Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the biggest splotches of red were in middle america, not 'the south'.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
UpsideDownFlag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:35 PM
Original message
the biggest splotches of red were in middle america, not 'the south'.
Edited on Fri Dec-10-04 01:38 PM by UpsideDownFlag


edit, since my first map didnt work- see how lots of the south is 'purple'? that means a MIX of repubs and dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. bad link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpsideDownFlag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah, it wont work. trying to fiz it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpsideDownFlag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. fixed now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not enough people of color in those sparsely-settled states to add much
blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Be careful with the implication of your statement....
Some would see it as a conservative meme....blacks' votes don't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I don't see how you could get a conservative meme out of the fact that
a sparsely-populated state is more easily voted "red" by known RW voters than is a more densely-populated one in which live many voters of color, more likely to vote "blue."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I don't necessarily get that meme from your post, unless
you are somehow justifying why mid-Western states are more Red vis-a-vis the demographic makeup of the voting population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I think it's more the Western states, rather than Mid-Western....
Idaho, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming.... very sparsely settled. Doesn't take many of the brainwashed to vote them red. Voting Ohio red took lots more; I think the difference is that lots of minorities voted blue in the Midwest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I knew when I typed "Mid-Western" you would trip me up on that.
:-)

How about "non-Southern"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. If that map was a person, I'd say he's got one hell of a venereal disease.
:wow:

Purple and red lumps... yuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. I believe it. Among the people I socialize with in Georgia,

the hard-core Bush** supporters are people who moved here from Iowa, Illinois, New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, the UK. I know only one or two Bush** voters who are from Georgia and I know one voted for Gore in 2000; 9/11 has her supporting W now.

The Democrats in my social circle are originally from Maryland, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, and Virginia. Only one comes from outside the South, from upstate New York.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpsideDownFlag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. interesting how idaho and nebraska are the most red.
they're far, far away from the south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. I think they're the most red because they're the most white....
Many working- and middle-class whites in this country have bought the RW bill of goods that the current administration will somehow keep them safe. I believe that most people of color don't buy that lie. Therefore, when you have a dearth of minorities, such as in Idaho and Nebraska, the lie gets voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. There's no dearth of minorities in Georgia

and, as I explain above, many of the Republican voters here are NOT Southerners.

To give another example, both Bob Barr and Newt Gingrich came to power largely through voters living in Cobb County, an area just outside Atlanta that is heavily populated by white Republicans who moved here from the Midwest or Northeast. Neither Barr nor Gingrich is a Southerner, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Exactly. I think lots of the whites who moved to the South did so for
some of the same reasons they moved to the West. Maybe they wanted to escape those pesky labor unions, uppity blacks, and creeping integration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gemini Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Considering the last time Indiana went blue was in '64
I'd agree with you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. What this country really needs is a GREAT dermatologist! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tighthead Prop Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I agree
What it also needs is a new perspective on almost every social and international issue you can think of:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Not many people live in the middle of 2000-acre farms/ranches, etc. ...
Could be the reason there's such a large amount of red.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaintLouisBlues Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. Many Blacks live in the rural South
Most other rural areas are lily white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiosyncratic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. Because of the Electoral College, some "blue voters" don't vote.
If you are a Democrat in sparsely-populated Wyoming, Utah, or Idaho, unless there is a very pressing local issue, what's the point of even voting?

My sister lives in Blaine County, Idaho, and they tried.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sleepless In NY Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. When is this going to stop?
I'm tired of looking at Maps, especially this one. Time for a reality check...they are called "Red States" because the MAJORITY of people who lived there voted for bush. There is just no way around it.

I don't like that fact, but it's a fact, just the same. Isn't it time to accept it and move on? This party needs some fresh ideas and fresh faces, not more maps.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiosyncratic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. My "fresh idea" is to get rid of the Electoral College so ALL
individual votes actually count. Like the other poster points out, if you are a Democrat in a predominantly Republican state, what is the point of voting?

I live in a rural area and only recently have they allowed Absentee Ballots for those of us who don't want to drive a long distance to our polling place.

If you are a Democrat in a rural Republican state and can't vote absentee, would you go to the trouble of driving to a distant polling place, especially with today's gas prices, knowing your vote won't really be counted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qanisqineq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. You are so right!
My family lives in and I grew up in ND and many of my family and most of my friends there (all Dems) have NEVER voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. Those very red states are rather small population wise
A state like NC has as many electoral votes as Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, and North Dakota combined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. Idaho and Utah are mormon country
and mormons are very economically and socially conservative. Also ironic that their political allies - fundamentalist Protestants regard them as a cult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC