affair:

http://www.dailyhowler.com/h011399_1.shtml
http://www.dailyhowler.com/h011499_1.shtml
http://www.dailyhowler.com/h011599_1.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Here we go
Here's a snippage from a timeline of the affair:
January 1, 1999 -- Drudge reports a "world exclusive" (not true) headlined, "White House Hit With New DNA Terror; Teen Tested for Clinton Paternity." Citing the Star magazine, Drudge writes, "Word of the shocking new DNA showdown spread through the ranks inside of the White House on Friday, causing near blind chaos!"

...

January 3, 1999 -- "CLINTON PATERNITY BOMBSHELL," screams the front page of the New York Post, owned by Murdoch.

Fox TV News -- owned by Murdoch's News Corp. -- carries an account of Drudge's story, claiming he'd broken it on his Fox show and adding that it was being picked up by such mainstream papers as the New York Post.

The New York Daily News leads its Daily Dish gossip column with the headline, "Tab Probes Clinton Love-Child Rumor."

http://www.ojr.org/ojr/ethics/p1017969295.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Found this timeline on the story. Would love to see the FOX report video
and compare the FOX talking heads attacking Clinton with this story and contrast it with their recent attacks on Dan Rather.

 >>>>>>>>>>
 
February 1996 -- Joe Klein's "Primary Colors" is published and later made into a movie. In it, a young Southern governor deals with a story about impregnating a young black girl in the days before the New Hampshire primary. Klein said the incident was completely fictitious.
 
 
June 25, 1998 -- The London Daily Mail resurrects the story, suggesting that Williams' mother, Bobbi Ann, had been "paid off." It also publishes a photo of Danny Williams.
 
 
November 2, 1998 -- NewsMax.com, a politically conservative Web site, runs a story, "News on the President's Secret Son," saying Danny Williams' family was interested in establishing his paternity. (Revealingly, on most days, NewsMax runs this promotion for a book smack in the middle of its editorial listings: "Special Offer: 'The Strange Death of Vincent Foster' only $16.95.")
 
 
December 27, 1998 -- The Times of London, owned by Rupert Murdoch, reports on DNA testing for Clinton's "alleged son."
 
 
December 31, 1998 -- Matt Drudge entices guests at The Weekend, a gathering of conservative heavy hitters, by promising a story that will rock official Washington.
 
 
January 1, 1999 -- Drudge reports a "world exclusive" (not true) headlined, "White House Hit With New DNA Terror; Teen Tested for Clinton Paternity." Citing the Star magazine, Drudge writes, "Word of the shocking new DNA showdown spread through the ranks inside of the White House on Friday, causing near blind chaos!"
 
 
January 2, 1999 -- Discussion of the alleged "scandal" on various talk radio stations.
 
 
January 3, 1999 -- "CLINTON PATERNITY BOMBSHELL," screams the front page of the New York Post, owned by Murdoch. 
 
Fox TV News -- owned by Murdoch's News Corp. -- carries an account of Drudge's story, claiming he'd broken it on his Fox show and adding that it was being picked up by such mainstream papers as the New York Post. 
 
The New York Daily News leads its Daily Dish gossip column with the headline, "Tab Probes Clinton Love-Child Rumor."
 
 
January 4, 1999 -- At a White House press briefing, press secretary Joe Lockhart refuses to comment on the affair. To a question about the president's resemblance to the Williams boy on the Internet, Lockhart responds, "And I'm an alien space baby." 
 
 The Fox News Web site carries a story on the DNA paternity testing in a bylined story from the Times of London. 
 
The BBC and its Web site run a story, "New sex scandal for Clinton."
 
 
January 5, 1999 -- The Hotline, a daily summary of political reporting widely read by Beltway journalists, reports that the affair has become fodder for the late-night talk shows. "Only President Clinton could distract people from a sex scandal with another sex scandal," Jay Leno says in his monologue.
 
 
January 6, 1999 -- Drudge reveals that he has seen "a shocking new videotaped confession" by the Arkansas woman, who reveals intimate details about her "relationship" with Clinton. The video was taped by "Hard Copy." 
 
The Washington Times runs a story, "Media Abuzz With Rumors That Clinton Fathered Boy," citing only the Star and the Drudge Report. The Times reports that the Star had paid Bobbie Ann Williams a sum "in the low six figures" for her cooperation (which apparently included turning over DNA samples to the Star for testing). 
 
TotalNews.com, a compendium of major media outlets online, links to the Washington Times, BBC and New York Post in its roundup of "Clinton's Crisis" stories.
 
 
January 9, 1999 -- Time Daily reports the DNA results proved negative, confirming that Clinton is not the father. 
 
Drudge sheepishly reports the same on his Fox News show. The next morning, the Drudge Report ends its dispatch with this non-apology: "And while the elite media will bark that it was wrong to report the DNA chase that was unfolding behind the scenes -- until after it is all over, of course -- DRUDGE REPORT readers of all stripes have come to expect details on events rocking and shocking those unfortunate souls who rise to power!"
 
 
January 10, 1999 -- The New York Post, which ran the story on "Clinton's Paternity Bombshell" the previous Sunday on its front page, reports the test results -- inside. It also repeats Bobbi Ann Williams' allegations about "repeated steamy sex," including gratuitous details. 

 


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pk_du Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Here's a reference "cached in google"
January 3, 1999 -- "CLINTON PATERNITY BOMBSHELL," screams the front page of the New York Post, owned by Murdoch.

Fox TV News -- owned by Murdoch's News Corp. -- carries an account of Drudge's story, claiming he'd broken it on his Fox show and adding that it was being picked up by such mainstream papers as the New York Post.

The New York Daily News leads its Daily Dish gossip column with the headline, "Tab Probes Clinton Love-Child Rumor."



http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:65PJ9ngu8S0J:www.ojr.org/ojr/ethics/p1017969295.php+Foxnews+%22danny+williams%22+clinton&hl=en
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pk_du Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I'd forgotten Drudge used to have a Foxnews show
looks like even tho he's departed , his methods linger on at FauxNews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Now...was anyone fired?
I am hoping that some intrepid video journalist can compile the reports on Clinton's love child by the right wing "reporters" and contrast it with their current attacks on Dan Rather's ethics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. It'll have to be a journalist
or someone with access to Lexus-Nexus. The Fox News site isn't archived earlier than 2001. And archive.org's wayback machine has been deliberately excluded from collecting pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Heh. But, I'll bet some of Clinton's people MUST have taped it for
the evidence they were compiling of attacks against him.

SOMEONE must have copies. Maybe FAIR? Maybe Conason? Maybe the Clinton Library?

I'm serious about this, especially since that Dick Thornburg (R-Bush fixer) report will be out soon and I think we could counter whatever horseshit they throw at us with our own audio/video made available to Olbermann, AirAmerica, et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pk_du Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Sludge was let go but for an entirely different story
Edited on Sat Nov-27-04 04:21 PM by pk_du
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
20. Bump for anyone with access to news footage.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC