Give me one good reason why we should take anything Bush, Cheney

[KlatooBNikto]

or Rumsfeld say as having the remotest connection to truth?

[Solly Mack]

1. Just one

Anything they say, just believe the opposite.

Their lies give a clue to what the actual truth is...

[Brundle_Fly]

2. Jesus.

BWAHAHAHAAahaahaaa sorry couldn't resist.

"there is no reasons, cause there are no reasons."
-Bob Geldof

[skylarmae]

3. sorry, can't think of a thing! Now on the other side of this

coin, I could go on and on and on as to why you should not believe one iota of anything coming out of this administration.

[liberal N proud]

4. You can't believe one word that comes from their mouth

They are the classic habitual liar and could not tell the truth if they wanted to.

[bowens43]

5. Sorry. I can't think of one.

I can however think of many reasons why we should assume that anything they say is a lie.

[noamnety]

6. Well, they told the truth about

9.11
NCLB
clean skies
WMD
uranium
Enron
terrorist attacks declining
the economy
Plame
the Patient's Bill of Rights
the Saddam statue being toppled
election fraud
supporting children's hospitals
supporting bioenergy programs
Pell grants
gay rights
Bush's military service
port security
mission accomplished
the tax cuts
veteran's benefits
medicare
Never stopping thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people.

[AVID]

7. cool - now that would be a great bumper sticker - long, but great

[PATRICK]

8. Actually whenever they promise

to do harm or suggest or leak some unthinkable madness they WILL bring it about no matter what.

The pattern of their agenda is so open and monomaniacal that any fool can see what they intend, though none of the "wise" do much to head off the predictable.

There is nothing good for anyone coming from them, but you can bet your foreclosed farm on the evil they intend to do.

[Swamp Rat]

9. Oh I believe them alright! But, is everybody listening?

Didn't the PNACers say that they needed another Pear Harbor? Didn't they say that we need to invade other countries to protect our future resources? Wasn't that on page 51 in the Project for the New American Century manifesto?

How about this statement (approved by Bush and Cheney) also on page 51:

"Control of space and cyberspace. Much as control of the high seas – and the protection of international commerce – defined global powers in the past, so will control of the new “international commons” be a key to world power in the future. An America incapable of protecting its interests or that of its allies in space or the “infosphere” will find it difficult to exert global political leadership."

I take these guys dead serious when it comes to their particular brand of foreign policy. The quote above says that the Bush administration is going to control the “infosphere” more commonly known as outerspace, cyberspace, and satellite communications. This is a direct threat of war against the entire Earth, regardless of the soverignty of all other nations.

*****

PNAC - The Links Archive:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/duboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=3021&forum=DCForumID12

Read their own words:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/