Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why isn't the Justice Dept. investigating vote fraud, they are the dept.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kuozzman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:52 PM
Original message
Why isn't the Justice Dept. investigating vote fraud, they are the dept.
that has that responsibility!

Look at what they said in a press release on November 4th, 2002, titled:
Fact Sheet
PROTECTING VOTING RIGHTS AND
PREVENTING ELECTION FRAUD
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2002/November/02_at_641.htm

Since the Attorney General’s announcement on October 1st of the Voting Access and Integrity Initiative, the Criminal Division has opened sixteen cases regarding allegations of voting fraud, voter intimidation, and others. (I think most of those are regarding civilians, not election officials/gov)

Now look at this!

* The Justice Department will enforce the laws that prohibit:
Ø voter intimidation;
Ø voting by ineligible individuals;
Ø bribery;
Ø destruction of valid ballots or registrations;
Ø counting more votes than there are registered voters;
Ø altering vote tallies;
Ø voting in multiple counties;
Ø abuse of absentee ballots;
Ø malfeasance by election officials; and,
Ø ballot boxes disappearing;

Also, look at this press release from 11/1/04: http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2004/November/04_crt_730.htm
2 Qs: 1) Where were they deployed to and what's with the focus on OK, which went to Bush 66%/34%?
2) Which jurisdictions are not covered by the Voting Rights Act and why?
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Department of Justice today announced plans to send election monitors to observe the November 2 election in three Oklahoma counties in and around the Cherokee nation, Cherokee, Delaware, and Adair counties.

On October 28, 2004, the Department announced its largest election monitoring effort ever, deploying approximately 1,100 federal monitors and observers to watch elections in 25 states around the country. The Department noted the possibility of adding additional jurisdictions prior to Election Day.

Since the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Justice Department has regularly sent observers and monitors around the country to protect election-related civil rights. In addition, the Department has routinely deployed its own civil rights personnel to serve as civil rights monitors in jurisdictions not covered by the Voting Rights Act.

Refs:
DOJ: http://www.usdoj.gov/
DOJ/Criminal Division/Public Integrity Division: http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/pin.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who is in charge of the Justice Dept?
and why would it be in their interest to pursue charges?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wouldn't that be Ashcroft/Gonzalez?
Question answered. It's the Department of Injustice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I too would have asked "Who's in charge at Justice?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because they won?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
strategery blunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Adair County? WTF?
Is this Adair County OK, or Adair County, MO? I live in the latter.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kuozzman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. But still, why isn't anyone even asking them to do their job?
I'd at least like to see an inaccurate analysis done.

Or can't the fact that they are not investigating the widespread fraud allegations be used against them? There is an abundance of incicents that deserve an investigation, where is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC