Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Reagan ever in full command of his faculties to be a real President?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 12:33 PM
Original message
Was Reagan ever in full command of his faculties to be a real President?
Or was he mentally disabled throughout his term by incipient Alzheimer's? And Bush Sr.was the real power behind the throne?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reagan was an actor, someone who was good at remembering his
lines. They were written for him by someone else. I think that pretty well sums up his presidency as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Exactly
He was just a figurehead that served some ceremonial purposes and gave the right wing a smiling face. There is very little evidence that he even understood what was going on in his administration or his administrations policies. In short, he was a tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. It seemed to me
that his slide began not long after he got shot. He was never the brightest, but he sort of settled into a genial fog after Hinckley popped him. In the first debate in 1984, he was a babbling goofball, not a whole lot better than Dubya's first against Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. take a look at the reagan - mondale debates
especially in comparison to the shrub - kerry debates.

reagan was still in charge of his faculties, though it was clear to all but the loyal banana republicans that he lost it during his second term.

but as to your second question, bush sr. was able to conduct some nefarious crap out of the reagan white house, not because reagan was demented, but because reagan was a hands-off, uninterested, easily manipulated manager. much of his cabinet took advantage of this, but bush sr. was just the guy to really make the most of it.

i think the bcci, savings and loans, and iran-contra messes have far more of bush's fingerprints on them than reagan's.

not to say reagan should escape blame for not paying attention, just saying i don't think he orchestrated these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Reagan epitomized less-than-brilliant people everywhere. That's
why he and Bush are so popular with the masses of stupidity in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush 10 years ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think it was just Poppy, but ...
I don't think Reagan was ever intended to be anything but a charming figurehead for the GOP. He was a better performer than Bunnypants, overall, but I don't think he ever really had any control over anything. He was every bit as 'handled' and 'stage-managed' as BushII, though he was more eloquent and actually had some command of the English language, and could be counted on to bullshit during a press conference.

People accepted him because he seemed harmless -- lots of Dems voted for him -- and I think it was true, but not the way they thought it was true. King Ron never touched anything but a pen, to sign legislation the real brains behind the throne wanted him to sign. He was the original empty suit, and they kept him on a tight rein (though not as tight as BushII, because I think other than the Alzheimer's, Reagan was relatively sane).

I also believe Reagan was starting to have cognitive difficulties not long after his second term started, probably due to Alzheimer's Disease, and that they clamped down to cover it up. You could see the tremor in his neck when he stood at a microphone -- the confusion in his eyes if he didn't have a prepared script. My brother and I used to theorize what was wrong with him when we saw him on television back in the '80s, we thought he had Parkinson's or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC