Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Turmoil at CIA As Goss Lays Down the Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:38 PM
Original message
Turmoil at CIA As Goss Lays Down the Law
WASHINGTON - When former CIA (news - web sites) Director George Tenet said his farewells at a two-hour ceremony this summer, a deputy noted that 40 percent of the agency's staff had worked for just one chief.

It was a symbol of Tenet's endurance, seven years on the job, the second longest tenure of a director. It also was a mark of agency's growth during a hiring spree that began in 1998 and accelerated after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.


With Tenet's successor, former Rep. Porter Goss (news, bio, voting record), in charge and making changes, one of the longer periods of leadership stability in the CIA's 57-year history is ending.


In an e-mail this month, Goss told employees of his plans for new procedures, organization and senior personnel. He reminded them that the CIA is a "secret agency," indirectly addressing media leaks widely believed to have angered the White House. Goss also said he intends to clarify "beyond doubt the rules of the road."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=542&ncid=703&e=1&u=/ap/20041127/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/cia_transition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. All this from a guy who said he's unqualified for the job
Oy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. But amply qualified to take *'s marching orders. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cavanaghjam Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Goss lays down the law
and picks up the axe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can't wait for the book. Anyone have the photo of him c 1963?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. you mean this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Bush Administration is so determined to block leaks that I
can only speculate what they would have done to Ken Starr if they had to deal with some like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poppet Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. This maight be off-topic but
whatever happened to the CIA report on 9/11? I have asked several times in different threads but get no response.

What ever happened to this report? Is it still being withheld? I never heard any more about it.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/102004V.shtml

Here is an excerpt from the pre-election news article:

The 9/11 Secret in the CIA's Back Pocket
By Robert Scheer
The Los Angeles Times

Tuesday 19 October 2004

The agency is withholding a damning report that points at senior officials.
It is shocking: The Bush administration is suppressing a CIA report on 9/11 until after the election, and this one names names. Although the report by the inspector general's office of the CIA was completed in June, it has not been made available to the congressional intelligence committees that mandated the study almost two years ago.

"It is infuriating that a report which shows that high-level people were not doing their jobs in a satisfactory manner before 9/11 is being suppressed," an intelligence official who has read the report told me, adding that "the report is potentially very embarrassing for the administration, because it makes it look like they weren't interested in terrorism before 9/11, or in holding people in the government responsible afterward."

When I asked about the report, Rep. Jane Harman (D-Venice), ranking Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee, said she and committee Chairman Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.) sent a letter 14 days ago asking for it to be delivered. "We believe that the CIA has been told not to distribute the report," she said. "We are very concerned."


************************

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I keep asking the SAME thing!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Good question, its buried baby its buried
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would like to remind Goss Absolute Power corrupts Absolutely
A email and a Memo isn't going to even phase these people!!!

and people leaving in droves is just going to make Goss weaker!!!

Obviously making Tenet the fall guy and the CIA was not very smart on Bush's part!!! I contend it was a fatal mistake!!! Time will tell!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have to think the Agency, as an institution, will not take this...
...sitting down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Too late!
There has already been a power struggle, and the CIA lost.

Porter Goss was given the job of executing the ringleaders and flogging the general inmate population.

However, some good may come out of it -- it will prove that the CIA is not the all-powerful behemoth that many journalists and conspiracy-mongers think it is.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Exactly. CIA is now firmly under Imperial Control
One-Party agencies for a One-Party State, eh? Isn;t THAT the rationale, stripped of it's spin, for the most recent Stalinist Purge.

Hey, at least our CIA guys get to live (for how long, though...I wonder how many of them will be Meeting With Accidents once the furr dies down), so we still got THAT over the Soviet Union.

Imperial Amerika is a Kinder and Gentler Tyranny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ever get the feeling that we are dealing with the most immature
and revenge determined high schooler from our collective past? The manipulator and plotter par excellence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well, the last guy to lay the law on the CIA was Carter
Whats the odds Bush will come out of this with his ass still bolted on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC