Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think Bush will not be the Republican nominee in 2004.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:38 PM
Original message
I think Bush will not be the Republican nominee in 2004.
Bush is becoming such a liability to the Repugs, I think he's going to be jettisoned in 2004.

I think that at the GOP convention in New York, the Repugs will nominate Rudy "Benito" Giuliani as their candidate. It will be a surprise, but one that was planned months in advance.

And Rudy will win the election at a walk.

Think it can't happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I doubt it.
There are still plenty of idiots out there who love the cowboy but wouldn't hanker well to an "eye-talian".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think they'll nominate Rudy
He's too liberal on social issues for the Far Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. R U
smoking that stuff in a pipe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rudy is pro-choice
forget it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Just think if they nominated Limbaugh
and then Hillary jumped in to the race to save the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catholic Sensation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. If you go by Luntz's numbers
then why?

If you go based on the sentiment of a truly unbiased sample of Americans, then it could happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. A nice thought
But not a chance in hell. These thieves have what they stole fair and square, and they're not going to give it back just because they've been caught. They are the embodiment of "If I can't have it, nobody can." As their grip starts to slip, look for a lot more blood to flow; it won't be pretty, but it has to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. he is not that much of a liability yet
he is well liked by his own party, it is GOP voters with approval ratings of 90% and up which have kept Bush's ratings in the polls from totally collapsing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. His numbers among Repukes are still sky high
as you mention. The reason behind his recent drop is declines among Dems and Independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedvermoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rudy would have a tough time winning New York in my opinion.
And he might have a tough time winning some of the states that Bush won, too boot! I don't think it can happen, and certainly not "at a walk"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morningglory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I have been thinking they have a plane crash in his future.
Then they might get a sympathy vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. No
Bush is only a liability in the minds of Democrats who already hate him--in the minds of Republicans he is a tremendous asset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Think It Can't Happen"
It will happen right after Madonna and Brittany Spears invite me for a menage a trois...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCantiGOP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. I would put this possibility
somewhere in the same range as the GOP nominating Al Franken. Bush will get 95% + at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'll See Your Possibility And Raise You One
I see the possibility of the R's dumping * at the Convention less likely than Michelle Malkin and Ann Coulter inviting Al Franken for a menage a trois....


btw- did you read Al's book yet?


It rocks....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh we can dream
There are enough dumb people in this country to ensure this will not happen. Bush gets the "idiot" and "bigot" vote, so no matter what he does that will keep him around. Just watch Jerry Springer and see how many trashy people sing Bush praises out of the blue. I nearly fainted when some lesbian chick said Bush was the only man who could ever get her to switch sides again. (she called him "our great president") Yuk. It had to be the stuffed schlong in the flight suit thing, if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. Are you a person who enjoys an occasional wager?
If so, please contact me immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yeah, I think it can't happen.
Wise up, pal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. OK, all you nay-sayers...
... let's take another look at this issue next summer, after Iraq and the economy have gotten substantially worse, and the public starts blaming it all on Bush.

Bush might still be popular in some quarters now, but if summer rolls around and he's in worse trouble than he is today (just extend the trend line), the Repugs will cast him off without a second thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Carter Couldn't Have Looked Worse In August of 1980
and the Dems didn't drop him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. But, no substantial scandals, no malfeasance, and August is too late.
There WAS the Ted Kennedy thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheYellowDog Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. It will be Bush
I mean, if it's not, look at the alternatives that would please the religious RW. John Ashcroft and Tom DeLay come to mind. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. Don't Forget Moses!
Those freepers would love to see a President Heston.. nevermind the altheimers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. Glad to see I'm not the only one who sees this possibility.
Edited on Fri Sep-05-03 01:04 PM by Sinistrous
The dung dike around the White House is getting deep. One shove from a few Retrog stalwarts, and bushbaby is gone.

Not sure that the replacement will be Benito, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I wouldn't find it all that outrageous
but I think they will make him quit for one reason or another and they will nominate Chuck "Diebold" Hagel who has a very outspoken critic of *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. I agree. What happens to Bush's $200 million dollar war chest...
...if this happens? Does the next guy get to use it? Anyone know?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. he can't win with just Republicans...
...and that's what makes him expendable. We just have to peel off about 3 percent of them to win, and I think that's doable.

Regarding the $$. He hasn't raised $200 million yet. I think it's about $40 mil so far. I'd be REAL interested in knowing if fundraising is harder for him this go-round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Whatever the amount is can the next guy use it if you know? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. I think it goes to Crawford . . .
or Kennebunkport, should Dumby decide to jettison his Pig Farm in Hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
27. Huh? There Just Gonna Skip Over That Whole Primary Thingy
Edited on Fri Sep-05-03 01:22 PM by bushisanidiot
and surprise everyone with a Guilliani nomination at the convention? hmmm.. I don't think so.

On edit: There = they're
Crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
29. Bush would have to get caught doing something pretty awful for that
Like being caught in bed with a dead teenaged whore and a kilo of cocaine. Anything less wouldn't be enough. Even if he did drop out for some reason, they'd just run Jeb. The religious right would not tolerate Rudy as the nominee, despite the love that the average american has for him. I wouldn't vote for him, but I do like Rudy for rising to the occasion on 9-11, when Bush was barely able to put three words together without looking and sounding like a scared little puppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. Amazingly enough, I think there's a good chance you could be half-right.
I disagree on Rude, doubt he'd get the call.

But:

IFIFIF, by next summer, His Whistle Ass' numbers are very, very, very bad; so bad they will obviously drag many members down with him, then I'd like to hear the argument against the POSSIBILITY that his term may end like Nixon's or LBJ's: no mas. OK, maybe LBJ's wasn't exactly "no mas", but something like that. The chimp would drop out of re-election due to health or some BS, probably not resign short of massive scandal.

How can I imagine such low, low numbers? Scandals, investigations, inquiries, legal proceedings, policy setbacks, all in a vise of pressure the poor, fortunate son cannot stand up to, and leading to further abuses, scandals, etc.

Dreamy, I know. But at this point in 1979, President Raygun was just a bad-dreamy sort of notion, et voila! Things happen that aren't in the script.

These jerks are piss-poor at governing, and its increasingly showing through. The creeps are masters of political manipulation, but that can carry a stinking, dead horse only so far. Jack the weight up enough and it crumbles in flames and fallout. When the potential blow-back reaches a critical point, his supporters will look out for themselves.

KKKarl's future felon status, the debacle in Iraq, etc. are just the beginning of the fissures that are cracking their facade. Their incompetence and untrustworthiness are becoming apparent. If a big, scary terra attack occurs, we will not see a big spike in approval numbers that slowly subsides as before. Rather a short, little spike that turns to doom for the usurpers. The people are more and more likely to wise up. The mendacious media dam can burst when they smell blood.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrGonzoLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
33. No, he will be
No incumbent for president has ever been unseated in a primary. Besides, while some in the GOP are starting to murmur un-GOP like things about Bush, as a whole, the Republican electorate still thinks he's dreamy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
34. I heard someone was smoking CRACK.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. I doubt they could find another puke so dumb . .
. . that he'd do everything they (PNAC) tells him to do.

Any half-intelligent experienced politican would know that his name will be despised and spit upon for generations to come for what he is doing today. That will start as soon as the sheep realize that we are actually swimming in a deep pool of sheep-shit - thanks to their idiotic flag waving paranoia re: 9/11 and their consequent support for the mean-spirited idiot now in the WH.

I doubt that GWB even realizes how much he will be despised for this. He will have whole chapters devoted to his stupidity and self-serving hypocracy in the history books starting just a few years from now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
36. You are thinking as if you live in a Democratic Republic.
But you don't. What we live in now is rapidly transitioning to an Orwellian-Totalitarian-Free-Market-Stalinist-Oligarchic-Empire.

And in such a place "political liability" has no meaning. How can it when the very concept of "lies" and "truth" are archaic concepts to 99% of the jaded, drugged-up, worn-out, harried, hurried, bored by overamusement, post-ironic sheep that pass for the Imperial Subjects of Amerika?

I have hopes but not much more than that. This is the most disgraceful generation of Amerikans that ever lived. Either during the 225 years of the Old American Republic or these last three years of Imperial Tranistional Twilight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
37. I think you are right about shrub not being the nominee.
I've said all the way thru that he was not intended to go the full term and that once he became a liability he'd be left hung out to dry. I figured he'd go down on a forced resignation rather than anything too dramatic, however time is running out.

I am not advocating anything amd I do not wish him harm, however I do think that the same powerbrokers who put him in that office have a vested reason not to let him run again against a strong Dem candidate. I think they'll arrange a plane crash or a martyrdom for him and Jebbie will run in his stead--kinda going for that Bobbie Kennedy mystique along with the whole sympathy vote.

I think the ONLY thing that has kept him safe this long is the fact that his polling numbers were good and the American people bought the spin on WMDs and hunting down terra. Now that the numbers are starting to drop, and the polling data on questions like "Any unnamed Democrat -v- Shrub" is showing a loss on re-election I look for him to be in real trouble.

Just my two cents--and I'll put on a tin foil hat if you like, but I'm convinced it could be a possibility.

Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freethought Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
38. Bush is the Repug's man, I have NO doubt
I disagree with the original posting. The Repugs are not going to e jettison their meal ticket. And Bush is very effectively able to mobilize his base. Something thing Dems seem to have trouble doing.
Is it possible they might bring in Rudy? Yes, its possible but highly unlikely even in the extreme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
39. They own the Black Box voting machines
Why should they care who is on their ticket? Hell Goofy could be running and they will still win by 1.5% Remember no exit polls anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC